GarethM
-
Posts
5,341 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by GarethM
-
So what were those 72m then ?. Ah yes, it doesn't suit your rather head in the sands reality that people who are tourists visit whomever is the president. Hell, I went to Scotland under Nicola, it didn't put me off going. Granted I didn't stop off at Gretna for a shotgun wedding or find a duty free shop she was promising.
-
Erm, tourists tend to go home at the end of the holiday, unless that's a new Disney holiday option?. Immigrants, not so much. Granted unlike here Donald seems to be making them go home or not get in. Maybe that's why you don't understand the difference between immigration and tourist?.
-
-
Generally speaking, water and sewage pipework is the responsibility of the property owner once it's over the boundary. Whilst they were trying to make that to the property, mainly for the average terrace homeowners where it's just a couple of metres, it wouldn't be for a laird unless it's a new housing estate that's getting adopted. Plus, Scottish water is still state owned isn't it?.
-
Says the man with zero experience
-
Get out not in personally.
-
Nobody knows what he's been up to, but you've spent all of it thinking about him that's for sure.
-
FFS, if you want to send him dick pics just use private messages.
-
Erm, TSS would be more of a lady thing.
-
Think SP has a thing for the Swedish Gunter. That's a proper duck pout.
-
Why not clarify what type of south Africans they are giving preferential treatment. Well....
-
Nice to see SP has been out of the house and onto the streets of Glasgow this morning with his camera. Granted it's a bit creepy to make a collage, but suppose it's better than getting arrested with your protesting mates
-
Possible to dispute the view of a tree officer?
GarethM replied to ArthurJob's topic in Trees and the Law
Well someone left the keys in the front door didn't they. -
Possible to dispute the view of a tree officer?
GarethM replied to ArthurJob's topic in Trees and the Law
Well, off you pop to buy it from the developer and save it from a executive home future then. But like most auw isn't that beautiful it should be protected types, it never seems to be from their own pockets. -
I think SP is more of a Walter than conspiracy theorists, granted the two aren't mutually exclusive.
-
I thought the conspiracy guys had been added to the rainbow alphabet?.
-
I'm sure that's up on the wall in your spare room, with loads more paper clippings, red string and brass tacks like some conspiracy theorists wet dream. Or is there a bimonthly meeting above some random Starbucks with one guesses the obligatory tin foil hats but you must remember the loyalty card for the free coffee?.
-
And yet again more TDS. Remind me again what post Donald holds, compared to you embarrassing yourself with an almost addictive level of Donald internet searching as your track history of backing "political winners" is a bit poor. Plus I don't drink and neither does Donald, so yes I would. He ain't Jimmy, very clear distinction. No doubt you'll go on about morals Jada Jada. That why you drink alone I guess.
-
Waffle waffle waffle, two faced changing tune. And unlike yourself I've always been pretty even handed with Donald. I just don't spend every waking moment trawling the internet for more "gotcha" TDS bs.
-
Neighbour's application to cut back my tpo'd tree
GarethM replied to LilyLangtree's topic in Trees and the Law
But guv it was parkside, say nufink more off you pop. -
Neighbour's application to cut back my tpo'd tree
GarethM replied to LilyLangtree's topic in Trees and the Law
You know the rules, touching another man's wifey is forgivable, touching another man's saw is like sleeping with his mother infront of you!. -
Neighbour's application to cut back my tpo'd tree
GarethM replied to LilyLangtree's topic in Trees and the Law
Planning permission is just the council saying what you're proposing is legal. It doesn't legally allow you access, with the exception of say CPO. Using a hypothetical, Tesco could put in for a superstore on me and 15 neighbours and it gets granted. Whilst they have permission for the build they have no right of access or ownership. -
Not a clue, thought it was from those huge reservoirs between stoke and Macclesfield that are large enough for the QE2?.
-
How many pages of you shouting trump is a bad man or he's a sexy pest, or have you totally forgotten what you've said in TDS induced rage ?.
-
Canal can be as it's mostly just composted greenery and stuff from boaters excluding the toilet waste. Reservoirs are very different as it's basically river silt that's ultra fine particles that's washes down from the hills as they do pre filter sand out in a network of baffles. One is like compost the other is quarry waste.
