All Activity

Where abouts in Cumbria are you?

Well of course people did not buy their house then. And I totally agree about upgrading. I would like to move out of suburbia into proper countryside. But to do that even for a smaller house means finding about £150,000 extra, so it just ain’t gonna happen. So yes, we all lose by having high house prices, unless we are lucky enough to inherit or for some other reason have multiple houses.

An interesting liaison. An unholy union if you will. A Field Maple and I think a Hornbeam in intimate embrace.

weird how house prices were even more expensive than today in 1845 - before the minimum wage a lot of those people in 1845 would have been properly poor, so the average wage much lower

I feel for me, not being able to buy a bigger place, things were better in 1915 with a price to earnings multiple of only 2 - so if we were back in 1915 a house would be 70k in todays money, then off to the western front

I agree I do not see much poverty. Except perhaps when it comes to buying a house. I feel for my kids when they want to buy their first house. My main gripe is that the government have more money than ever, yet public services are generally dire. Of course, bear in mind I have lived in a Labour area for 26 years. Some things like education are certainly better where Labour have not been in charge for long.

I don't see the problems with taxation that you do - many of my customers are quite well off with big gardens, and not aristocrats, just people who worked hard and made good decisions when they were young. Taxation hasn't stopped them building wealth. On this forum I could mention a dozen or more guys who have build successful tree firms that are still trading, despite the tax burdens of recent decades. Take Beechwood and Aspen, both successful firms that are still trading. You could argue those business owners, as examples would be even wealthier if VAT was only 10% and Ltd tax only 10%, but my point is people are living a good standard of living in the here and now. I'm nowhere near as successful as the two I mentioned, a mere one man band, but I have savings (ISA) and a SIPP, my own modest home nearly all paid for and hopefully a few years left to increase my wealth before my body is degraded to the point manual work is not possible. Today's environment is good I'd say - I don't care about VAT or other tax, if I want more mony I just work more days, or sometimes get away with increasing prices. There is no poverty for the hard working that I can see. My tax hasn't all been sqaundered - I've seen a retired guy with a massive lump from leukemia now in remission, cancer treatments are better than 20 years ago. Someone has to pay. People can go to Uni, or become florists, bin men, chefs - all is right in the world

I don't know. Why what's with the £200 million figure?

I wasn't grumpy until the word faucet. It's a f-ing tap 😄

And it is worth remembering that when people talk about austerity, the amount of money the public sector takes as tax and spends is at record highs - not just due to the Labour government. Despite accusations of austerity public sector spending went through the roof under the Conservatives. Many services have been cut and are struggling, but this is not due to tax cuts or frugality. If only it were then the solution would be easy. Our public sector is better funded than it ever has been, but outcomes are probably worse than they ever have been at least since WW2. The actual solution is to somehow make the public sector efficient and productive.

I have pension(s) in place. A pension is no good if you can't afford anything which you have dilligently saved for, because the cost of things is so high. I'm lucky as I get paid to do my hobby, so I'll always be happy, but things aren't looking too good for many.

I replaced a spring on my 485 that broke, I don’t remember tensioning it tbh. just try and match the other one.

It is worth remembering that the billionaires you are talking about consist mainly of pension funds. In other words the future prosperity of you and I (unless you have no pension of course).

According to the media we currently have the highest overall tax burden since not long after WW2. Yes some rates may be lower, but there are many other taxes. Remember purchase tax was around 6%, this was replaced by VAT when we entered the EEC at 10%, and now it is mainly 20%. NI rates are also through the roof, property tax is higher, etc, etc, etc. So, yes we have VERY high taxation levels currently. About to get higher in a few days.

