Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

David Humphries

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    23,484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by David Humphries

  1. Recent wet and warm weather has certainly made the season fruitful. Great to get the young ones inspired, good work. .
  2. Clathrus (from the stink horn family) is about the only Genus I can think of that may open the door for an Id.
  3. no idea either, sure its not the rotting guts of a pig?
  4. By David Humphries aged 48 and ¾ I often read and see with great interest (and with more than a tad of jealousy), the various exploits of the host of climbers both young and mature that gallivant around the northern and southern hemisphere, exploring & climbing some of the world’s oldest and tallest tree specimens. The majority of my own humble climbing career took place in and around London during the 1990’s when we were still battling both the tree and the climbing equipment to get up & into the canopy. I moved away from climbing on a day to day basis into a supervisory/management role (something I’m starting to regret if I’m honest, as it was a bit too early) and have ended up as the Trees Management Officer for the City of London Corporation looking after the (20,000) tree population at one of London’s finest Open Spaces – Hampstead Heath. I continued climbing by playing around the rocky playgrounds of the south coast and cairngorms, but even that time came to an end due to family commitents. My interaction these days is more around the managing and organizing of climbing works on mature, veteran and ancient trees rather than clambering about them. Although I still get the itch to pull a harness on it seldom materializes and pretty much has become in reality something I used to do rather than something I actually do. So when an opportunity came knocking in 2009 to have a week of climbing in the Basque region of Spain to learn from and assess/measure lapsed ancient Beech pollards for a Conservation Arb project, I pulled rank and jumped the queue in the team (much to the annoyance of some of my colleagues) to offer up my rusty climbing skills for the cause. I borrowed a tree motion and learnt a few (new to me) friction hitches to go with the hitch climber (again, new to me) to help me get back up amongst the leaves. The trip was organised by Helen Read (Ecologist/Conservation Officer at Burnham Beeches) It was part of an on-going European wide study she had undertaken looking at traditional and sustainable pollarding practices and an opportunity for a group of Ecologists and Arborists from the City of London, together with a couple of members of the Ancient Tree Forum, to climb, record and evaluate regrowth and failure of a number of trees that had been worked on three years previously using a trial of experimental pollarding techniques carried out by a collaboration of Spanish, Swiss and British Arbs. These techniques included using both axe and chainsaw and cutting the lapsed poles at various heights. The data would hopefully build a blue print of how and when to return very old lapsed pollards back in to cycle, to a state where vitality is enhanced and self-destruction via decay and biomechanical stress was mitigated. The Ecological importance of these trees continuing to be being maintained, both in mainland Europe and back here in the UK is considerable. They support the micro habitats of a vast range of fungi, lichen, invertebrates, mammal and avian life with many of these being the on Red data lists of threatened species. The trees themselves were spread across large tracts of hill and lower mountain side on common pastures and traditionally used for domestic fuel or as wood for charcoal used in the coastal iron foundries. Some were also shaped to provide particular curves and forks which were used in ship building. Most UK pollards have been lapsed for over a hundred years but the pollards in the Basque have been more recently cut and there are still people around who remember how & when to cut them. Meeting one such local was a privilege and inspiration and has left me with a far deeper understanding of mans’ place in nature. We travelled down to the Basque country by train via Paris and spent a week between the two sites of Oieleku and Leitza. Stunning areas of natural beauty! My camera was never out of my hand. We had a little bit of R&R involving site visits fung’ hunting and imbibing the local fuel but were mostly focused on the task at hand. Splitting into teams of climber and recorders, we climbed the 40 pollards that were cut a few years before. Due to their history and nature they were not monster trees in any imagination, the majority being stumpy old gnarly things but a few were around the 50/60’ mark. The climbing was interesting as the roots and trunks were significantly decade and structurally compromised. We were also mindful not to break any of the newly formed epicormic and adventitious shoots. The old cut stubs were sometimes covered with a moss mat to protect them from the sun and drying out. Rock Lizards had made their homes under these and the loose bark and cavities had resident bats. We recorded and measured if the branches were alive or dead, number of eruptions of new shoots, length of extension growth from terminal bud scar and whether the stubs were showing callous, and how far below the dead stubs if there was any live cambium. The data was sent off for collating to a UK University and the findings were published in The Arboricultural Journal in January 2013. ‘Restoration of lapsed beech pollards: Evaluation of techniques and guidance for future work’ Helen J. Read, Jeremy Dagley, Jose Miguel Elosegui, Alvaro Sicilia & C. P. Wheater Lots of variables, but if time, vigour and expense allow, then ‘gradual’ pollard restoration is the way to go. The less leaf area removed enables the trees to generate more energy and produce a better response from dormant shoots, leading to fewer pollards likely to fail and die. This was a fascinating and inspiring trip to be involved with and opened many doors for me with my own thoughts and experiences around veteran tree management and also gaining access to like minded individuals who are much further down the road to understanding and appreciating tree ecology. I also got to learn a little about the fascinating culture that is the Basque & its people. Here's a link to an earlier thread of images from the trip......... I’ve not really climbed much since, (last time was a parting team image for our apprentice, below) There’s been the odd tree inspection here and there, and I know I’ll regret stopping being a tree climber for a living but my passion with trees has taken me down a different path which I still thoroughly enjoy. The Basque climbs were a nice way to put a full stop at the end of my climbing career and I’ll reflect back on it with good memories. David Humphries Trees Management Officer City of London Open Spaces Hampstead Heath [email protected]
  5. I just got 671 results from searching for Tar bricks. (Your post above came back first and the thread came back second. I suspect you were searching for it whilst you were in a specific forum? Try using the search facility whilst in the home section, it will then search the whole site.
