manco

im struggling to understand why you would still be trying desperately to pretend you didnt say what you said and that you didnt mean what you said you meant. ive taken your own words and turned them against you and you dont like it. lets have another look at your comment which you claim means something else "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " since youre clearly a tory supporter, ill remind you of someone asking BoJo about the price of a pint of milk? when he got it wrong he tried to change the pint into a 2 pint. supporting the current riots by implying theyre not as bad as those carried out by any islam extremists (which you specifically referred to)

well it is your definition, because its how you chose to redefine the parameters of a statement you previously made. as is the way with fools. ill include some reference material for you, try Library of Congress Aesop Fables (read.gov) the Master has indeed woken and spoken, and im glad to see you recognise my position as your Master. hey it wasnt my choice that your name is slang for a male appendage, but hey if the shoe fits. too early for male appendage? what can i say, its morning, its arbtalk, theres gonna be wood. its not racist filth to say all riots must be policed in the same way. but when that statement is then presented alongside the suggestion that no union flag waving white british people have carried out any violent attacks, and that various muslim and non white british have carried them all out, then that is clearly racist filth. and thats exactly what youve stated, and everyone who denies it is being branded as blinded by their biased view. because thats the only way you people can work.

you see you say youre condemning rioting, and maybe you even are, but then in the next breath you will always say that the police are making stronger resistance to these riots than to anything carried out by non white british people, (all of which specifically named by you). its like people who start off by saying "im not racist, but..." "i condemn all riots, but they are just trying to defend their home and country (by destroying their local area and burning shops and libraries) and the police are picking on them" you try to defend the current riots by implying that migrants and muslimists are worse and doing more harm. its bullshit and everyone sees through it. your own words, claiming the white british arent carrying out mass casualty attacks. and when i pointed out they have, you seek to change what defines a mass casualty attack. claiming people are "blinded by a biased view" doesnt back up your feeble arguments as much as you think it does.

well done thats just what i would expect you to say mr wang. with a lack of sensible reasoning you will paint everything i say as incoherent, demented, and rabid and attempt to discredit me for not backing up your racist filth. what former leaders? im not standing for anybody but comment sense and civility, mr willy. i presume nothing, ive stated nothing but fact of events and direct observation of your posts. and now after being caught out by your own words youre seeking to try and change what your words meant. having been caught out with examples of the union flag waving riots and attacks you seek to change your definition of a mass casualty event. and then to suggest im drunk? no. not even drunk on power. but the small minded will try to suggest anything to dig themselves out. not my fault if you dont recognise or understand and appreciate the cleverness of my wit and guile with my quotes. obviously youre a man of limited interest.

sadly i dont think being white males leaves us safe from these people i dont believe they have any serious political intent or aim, theyre just using any excuse to destroy and cause carnage. but im sure these people cant tell the difference between a hindu and a muslim either

im just gonna leave this photo here and let you all make your own judgements

you see you say this, you say you want them all treated equally, but you dont feel that white people rioting in the streets is as much of a problem as some black people protesting? and you try to make some political statement from the current riots? wheres the politics involved? some full-on nutjob got up in the morning and sharpened his knife and got in a taxi wearing a mask and went out to slaughter a bunch of young children. then some scumbags decided that the best thing for the grieving community was to have riot and attack some people entirely unconnected to it, and the police tried to stamp it out. im not seeing any politics in there. nor am i seeing any distinction of race or religion in the innocent children slaughtered. certainly nothing political there. lets remember what you said. "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. " thats you making it political and involving race and religion.

ill take what you say, ill dig out the inconsistencies in it, ill polish them up nice and bright, and ill throw it all back in your face and blind you with my brilliance while you beat your fists in impotent rage. and you cant win. because in a battle of wits, youre turning up unarmed. You think I'm a hero? I am not a hero. I'm a drifter with nothing to lose. And if you're smart, that scares you, because I'm in your blind spot and I have nothing better to do.

you dont feel that they have a religious beef with white britain and the non-muslim world? is your head up your own arse or up someone elses? im pretty sure you yourself have stated that the islamists have been attacking the non muslim world. does that not make it religious? what else do you see it as apart from a religious war? perhaps you feel that your faith is the one true faith and that all others are heathens who should be burnt (burned? burnt? at the stake for not being christian?

applied equally but a little bit more on the non-whites and immigrants who are stealing our jobs and homes? is that what you mean? it is what you mean. but you will try to say its not. all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. so you admit that a lot of officers (and the general public) have been injured, by people claiming to stand up for white britain, but you dont see that its a "mass casualty terror attack" carried out by union-jack-waving white british people rioting in the streets?

johnson (american slang for dick by the way) seems to feel theres 2 tier policing because the police tried to stop the progress of senseless rioting and destruction but didnt stop protests about a black man being killed in america. he seems to dislike that many blacks people were allowed to protest against someone being killed, but that a bunch of anti-immigrant whites werent allowed to smash up a few cities.

