Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Peter 1955

Member
  • Posts

    414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peter 1955

  1. I think they provide seatbelts nowadays, you don't have to take your own. ๐Ÿค”
  2. As I said, I don't climb, so that's educating me. I'd never considered that, thanks, and thanks to Joe earlier. Perhaps I aren't as far out of line as I thought. Thanks.
  3. Now we're getting somewhere. Surely every saw has an optimum bar for comfort, and I don't expect that to be the biggest one you can physically bolt on it.
  4. Now you see, that's the sort of answer to show me what I may be missing. I take that on board, as I don't climb. However, as a general rule, trees and limbs get bigger as you get lower. Don't you therefore start with a small saw, short bar at the top, go up a size part way down, and break out the big guns near the bottom? My work is all on the floor, so I want the handiest saw I can get for the main part of my work. I'll go bigger only when the job dictates. Edit: You said " bar length within reason". Does that mean not exceeding manufacturers recommendations? This is what I'm trying to get my head round.
  5. Far be it from me to point out that I have one Kombi shaft with two different sizes of line available, one with guard for metal shredder knife and the like, and one with no guard with the blade badged by some as chisel tooth ( the one that looks like a chainsaw tooth ) all swapped merely by turning the locking shaft knob on the power unity. That could be construed as being a smug git, so I definitely won't do that. Seriously, for years, I've looked at buying a big strimmer/clearing saw, but having gone down the Kombi route years ago, there's no way I can justify that. I can't even justify the short reach HL 92K hedgecutter, even though I desperately need one. The miserable swines at Stihl purposely made it so that I can't build one out of retired machines, as the drive shafts are all differing lengths and fittings, grr!
  6. When I see Youtube videos, particularly of our American cousins, they all seem to have bars about four feet long on 30cc saws. ๐Ÿค” ( Slight exaggeration, I know, but you get the idea ). On here recently, I've recently seen people recommending 20" bars on an MS 261 for instance. To me, for efficient use, that's 400 territory. I always start with the smallest bar specified for the saw as the default, and the biggest for when you need it. The small bar makes it nice to use. My 251 had a 13" bar on it, and I always felt that was too big for the cursed thing. The 261 has a 14", which it laughs at, but 20"? My 400 with a 20" bar on is a vastly different animal to when it has a 16" bar on. Is it just me? Am I ridiculously heavy handed? Are people fitting razor sharp chains that I don't know about? I'm genuinely interested to hear the views of some of the experts on here.
  7. I'm really not up on the theory/details, all I can say is that the fact that the 4-mix engines run on exactly the same fuel as I put in my chainsaws means no risk of mis-fuelling. For me the big plus is that the 4-mix are very economical, and in my humble opinion, powerful. Against, the valve gear requires regular maintenance, to ensure reliable operation. I know many people said they preferred the power delivery from the 2 strokes, and I told my dealer that I felt the 4-mix engines didn't seem to run at as high revs, which made the strimmer lines less efficient. I once used a big Husky 2 stroke strimmer, which was woefully underpowered, and had a raging thirst, so I'm in no hurry to change from my 4-mix ones. Other people's views may differ. Edit: My son's views differ. He gave me his old 2 stroke Kombi, he's gone battery powered. ๐Ÿ˜‚
  8. Didn't last a morning here. ๐Ÿ˜ŸStarted lashing it down just when I'd considered putting the mower in the van and cutting some grass.
  9. The Kombi systems were some of the first to go 4-mix, I believe. My dealer was initially sceptical, when I enquired about them, but now they're commonplace, and I'm more than happy with mine.
  10. As William says, the great beauty of battery/mains saws is the immediate motor stop when the trigger is released, yet it's always ready to cut instantly. Also, the low noise. For me, the battery saw is only to make them small enough to carry to the mains one in the yard. It cuts 12" without batting an eyelid, and keeps going all day.
  11. Define sensible, and define boot! ๐Ÿ˜‰ The boot on my Transit would need more than one set of batteries.๐Ÿ˜‚ My Makita is over two years old, and I'd say it's had more than light use. Still going well.
  12. I've filled a 12ft Ifor trailer on one set of batteries before now. Very large willow branches fallen into a crop, cut into manageable lengths. I would never try to cut anything over a couple of inches diameter into logs with it, that's what the mains one at home is for. Bigger diameters and constant cutting kills batteries. I haven't used the 18v model, so can't comment on how much lighter/easier that is, but I find the 36v one to be a joy to use for trimming.
  13. Posted @withregram โ€ข @chain_wood ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‘@perry_trees Unfortunately weโ€™ve... WWW.FACEBOOK.COM Posted @withregram โ€ข @chain_wood ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‘@perry_trees Unfortunately weโ€™ve had to part ways with Tarquin. (Heโ€™s sacked) It seems he lied on the job application. #stihl #fail... ๐Ÿ˜‚
  14. Snap. Mine's a little bit like Trigger's broom. New engine and new deck. Don't forget the strimmer too, for fiddly bits.
  15. The Makita ( 36v) saws are very good, but they're not Pro saws. Hobby/occasional. Can eat batteries for fun if you're logging, they're more for making stuff manageable.
  16. Don't panic Mr Mainwaring! Round here ( twenty miles from Drax ) all the farms are growing Miscanthus to meet the demand for fuel, so we're alright there. Must go now, the Gloucester Old Spots are coming in to land, and they'll need refuelling. ๐Ÿ˜‚
  17. The difference in impact energy between SDS and SDS Max is considerable. So is the weight. Screwfix kit is hard to come a cropper with as their returns policy is normally excellent. A machine like this is a bridge between the standard drill ( which can be found wanting on heavier jobs ) and the three foot tall breakers. I couldn't manage without at least one of each.
  18. Sometimes a TPO can be quick. When I worked on a farm, we had someone cutting a dyke with a vee bucket. In a 150 acre field, along the tree line. Friday afternoon, and there were a few branches in his way. I removed them with my saw, no problem, half an hour job. Monday morning, and the dyke had to be dug far enough away from the trees to avoid branches, as there was now a TPO on them, so I was told. This was over twenty years ago, mind.
  19. Peter 1955