  6. Agree with tree anion, not Meripilus. these are mushrooms would need to see an under shot of the stem and gills to try and work an Id. .
  7. 'some' of the mycorrhizal Bolete family.... Boletus edulis - cep, penny bun, porcini (1-3) Neoboletus luridiformis - dotted stem bolete (4-6) Boletus luridus - lurid bolete (7-8) Boletus radicans - rooting bolete (9-11) Boletus satanus - satan's bolete (12-13) Buchwaldoboletus liginicola - wood bolete (14-15) Leccinum aurantiacum - orange oak bolete (16-17) Leccinum crocipodium - safron bolete (18-19) Leccinum duriusculum - slate bolete (20-21) Leccinum scabrum - birch bolete (22-23) Suillelus queletii - deceiving bolete (24-26) Suillus granulatus - weeping bolete (27-29) Suillelus grevillei - larch bolete (30-32) Xerocomellus chrysenteron - red cracking bolete (33)
  8. Nice find. Amazing place Wistmans Wood, hey .
  9. Out at Sculthorpe Fen today in Norfolk. Fair amount of myco's about around the birch, alder, hazel and ash including Leccinum scabrum (birch bolete), death caps and the blusher
  10. Looks to be a significant root girdle going on which may have an influence on the vitality of the vascular cambium on that section of the tree, which could pave the way for secondary infections. might be worth excavating that area to look for rhizomorphs. .
  11. Have you considered other pathogens like Armillaria? .
  12. More mushies for tea but the field parasols were bit too far gone to use sadly. The horse mushrooms were pretty tasty though.
  13. Road kill from yesterday provided part of this mornings breakfast.....
  14. Looks like a very enjoyable and informative day Paul. Both Nod and Paul have a very relaxed and knowledgeable aura which makes them natural teachers .
  15. also how to go about managing a tree with a known species that is colonising a part of a tree where it is not known to usually inhabit Eg, Psuedoinonotus dryadeus fruiting and decaying wood at the top of trunks rather than at the base of a tree where it may be subject to differing loads.
  16. Hi David Couple of thoughts.... How to manage a tree with multiple species of decay fungi occurring at the same time with different types of wood decay, and succession of decay fungi occuring on the same host over time.
  17. These are Colybia fusipes, the spindle shank. .
  18. Red oak at Hampstead that failed at the roots, we left it for kids to have a natural climbing frame .
  19. Interesting angle on why there may be mast years..... "variable acorn production is an important way that oaks increase the probability that the acorns they produce will evade predators and survive to germination" http://calag.ucanr.edu/Archive/?article=ca.v049n05p7 .
