manco

they can live with the pigs but what about the smell i hear you ask? the pigs will get used to it

brave words. nah, stupid words. made more stupid by the continued reference to your tiny willy "Have you stopped to think or ask why it’s happening??" and there we have it, theres what it boils down to, again.

rabid animals. and what do you do with a rabid animal? what happened to tear gassing riots? what is there to stop these creatures from rioting if theyre just gonna get away with it?

no, theyre not a cohesive fanatical mob doing this for some religious reason or in defence of their country, or against police or state brutality. theyre simply mindless thugs intent only on destroying anything that isnt theirs and taking any opportunity to behave like rabid animals id be interested to see how intimidating you feel with 30 masked and armed hooligans battering on your front door or the windows of your car. im not in any way accepting or condoning any of these fanatical extremists (lets just make that nice and clear and it applies to all sides), but they do seem or at least claim to be engaged in a religious/ anti-west attack. these sub-human creatures rioting and destroying their own communities are not even fighting for a cause, theyre just fighting and destroying. that makes it even worse when people start trying to compare them with any religious extremist that has a set agenda.

sounds to me like a good excuse for more breaks

some people just want to watch the world burn

again no obsession with your dinky thingie. it was you that brought it up. the less i have to think about your little chippolata the better. please stop mentioning it

there is no socially acceptable solution to the original event. some nutjob will always find a way to plan something but the solution never is to then go and start a riot and destroy a broken community in the name of justice it just disgusts me that this event has become political ammunition and racial hate.

lies again. youre the one who turned my mocking of your name into referring to your wedding veg. i merely and humourously pointed out that your name is an american euphemism for a one eyed trouser snake. you say you dont want to talk about cocks, but youre the one trying to find penile reference in my username? perhaps you just dont want to talk about yours because its tiny and youre ashamed of it? or is it just more attempts to deflect from the massive gaping holes in your arguments?

you didnt specify deaths. you said mass casualty attacks. you openly imply that union flag flying people are not causing a problem. you imply that only non white british ethnicities are at fault thats what ive been repeating over and over. if youre calling for the full force of law to be brought down on those rioting, why introduce the comments about union flag flying people being no problem or risk? those are the tricks of the racists. theyre the ones saying "all riots are bad, and all people attacking anyone should be punished hard, but its not us guv, we are white and innocent" and thats what youre supporting

its only you thats obsessed with your tinky winky. im just mocking your name but sure, you go on and try more tricks to belittle me, cos its hysterical watching you try to divert attention from me pointing out massive holes in your posts but sure, off you go mr todger.

you were the one who brought in the phrase and introduced it into this thread. are you now admitting you dont know what it means and you used it incorrectly when backing up the white british union flag waving crowds you imply havent caused any injury?

ah, more mature work. referring to me as a weirdo for pointing out your inconsistent arguments. and calling my posts rants. as opposed to your racial hatred that is a perfectly reasoned debate?

its more about the colour of the victims skin and the colour of the attackers skin or his religious views. that makes the difference if its a mass terror attack or a simple riot.

ah, more belittling attempts. implying im childish for pointing out the inconsistencies in your posts and stated viewpoints. that sounds about right. with a complete lack of sensible fact lets just resort to calling someone infantile. well done, Mr Wiener. you denied that any white british union flag waving people have caused any mass casualty attack. surely you remember saying that? or shall i post it again to remind you? perhaps youre getting a little old and forgetful?

im sure i saw you say it wasnt a mass casualty event? and this seems to be you saying it was applied to the policemen in this case? perhaps you need to re-read your own posts to remind yourself of which comments youre making?

lockerbie, not an immigrant shipman, not an immigrant titanic, not an immigrant hood, not an immigrant manchester, immigrant does that help?

the issue is scum are rioting and destroying their own communities for no reason or gain.

tensions have risen because idiots keep burning libraries and discouraging learning. and then more idiots online start slagging off anyone not white in britain, under the claim of asylum seekers being dangerous.

no? so you deny saying that.

that would be mr love-length who first introduced the claim of 2 tier policing into this thread.

yes, youre right mr wiener. by definition everything i say is wrong and biased, even when all im doing is quoting your own words at you. common definition you say. as opposed to the basic definition of a casualty, or more than one person injured? ah, so youre saying that no property has been damaged in any of the riots? ok, obviously the news was lying about the shops being smashed and looted, and the library burnt, and the cars on fire, and walls pulled down for something to throw. yes that sounds right, the bbc lying again and reporting false news. unlike the people who reported that the southport attacker was a muslim asylum seeker immigrant. they were clearly giving the real truth. im not embarrassed at all with your name, are you? sounds like it isnt all that big, that could be the problem.

and the statement in question is you implying that no white british union flag waving people have injured anyone in any way or caused and destruction. "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " it was that one, by the way. it seems to be the statement you stand by and the sentiment you live by. and thats why its causing an issue. fyi, claiming there is 2 tier policing, or suggesting that "everyone should be policed equally" is simply the smokescreen used by those claiming johnny foreigner is rampaging on our shores.

wahey i get to throw your own words in your face again (ive got it copied to paste in as many times as you want) "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " there we go. theres you quoted implying that no violent attacks were carried out. when i called you out on it you tried to change what you define as a violent attack. nah digs at your surname just make me giggle. not desperation at all. im enjoying the view from up here on the moral high ground, i think ill stay up here a bit longer. oi, Master with a uppercase M please, thank you very much Mr Schlong.

but if you are to believe all those on the right, they are being policed the same, because these on the right claim the muslims and non whites are getting away with all of this and going unpoliced. like the specific mention of a palestinian being given safe passage through a riot.