manco

wow. powerful argument. backed up by solid fact. wanna blow a raspberry at me too and complete your position?

all attacks carried out by muslims or immigrants, and they seem to be the attacks you have such a beef with. but you seem fine to accept when white british flock to the area of a tragic event and start smashing the place up under claims of defending the local area they dont even live in? and when more white british start more riots days later in other areas smashing shops, looting, burning. you seem to feel thats ok? only the attacks by immigrants that you have a problem with? because those are the ones you pick out to mention. fyi, i have no left wing, or right wing bias or standing, (more of a breast man myself). i just have an anti-scum bias. is that a problem for you?

so youre saying that because they havent " decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked" they are somehow innocent of all the carnage and destruction and less guilty than those of muslim faith engaged in what they consider a religious war? should you not be judged on all things you say? youre the one talking about the far right, the far left, and fascism, im just calling rioters scum. why do you choose to argue with that?

yet again, what you said was that white british arent engaged in or carrying out a mass casualty terror attack in the uk. ive simply pointed out thats exactly what they are doing. you dont seem able to cope with someone picking holes in your own statements.

Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. equally? i pointed out a "mass casualty terror attack in the uk" carried out by those claiming to be supporters of the uk, and you chose to pretend you didnt say it and start backpeddalling. the last comment which you claim is stupid and shows lack of rationale, is nothing of the sort. "if you defend the riots, or in any way support or justify the actions of those invovled youre as bad as the boy with the knife." seems perfectly reasonable to me.

since you ask, this was the comment that suggests he supports the riots and the racists "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. "

ive made up nothing. your posts stink very highly of the same kinda logic employed by those encouraging more rioting by associating a vile attack with immigration. you seem intent on pouring hate on the police and authorities for trying to stamp down on the chaos and rioting. you sound like the kinda person who spells african american with two Gs youre saying the police lets the blacks riot but cracks down on the whites. thats taken directly from you saying its 2-tier policing letting the black lives matter protests go ahead but stamping down on violent white anti-immigrant riots. you condemn the riots but ask why theyre cracking down on them more than when black people protested? thats how it looks. you seem to support the thinking of the far right and the anti-immigrant views and politics. lots of anti-left comments going on in what you post. but mostly i think this is the comment that marks you out as being racist and secretly supporting the anti-immigrant thoughts "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK." thats only being seen one way. theres no second way thats being viewed. thats clearly you saying muslims are evil and are getting away with killing people and the whites waving union jacks while looting shops are innocent.

where was the law applied by the scum that ripped apart locals walls to attack a mosque? where was the law applied in burning a library? where was the law applied in any of the rioting and destruction? what good was achieved by any of it? if you defend the riots, or in any way support or justify the actions of those invovled youre as bad as the boy with the knife.

the laws must be applied equally regardless of race or religion, but you support racist scumbags rioting and causing chaos, attacking other faiths (and always specifically muslims, never sikh, hindu, or any other). lets not forget how all of this started, one man, NOT a muslim, brutally and intentionally murdered 3 innocent children and injured 8 more in a senseless predmeditated attack. there is not even the slightest justification at all in anyone adding more violence to innocent people. anyone that in any way supports, or encourages or even simply accepts rioting and violence in the name of justice is entirely and equally as bad as the 17 yr old who did the stabbing in the first place.

yet again, people will try to change what theyve previously said as justification for violence and chaos. The unjust will not listen to the reasoning of the innocent. Some men aren't looking for anything logical. They can't be reasoned with. Some men just want to watch the world burn. There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted men and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter. Beware the rioter, for he is the devil's pawn. Alone among God's creatures, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home, and yours. Shun him... for he is the harbinger of death. The true enemy is war itself.

the undisputed beginning and the end of it: its not defending your rights, its being a bloodthirsty scumbag anyone at all, using the despicable slaughter of young children as an excuse for violence and rioting is scum. f*cking pack it in!

so youre happy to let muslims and sikhs come and attack churches and threaten and intimidate the white british catholics? because thats what you seem to be saying. or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. this is what you stated, and what i specified has been going on. once again, people try to change what theyve previously said as justification for violence and chaos. The tyrant can always find an excuse for his tyranny. The unjust will not listen to the reasoning of the innocent.

my understanding (which currently is gathered from arms length with a look of extreme distaste), is that there is a lot of organisation in the background with lowlifes orchestrating others into chaos and misery while staying safely at home themselves. i agree they are standing against a lot, mostly common sense, civility and basic humanity, but not really standing for anything apart from violence and chaos. "some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn." i believe the political aims, as vague as they are, are only shoehorned in to entice support from those who say "immigrant" but mean anyone with skin darker than them most normal political racist anti-immigrant people arent setting out to riot and loot shops and burn places of education and prayer. people need to stop confusing and mis-labelling these scum as simple racists. these are purely scum who want to destroy the world around them and cause misery.

no. just no. on so many levels. the least of which being to not give these scumbags political or cultural intention. in fact stop calling them far-right or rasict. stop giving their disgusting behaviour any justification at all. these are not even political activists. these are scum who are going looking for the slightest reason to destroy and attack. the nazi as wrong and disgusting as they were had at least a vague political reasoning and intent. these people are below even that group. these people have no intent other than to riot and destroy and behave worse than animals. stop justifying their actions with any reason. libraries burnt. where is the anti-immigrant reason there? shops looted. how is that standing up for england? property destroyed to fuel more attacks. what justice does that seek?

last night yesterday afternoon and the night before and the night before that theyre riots, not protests its not civil unrest, its neanderthal barbarism its not defending your rights, its being a bloodthirsty scumbag anyone at all, using the despicable slaughter of young children as an excuse for violence and rioting is scum. f*cking pack it in!

never had a problem with the length of my device, just saying.

thats a moa. not a moan.

ooaaarrrghhhh

A or C? ive found pfanner arborist robust but feel a bit chunky. stihl x flex have leg vents advance x light are about the thinnest and coolest i know of, but only in type A

so just a thought, my mind throwing in ideas, observations if you will, "potus" anagramises as "pouts" Why do adults pout? Pouting is when we are having an internal pity party because we haven't gotten what we wanted, things haven't gone the way we'd hoped they might, we heard something we didn't want to hear or disagree with, or we have to work on something when we would rather be doing something else. So we pout.

im reminded of joey using a thesaurus when writing a recommendation for monica and chandler as foster parents. "They're humid, prepossessing Homo sapiens with full-sized aortic pumps." keep it polite and simple and dont talk shite.

All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the AA ever done for us?

whats grindr?

let down. false advertising

whats your wife like then? got any pics?