im not struggling with what youre saying, youre shouting your hate loud enough for everyone to see. im just viewing you with extreme distaste for trying to find political capital from the barbaric premeditated slaughter of innocent young children again youre trying (and failing) to paint me as supporting terror attacks because i called you on your own inconsistencies? i pointed out the mass casualty attacks carried out by the union jack waving white british and you didnt like it. so you try and belittle me with your lies? but it doesnt work. because my standing is not based on falsehoods or politics. my standing is based on stating that those rioting are all scum.

treated equally. but you seek to differentiate between those two groups who as you put it, carried out mass casualty terror attacks in the uk. you seem to have a problem with a few rogue muslim nutters attacking whites, but you have no problems with a bigger number of coordinated attacks by white british against normal innocent muslim communities? so you bring exactly the kind of tommy robinson bullshit into it to try and claim im supporting terrorism? point out where ive supported any isalmic terrorism of any kind? ive pretty much non-stop just called them ALL scum and inhuman filth i think your political and cultural leanings are showing through.

wow. powerful argument. backed up by solid fact. wanna blow a raspberry at me too and complete your position?

all attacks carried out by muslims or immigrants, and they seem to be the attacks you have such a beef with. but you seem fine to accept when white british flock to the area of a tragic event and start smashing the place up under claims of defending the local area they dont even live in? and when more white british start more riots days later in other areas smashing shops, looting, burning. you seem to feel thats ok? only the attacks by immigrants that you have a problem with? because those are the ones you pick out to mention. fyi, i have no left wing, or right wing bias or standing, (more of a breast man myself). i just have an anti-scum bias. is that a problem for you?

so youre saying that because they havent " decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked" they are somehow innocent of all the carnage and destruction and less guilty than those of muslim faith engaged in what they consider a religious war? should you not be judged on all things you say? youre the one talking about the far right, the far left, and fascism, im just calling rioters scum. why do you choose to argue with that?

yet again, what you said was that white british arent engaged in or carrying out a mass casualty terror attack in the uk. ive simply pointed out thats exactly what they are doing. you dont seem able to cope with someone picking holes in your own statements.

Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. equally? i pointed out a "mass casualty terror attack in the uk" carried out by those claiming to be supporters of the uk, and you chose to pretend you didnt say it and start backpeddalling. the last comment which you claim is stupid and shows lack of rationale, is nothing of the sort. "if you defend the riots, or in any way support or justify the actions of those invovled youre as bad as the boy with the knife." seems perfectly reasonable to me.

since you ask, this was the comment that suggests he supports the riots and the racists "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. "

ive made up nothing. your posts stink very highly of the same kinda logic employed by those encouraging more rioting by associating a vile attack with immigration. you seem intent on pouring hate on the police and authorities for trying to stamp down on the chaos and rioting. you sound like the kinda person who spells african american with two Gs youre saying the police lets the blacks riot but cracks down on the whites. thats taken directly from you saying its 2-tier policing letting the black lives matter protests go ahead but stamping down on violent white anti-immigrant riots. you condemn the riots but ask why theyre cracking down on them more than when black people protested? thats how it looks. you seem to support the thinking of the far right and the anti-immigrant views and politics. lots of anti-left comments going on in what you post. but mostly i think this is the comment that marks you out as being racist and secretly supporting the anti-immigrant thoughts "Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK." thats only being seen one way. theres no second way thats being viewed. thats clearly you saying muslims are evil and are getting away with killing people and the whites waving union jacks while looting shops are innocent.

where was the law applied by the scum that ripped apart locals walls to attack a mosque? where was the law applied in burning a library? where was the law applied in any of the rioting and destruction? what good was achieved by any of it? if you defend the riots, or in any way support or justify the actions of those invovled youre as bad as the boy with the knife.

the laws must be applied equally regardless of race or religion, but you support racist scumbags rioting and causing chaos, attacking other faiths (and always specifically muslims, never sikh, hindu, or any other). lets not forget how all of this started, one man, NOT a muslim, brutally and intentionally murdered 3 innocent children and injured 8 more in a senseless predmeditated attack. there is not even the slightest justification at all in anyone adding more violence to innocent people. anyone that in any way supports, or encourages or even simply accepts rioting and violence in the name of justice is entirely and equally as bad as the 17 yr old who did the stabbing in the first place.

yet again, people will try to change what theyve previously said as justification for violence and chaos. The unjust will not listen to the reasoning of the innocent. Some men aren't looking for anything logical. They can't be reasoned with. Some men just want to watch the world burn. There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted men and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter. Beware the rioter, for he is the devil's pawn. Alone among God's creatures, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home, and yours. Shun him... for he is the harbinger of death. The true enemy is war itself.

the undisputed beginning and the end of it: its not defending your rights, its being a bloodthirsty scumbag anyone at all, using the despicable slaughter of young children as an excuse for violence and rioting is scum. f*cking pack it in!

so youre happy to let muslims and sikhs come and attack churches and threaten and intimidate the white british catholics? because thats what you seem to be saying. or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. this is what you stated, and what i specified has been going on. once again, people try to change what theyve previously said as justification for violence and chaos. The tyrant can always find an excuse for his tyranny. The unjust will not listen to the reasoning of the innocent.