  20. David Humphries, City of London Corporation Trees Management Officer, takes a look at a maintained population of standing dead trees (SDTs – aka monoliths) within the context of a large well-used urban open space – Hampstead Heath. In total the City of London Corporation runs 11,000 acres of green space across the capital. Site history Hampstead Heath is one of London’s most popular open spaces. Its mosaic of habitats provides a resource for wildlife just 6km from Trafalgar Square. At 791 acres it is spread across three London boroughs (Barnet, Camden and Haringey), and is preserved in its semi-natural state by North London Open Spaces (NLOS), a division of the City of London Corporation. It is an island of beautiful ‘urban countryside’ whose magic lies not only in its rich wildlife and extensive sports and recreational opportunities, but also in its proximity and accessibility to millions of people. As a Site of Metropolitan Importance, Hampstead Heath provides buffer land to the neighbouring SSSI (English Heritage’s Kenwood Estate) and is of national as well as regional importance, hosting a number of priority species identified in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, including lesser spotted woodpecker, bullfinch, stag beetle and grass snake. #jscode# Having worked on this open space for almost three decades, I’ve had the opportunity to witness both natural and management changes over that period. The site has endured a number of significant storms (including the hurricane of 1987) which have altered the Heath and the perception of those who work on it and those who enjoy it. Hampstead Heath’s mosaic of habitats provides a resource for wildlife and people just 6km from Trafalgar Square. Over the years, storms have altered the Heath and the perception of those who work on it and those who enjoy it. Although the site has a healthy history of woodland and grassland conservation management for decades, the generic attitude towards dying, dead or fallen trees had been to clear them up, processing all but the very bare bones of the trees with little or scant understanding of the ecology that resided on and within them. This was a Victorian legacy born of a desire to sanitise urban green areas. It wasn’t until the Rio Earth Summit in the early 1990s that attitudes really started to change regarding dead wood and its importance as habitat for biodiversity. Naturalists took this opportunity to highlight the fragile ecosystems that were home and hunting grounds to a myriad of fungi, arthropods, mammals and birds and the need to protect them. I was a product of that ‘old school’ having started on my apprenticeship in the 1980s, learning my trade from the ‘tree cutters’, and have had to change my own work practices and views first before being able to help bring about a local sea change amongst my colleagues for the benefit of the local tree ecology. I realised that there was more to learning than just racking up the City & Guilds and CS units, but it wasn’t until an opportunity arose to spend a week on a workshop in East Anglia with Oliver Rackham during the mid- 1990s looking at the history and ecology of our woodlands and landscape that I was introduced to the work of Dr Helen Read, Dr David Lonsdale and Ted Green. This inspired me to visit sites with a rich understanding and history of managing trees and their ecological importance within their environment, such as Burnham Beeches and the forests of Hatfield, Windsor and Staverton Park. The Heath has a number of fine veterans (bottom) but none of the age of the trees at the sites mentioned above. However, it does host wildlife that depends on the characteristic features of the ancient trees such as decay pockets, cavities and retained dead wood and wherever possible (with a mind to public safety target management) we now keep ‘dysfunctional’ trees standing as long as we can safely maintain them. The Heath has a number of fine veterans and hosts wildlife that depends on the characteristic features of ancient trees such as decay pockets, cavities and retained dead wood. Older monoliths that have escaped the chainsaw by virtue of not being in open access areas near to paths/roads. As well as managing the declining trees for their habitat and structural issues, there is now a population of dead standing trees on the Heath. These have been gradually growing in numbers and diversity over the last decade or so. These more recently created standing dead wood volumes supplement the few but significantly older monoliths (examples above) that have escaped the chainsaw by virtue of not being in open access areas near to paths/ roads etc., but which are within hedgerows and woodland. I have looked at dead trees in various woodlands on my travels, and the more obvious difference between naturally disintegrating dead trees and man-made monoliths would appear to be the retention of a greater percentage of the lateral branches and canopy wood on the unmanaged ones. Depending on species, these branches can stay attached to their parent stems for many decades, providing different types of niche habitats for a diversity of saproxylic species (living on and feeding in dead and decaying wood). With a mandate of managing both the safety of the public and the biodiversity of the local ecology we have tried to create our monoliths with the retention of greater range of branch diameters and taper than had previously been tried on the site, with a mind to retaining these micro- and macro-niche habitats as safely as we can. In time these branches do deteriorate and become a greater hazard, so after inspection they periodically get reduced in length and volume. The oak on the right has part ‘self-dismantled’ (where it was left unreduced away from the target of the path) and has also been worked down on a couple of occasions to a point where we can now leave it for a longer period of time to disintegrate at its