    461 value

    With a 16" bar on the 400, you will pick it up before the 461 most days. ๐Ÿ˜‰ You may also smile a lot, when using it. I do. Even with a 20" bar on, it's a handy saw. I don't regret retiring the 038 one tiny little bit. ๐Ÿ˜‚
  20. Peter 1955

    461 value

    If I'm absolutely honest, either my 261 is too big, or the 400 is too small. ๐Ÿ˜‰ However, even though I considered a 462 when I got the 400, it's more saw than I need, or can justify. ( I did give it very serious consideration though ). There are very few right or wrong answers in this game, but a lot of valid opinions.
  21. If I knew that Mr Keen but Green lived close to God's County, I might easily have typed that. ๐Ÿ˜‚ I like your style, Sir.
  22. Peter 1955

    461 value

    On paper, I'd say you're absolutely correct, only 2" difference in max/min bar sizes, and very little weight difference. The big difference is power, and it's a lot. I'm happy with that pairing, it suits me for what I do, but I believe you're correct that if we start with a 261, then a 461 is a natural partner. Similarly, the case for a 400 with a 661 is logical.
  23. I'd agree totally. I "upgraded" an ancient 023 to a 251 years ago. I never liked it, slow to warm up, lacking in power. I've put up with it till last year, when I bit the bullet and got a 261. The reason why I got the 261, even though the 251 seems to have eventually bedded in, or I've got used to it? On the advice of folk on here who know these things, I bought a 400 to replace an even older 038. After using that, I had to have the 261. They're both a joy to use, I reckon either would suit you, but if you are rarely going to need a 20" bar, the 261 would be my choice. The one thing I would say is be very careful about buying a used chainsaw privately. I'd only do that from a dealer.
  24. Peter 1955

    461 value

    I have no idea at all about a 461, but I agree about the 400 with a 20" light bar. It makes the 038 it replaced seem vastly underpowered and hugely overweight. As for the 261, mine thinks it's a 400. ๐Ÿ˜„ What a saw.
  25. Don't get me started on that one! Years ago, I saw a heap of Makita battery kit in B&Q, at unbelievable prices. I'd have had my trolley filled so full that I'd have struggled to push it, had I not seen the disclaimer in tiny writing " not compatible with Makstar equipment ". You and me ( and probably many others ) both.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK. ย 
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place. ย If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,ย ย then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

ร—
ร—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.