Potus ???

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

Ooooh, tetchy this morning arn't you... perhaps you should have had a lie in. Tended to do that with the little ones when they were grumpy, put them down for a nap and they get up in a far better mood.

 

 

However, if I was to give advice that would be listened to... what did your post last night actually bring to the discussion? Any insights into the POTUS thread... the way I read it it was just cheap digs... perhaps there is a place where you say it best, when you say nothing at all. When you do say, it is generally nothing to do with the thread at all, just cheap trying to get a verbal one up-manship over -anyone- really. And when that doesn't work, we all become (checking the latast insults) "sad deluded clowns"

 

So as I might have mentioned before, bring something worthwhile to the discussion. Very few (errr.... none) other embers to the forum spend anywhere like your 90% of posts trying to spew forth insults and verbals. Try a different tact and you might find people will engage positively with you.

Not tetchy that’s just you assuming yet again for the umpteenth time. . What I don’t appreciate is some anonymous internet wanker taking an unhealthy Interest and commenting on my personal life. 
Politely F…k off SP

[Steven P]

Whatever.

 

(think whatever is said about your personal life is said by you, not by any one else)

 

 

 

 

Anyway, anyone fancy going back to Biden or the Trump-Musk marriage?

 

[Johnsond]

46 minutes ago, Steven P said:

Whatever.

 

(think whatever is said about your personal life is said by you, not by any one else)

 

 

 

 

Anyway, anyone fancy going back to Biden or the Trump-Musk marriage?

 

Politely F..k off SP, take the hint. 

[Stubby]

4 hours ago, Steven P said:

 Try a different tact and you might find people will engage positively with you.

Just to be pedantic ( bringing nothing to the debate ) its " tack " not tact . As in sailing on a different tack . 🙂

[Mick Dempsey]

Or maybe he’s mixing tack, tact and tactic.

[Steven P]

No stubby had it. Grrr for all the others out there as pedantic as me!

[Johnsond]

Kyle Reyes on LinkedIn: #thinblueline #lawenforcement | 151 comments

WWW.LINKEDIN.COM

---

One of the wisest leaders in the history of our country. His words probably ring even more true...

Today’s politicians of all colours in all countries could do with watching that interview and taking in some of the very simple logic he talks about. 

[Steven P]

Intriguing and bringing it to the present day, with the thread topic. All about Financial control, and yet The Rapist wants to remove the US debt ceiling. US debt ceiling stops their Government borrowing too much without going back to the senate to explain why and ask for more. Yes, suppose politicians should watch it.

[GarethM]

16 minutes ago, Steven P said:

Intriguing and bringing it to the present day, with the thread topic. All about Financial control, and yet The Rapist wants to remove the US debt ceiling. US debt ceiling stops their Government borrowing too much without going back to the senate to explain why and ask for more. Yes, suppose politicians should watch it.

So are you suggesting they just shut up shop until some tax receipts come in ?.

 

You are aware of the amount of national debt they have, there's even a counter  and the shear amount they have to pay to just service that debt ?.

Edited December 27, 2024 by GarethM

[Steven P]

The debt ceiling has worked for about 100 years... nothing wrong with that, the check is there to limit how much they can borrow without further scrutiny - nothing wrong with that. Remove it and their national debt can spiral further without that extra scrutiny. It is agreed and raised annually anyway.. but go beyond that you have to go back cap in hand - giving some restraint to all presidents.