manco

its more about the colour of the victims skin and the colour of the attackers skin or his religious views. that makes the difference if its a mass terror attack or a simple riot.

ah, more belittling attempts. implying im childish for pointing out the inconsistencies in your posts and stated viewpoints. that sounds about right. with a complete lack of sensible fact lets just resort to calling someone infantile. well done, Mr Wiener. you denied that any white british union flag waving people have caused any mass casualty attack. surely you remember saying that? or shall i post it again to remind you? perhaps youre getting a little old and forgetful?

im sure i saw you say it wasnt a mass casualty event? and this seems to be you saying it was applied to the policemen in this case? perhaps you need to re-read your own posts to remind yourself of which comments youre making?

lockerbie, not an immigrant shipman, not an immigrant titanic, not an immigrant hood, not an immigrant manchester, immigrant does that help?

the issue is scum are rioting and destroying their own communities for no reason or gain.

tensions have risen because idiots keep burning libraries and discouraging learning. and then more idiots online start slagging off anyone not white in britain, under the claim of asylum seekers being dangerous.

no? so you deny saying that.

that would be mr love-length who first introduced the claim of 2 tier policing into this thread.

yes, youre right mr wiener. by definition everything i say is wrong and biased, even when all im doing is quoting your own words at you. common definition you say. as opposed to the basic definition of a casualty, or more than one person injured? ah, so youre saying that no property has been damaged in any of the riots? ok, obviously the news was lying about the shops being smashed and looted, and the library burnt, and the cars on fire, and walls pulled down for something to throw. yes that sounds right, the bbc lying again and reporting false news. unlike the people who reported that the southport attacker was a muslim asylum seeker immigrant. they were clearly giving the real truth. im not embarrassed at all with your name, are you? sounds like it isnt all that big, that could be the problem.

and the statement in question is you implying that no white british union flag waving people have injured anyone in any way or caused and destruction. "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " it was that one, by the way. it seems to be the statement you stand by and the sentiment you live by. and thats why its causing an issue. fyi, claiming there is 2 tier policing, or suggesting that "everyone should be policed equally" is simply the smokescreen used by those claiming johnny foreigner is rampaging on our shores.

wahey i get to throw your own words in your face again (ive got it copied to paste in as many times as you want) "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " there we go. theres you quoted implying that no violent attacks were carried out. when i called you out on it you tried to change what you define as a violent attack. nah digs at your surname just make me giggle. not desperation at all. im enjoying the view from up here on the moral high ground, i think ill stay up here a bit longer. oi, Master with a uppercase M please, thank you very much Mr Schlong.

but if you are to believe all those on the right, they are being policed the same, because these on the right claim the muslims and non whites are getting away with all of this and going unpoliced. like the specific mention of a palestinian being given safe passage through a riot.

im struggling to understand why you would still be trying desperately to pretend you didnt say what you said and that you didnt mean what you said you meant. ive taken your own words and turned them against you and you dont like it. lets have another look at your comment which you claim means something else "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " since youre clearly a tory supporter, ill remind you of someone asking BoJo about the price of a pint of milk? when he got it wrong he tried to change the pint into a 2 pint. supporting the current riots by implying theyre not as bad as those carried out by any islam extremists (which you specifically referred to)

well it is your definition, because its how you chose to redefine the parameters of a statement you previously made. as is the way with fools. ill include some reference material for you, try Library of Congress Aesop Fables (read.gov) the Master has indeed woken and spoken, and im glad to see you recognise my position as your Master. hey it wasnt my choice that your name is slang for a male appendage, but hey if the shoe fits. too early for male appendage? what can i say, its morning, its arbtalk, theres gonna be wood. its not racist filth to say all riots must be policed in the same way. but when that statement is then presented alongside the suggestion that no union flag waving white british people have carried out any violent attacks, and that various muslim and non white british have carried them all out, then that is clearly racist filth. and thats exactly what youve stated, and everyone who denies it is being branded as blinded by their biased view. because thats the only way you people can work.

you see you say youre condemning rioting, and maybe you even are, but then in the next breath you will always say that the police are making stronger resistance to these riots than to anything carried out by non white british people, (all of which specifically named by you). its like people who start off by saying "im not racist, but..." "i condemn all riots, but they are just trying to defend their home and country (by destroying their local area and burning shops and libraries) and the police are picking on them" you try to defend the current riots by implying that migrants and muslimists are worse and doing more harm. its bullshit and everyone sees through it. your own words, claiming the white british arent carrying out mass casualty attacks. and when i pointed out they have, you seek to change what defines a mass casualty attack. claiming people are "blinded by a biased view" doesnt back up your feeble arguments as much as you think it does.