own pace. This oak was reduced on the side overhanging a target and then a few years later reduced further because of a cross-country route within its fall zone. The heavy reduction and subsequent two-phase dead hedge at its base, plus cross country re-route, mean this SDT can now be left until it falls. In another example, a declining oak (above) was reduced on the side overhanging a target (a cross-country route within its fall zone) and then a few years later further reduced down to retain the tree as a tighter monolith because of a cross-country route within its fall zone. This more than 800cm dbh oak tree has significant basal and branch wood brown rot from the presence of Laetiporus sulphureus. As such, this tree had been target assessed and deemed to be not only too unstable to leave, but too unstable to climb and reduce, so a mobile elevated work platform (MEWP) was utilised. The heavy reduction and subsequent two- phase dead hedge at its base, plus cross- country re-route, mean this SDT can now be left until it falls. Target assessment and monitoring The site has an ever-increasing population of retained dead standing trees (DSTs), so it is important to catalogue, plot and monitor them. In 2008 a survey of the historic and recently created monoliths was undertaken. These were then numbered and plotted onto a map. Yellow markers indicate DSTs; red indicate fallen and felled ones. The population is now inspected annually and the map and list are updated according to any changes in condition, including vandalism (like arson), state of decay and failure incidence. Currently the population numbers 70+, and is made up of a wide range of species including ash, oak, beech, hornbeam, elm, willow, birch, wild service, lime, maple, horse chestnut and London plane. Failures Species choice for consideration for retention is a significant factor. For example, willow will not endure decay and the associated lignin-destroying white rots (like Ganoderma) and gravity as long as oak and its associated cellulose- destroying brown rots (like Laetiporus) will. The willow below was reduced to a monolith in 2009 and fell in 2013. It had been programmed in for a further 3m reduction within 12 months of its failure. As a result of this, we are now more considered about where and how high we leave dead/declining species like willow and lime. Management An alternative to using a MEWP or rope access may involve pulling off individual branches or sections of trunk at different heights (dependent on the state of decay and colonizing species). The beech here had been standing dead as a 10m monolith for five years before the decision was made to further reduce it. The white willow opposite has had three reductions over a 10-year period. The last (2013) involved removing a delaminating section of the remaining stem. This tree is now low enough to be left to disintegrate down to a pile within its own time-frame. The cubical brown rot will continue to provide a home for many wood-boring insects. It has been suggested by safety and ecology managers that monoliths within an urban environment should ideally be no higher than 3–4m. This is a view that limits the amount of wood volume available as habitat and restricts biological diversity. Consideration of the location of maintained dead standing trees should be at the forefront of any risk assessment before a decision is made to manage a monolith. If there is significant target then the initial and/or final height should not be within falling distance of the target. A large Meripilus giganteus-colonised roadside beech has been brought down to a 6m fractured and coroneted monolith(see below). If there is sufficient space for taller SDTs, and they are away from target and ‘monitored’, then the overall retained height has restrictions only based on its own decaying bulk and its stability. This white willow has had three reductions over a 10-year period. The last (2013) involved removing a delaminating section of the remaining stem. A large Meripilus giganteus-infected roadside beech brought down to a 6m fractured and coroneted monolith. A spilt oak monolith in open woodland reduced to about 14m and an ash within a park (hosting stag beetles) reduced to 2m. Ecology associated with dead wood In the UK there are close to 5000 individual invertebrate and fungi species to be found living in or on dead wood volumes. There are: 754 Coleoptera spp. (beetles), 737 Diptera spp. (flies etc.), 178 Hymenoptera spp. (ants, bees, wasps etc.), 46 Lepidoptera spp. (moths and butterflies) and 3216 fungi spp., including brackets, toadstools and jelly and slime moulds. Many of these species are uncommon and even rare or Red Data listed and have biodiversity action plans associated with them. A number of these species can be found within the dead wood on and around Hampstead Heath. Having these identified is a fundamental part of knowing what and how to manage the dead wood on the site. In addition to having access to an ongoing annual survey of the fungi at Hampstead Heath and the neighbouring Kenwood Estate (A. Overall), we commissioned an entomology report (D. Hackett) in 2010 to assess the value of the Heath’s saproxylic fauna within its regional context. It comprised a survey of 18 of the monoliths from various habitat types across the site. These ranged from woodland and wood edge to pond side and grassland. They were of varying age classes, structure types, states of decay and species (oak, maple, ash, beech, hornbeam and elm). The survey was carried out during the summer months. 