If the basic rate went back up to 33% of (PAYE) income over £12700 that would raise enough money to fight Putin for at least a fortnight

Hey Guys, Got a 495EX here that broke a spring for the infeed roller tension, I ordered a new one but I can't find anything in the manual on how to set the correct tension. I know on the Forst chippers it says finger tight and another 1.5 turn with the spanner. Any help is much appreciated, Cheers, Ralf.

but it isn't the highest tax regime since WW2, if you read that Wiki history of taxation Mark J posted above it says the basic rate was up around 33% for a while. The government of Margaret Thatcher, who favoured taxation on consumption, reduced personal income tax rates during the 1980s in favour of indirect taxation.[19] In the first budget after her election victory in 1979, the top rate was reduced from 83% to 60% and the basic rate from 33% to 30%.[20] The basic rate was also cut for three successive budgets – to 29% in the 1986 budget, 27% in 1987 and to 25% in 1988; The top rate of income tax was cut to 40%.[21] The investment income surcharge was abolished in 1985. Under the government of John Major the basic rate was reduced in stages to 23% by 1997. 21st century Under Labour chancellor Gordon Brown, the basic rate of income tax was further reduced in stages to 20% by 2007. As the basic rate stood at 35% in 1976, it has been reduced by 43% since then. However, this reduction has been largely offset by increases in other regressive taxes such as National Insurance contributions and Value Added Tax (VAT).

What else would you suggest? How else to fix things? The economic fallout from COVID and Brexit is similar to the shock of a war. You have Farage and Reform wanting to push private healthcare, Wes Streeting who was at Bildeberg and is in bed with Peter Thiel, and by association JD Vance. You can tell Streeting is popular with those who call the shots as he's the only Labour politician who gets positive press. All these people want us to move to an insurance based system of healthcare. That coupled with the advances in AI and surveillance, which also happens to be championed by Thiel, Mandelson et al; to my mind, it is a recipe for disaster. These actors are paid by the big businesses that have everything to lose. If we don't change things ourselves, we have lost. I think.

Ok, I know I know bbbbut Back on the farm and in the Woods I cannot move for fear of violating some ‘elf and safety rule. Most of which are fair but a lot are bleeding’ obvious. Caution on working on slippery surfaces, caution on ladders and working from heights, caution when using teleporters when reversing etc Now staying in London at the second hotel and there is again a faucet on both the sink and shower with no indication whatsoever of which direction to turn it for hot or cold. In the old days of separate taps you would have a red dot on the hot tap and a blue one in the cold. Years before that it would by experiment I discovered one changed the direction from shower to bath but not before I had received a blast of red hot water to my head from the shower. I have like all of you learned that turning the faucet to the left would mean hot and to the right cold. But this faucet was mounted vertically to confuse further and there was no indication of which faucet controlled the shower/bath and which the hot cold.. It seems that there is no standard as each hotel I stay in is different You would have thought that things would improve over time especially where very hot water is concerned. Rrrrrrrrrrrr

Indeed, they paid 98% on investment income until Maggie came to power in 1979. And the thresholds were not exactly high, so it wasn't just the super-rich. So I agree some (on the face of it) good things happened in the period 1946 to 1979, but the country was a basket case. And I would suggest if you are interested looking into the history of wealth taxes. It is rather chequered in terms of their success.

I'm not a fan on unnecessary barbed wire, I've found a dead roe buck that probably died from an infected stomach gash that I think was probably due to barbed wire. In the two pieces of woodland I own I've not had problems with the public. The land around our house does suffer a bit from stray livestock as many farmers down here don't seem to believe in fencing. Personally I find it amusing to have a small heard of horned cattle including a bull, cows and calves in our woodland but not everyone does. It will depend greatly on where the woodland is and what you want to do with it. I tend to like a more natural feel, so blackthorn, hawthorne or gorse along with a mix of bramble would be my choice to keep people out. If you want the woodland to look like a carpark or suburbia go with pyracantha etc.

It goes straight back to those who own the government debt ie: the billionaires we should be taxing. The richest paid 98% tax after WW2, that's how social housing and NHS was possible. Just a moment... WWW.PERPLEXITY.AI History of taxation in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

We might well have been. Glossed over it. Details. For little people. I'm having a big ideas day.

I thought we were talking about a woodland setting. Specifically, a boundary within a woodland, subdividing it into smaller plots. But I may well have got that bit wrong.

Me too, partner