well done thats just what i would expect you to say mr wang. with a lack of sensible reasoning you will paint everything i say as incoherent, demented, and rabid and attempt to discredit me for not backing up your racist filth. what former leaders? im not standing for anybody but comment sense and civility, mr willy. i presume nothing, ive stated nothing but fact of events and direct observation of your posts. and now after being caught out by your own words youre seeking to try and change what your words meant. having been caught out with examples of the union flag waving riots and attacks you seek to change your definition of a mass casualty event. and then to suggest im drunk? no. not even drunk on power. but the small minded will try to suggest anything to dig themselves out. not my fault if you dont recognise or understand and appreciate the cleverness of my wit and guile with my quotes. obviously youre a man of limited interest.

sadly i dont think being white males leaves us safe from these people i dont believe they have any serious political intent or aim, theyre just using any excuse to destroy and cause carnage. but im sure these people cant tell the difference between a hindu and a muslim either

im just gonna leave this photo here and let you all make your own judgements

you see you say this, you say you want them all treated equally, but you dont feel that white people rioting in the streets is as much of a problem as some black people protesting? and you try to make some political statement from the current riots? wheres the politics involved? some full-on nutjob got up in the morning and sharpened his knife and got in a taxi wearing a mask and went out to slaughter a bunch of young children. then some scumbags decided that the best thing for the grieving community was to have riot and attack some people entirely unconnected to it, and the police tried to stamp it out. im not seeing any politics in there. nor am i seeing any distinction of race or religion in the innocent children slaughtered. certainly nothing political there. lets remember what you said. "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " thats you making it political and involving race and religion.

ill take what you say, ill dig out the inconsistencies in it, ill polish them up nice and bright, and ill throw it all back in your face and blind you with my brilliance while you beat your fists in impotent rage. and you cant win. because in a battle of wits, youre turning up unarmed. You think I'm a hero? I am not a hero. I'm a drifter with nothing to lose. And if you're smart, that scares you, because I'm in your blind spot and I have nothing better to do.

you dont feel that they have a religious beef with white britain and the non-muslim world? is your head up your own arse or up someone elses? im pretty sure you yourself have stated that the islamists have been attacking the non muslim world. does that not make it religious? what else do you see it as apart from a religious war? perhaps you feel that your faith is the one true faith and that all others are heathens who should be burnt (burned? burnt? at the stake for not being christian?

applied equally but a little bit more on the non-whites and immigrants who are stealing our jobs and homes? is that what you mean? it is what you mean. but you will try to say its not. all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. so you admit that a lot of officers (and the general public) have been injured, by people claiming to stand up for white britain, but you dont see that its a "mass casualty terror attack" carried out by union-jack-waving white british people rioting in the streets?

johnson (american slang for dick by the way) seems to feel theres 2 tier policing because the police tried to stop the progress of senseless rioting and destruction but didnt stop protests about a black man being killed in america. he seems to dislike that many blacks people were allowed to protest against someone being killed, but that a bunch of anti-immigrant whites werent allowed to smash up a few cities.

im not struggling with what youre saying, youre shouting your hate loud enough for everyone to see. im just viewing you with extreme distaste for trying to find political capital from the barbaric premeditated slaughter of innocent young children again youre trying (and failing) to paint me as supporting terror attacks because i called you on your own inconsistencies? i pointed out the mass casualty attacks carried out by the union jack waving white british and you didnt like it. so you try and belittle me with your lies? but it doesnt work. because my standing is not based on falsehoods or politics. my standing is based on stating that those rioting are all scum.

treated equally. but you seek to differentiate between those two groups who as you put it, carried out mass casualty terror attacks in the uk. you seem to have a problem with a few rogue muslim nutters attacking whites, but you have no problems with a bigger number of coordinated attacks by white british against normal innocent muslim communities? so you bring exactly the kind of tommy robinson bullshit into it to try and claim im supporting terrorism? point out where ive supported any isalmic terrorism of any kind? ive pretty much non-stop just called them ALL scum and inhuman filth i think your political and cultural leanings are showing through.