26 species of beetle not previously noted on the site were recorded (including Stictoleptura scutellata, Pyrochroa coccinea, Grammoptera ustulata and Cryptophagus micaceus). Top, left to right: female stag beetle (Lucanus cervus), great tit (Parus major), black-headed cardinal beetle (Pyrochroa coccinea). Middle: beefsteak fungi (Fistulina hepatica) with unknown bee species, pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus sp.), many zoned rosette (Podoscypha multizonata). Bottom: lesser stag beetle habitat, bearded tooth fungi (Hericium erinaceus), hoof fungus (Fomes fomentarius). Examples of the monoliths from the survey are reproduced below: The results (and ensuing discussions) from this survey suggest that the site has a good habitat range for the targeted species and would rank well in the regional (southern England) league table for its SQI (Saproxylic Quality Index). This has encouraged us to continue to monitor, create and maintain this valuable habitat type. Many of the trees described in this article are featured in a VETree video about the creation of decaying wood habitats. This will be available for free download and distribution from the VETree website (www. vetree.eu). Acknowledgements I am grateful to Neville Fay (Treework Environmental Practice) for his valuable comments. References Bobiec, A., J. Gutowski, W. Laundeslayer, P. Pawlaczyk and K. Zub. The Afterlife of a Tree. WWF Poland, 2005. Hackett, D. Hampstead Heath Monolith Survey. 2010. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC). Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. Volume II: Action Plans. Tranche 1, volume 2. JNCC, 1995. Lonsdale, D. (ed.). Ancient and other veteran trees: further guidance on management. The Tree Council, 2013. Read, H. Veteran Trees: A guide to good management. English Nature, 2000. All images are the author’s own: david. [email protected] First published in the ARB Magazine, Issue 166, Autumn 2014 View full article
  21. David Humphries, City of London Corporation Trees Management Officer, takes a look at a maintained population of standing dead trees (SDTs – aka monoliths) within the context of a large well-used urban open space – Hampstead Heath. In total the City of London Corporation runs 11,000 acres of green space across the capital. Site history Hampstead Heath is one of London’s most popular open spaces. Its mosaic of habitats provides a resource for wildlife just 6km from Trafalgar Square. At 791 acres it is spread across three London boroughs (Barnet, Camden and Haringey), and is preserved in its semi-natural state by North London Open Spaces (NLOS), a division of the City of London Corporation. It is an island of beautiful ‘urban countryside’ whose magic lies not only in its rich wildlife and extensive sports and recreational opportunities, but also in its proximity and accessibility to millions of people. As a Site of Metropolitan Importance, Hampstead Heath provides buffer land to the neighbouring SSSI (English Heritage’s Kenwood Estate) and is of national as well as regional importance, hosting a number of priority species identified in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, including lesser spotted woodpecker, bullfinch, stag beetle and grass snake. Having worked on this open space for almost three decades, I’ve had the opportunity to witness both natural and management changes over that period. The site has endured a number of significant storms (including the hurricane of 1987) which have altered the Heath and the perception of those who work on it and those who enjoy it. Hampstead Heath’s mosaic of habitats provides a resource for wildlife and people just 6km from Trafalgar Square. Over the years, storms have altered the Heath and the perception of those who work on it and those who enjoy it. Although the site has a healthy history of woodland and grassland conservation management for decades, the generic attitude towards dying, dead or fallen trees had been to clear them up, processing all but the very bare bones of the trees with little or scant understanding of the ecology that resided on and within them. This was a Victorian legacy born of a desire to sanitise urban green areas. It wasn’t until the Rio Earth Summit in the early 1990s that attitudes really started to change regarding dead wood and its importance as habitat for biodiversity. Naturalists took this opportunity to highlight the fragile ecosystems that were home and hunting grounds to a myriad of fungi, arthropods, mammals and birds and the need to protect them. I was a product of that ‘old school’ having started on my apprenticeship in the 1980s, learning my trade from the ‘tree cutters’, and have had to change my own work practices and views first before being able to help bring about a local sea change amongst my colleagues for the benefit of the local tree ecology. I realised that there was more to learning than just racking up the City & Guilds and CS units, but it wasn’t until an opportunity arose to spend a week on a workshop in East Anglia with Oliver Rackham during the mid- 1990s looking at the history and ecology of our woodlands and landscape that I was introduced to the work of Dr Helen Read, Dr David Lonsdale and Ted Green. This inspired me to visit sites with a rich understanding and history of managing trees and their ecological importance within their environment, such as Burnham Beeches and the forests of Hatfield, Windsor and Staverton Park. The Heath has a number of fine veterans (bottom) but none of the age of the trees at the sites mentioned above. However, it does host wildlife that depends on the characteristic features of the ancient trees such as decay pockets, cavities and retained dead wood and wherever possible (with a mind to public safety target management) we now keep ‘dysfunctional’ trees standing as long as we can safely maintain them. The Heath has a number of fine veterans and hosts wildlife that depends on the characteristic features of ancient trees such as decay pockets, cavities and retained dead wood. Older monoliths that have escaped the chainsaw by virtue of not being in open access areas near to paths/roads. As well as managing the declining trees for their habitat and structural issues, there is now a population of dead standing trees on the Heath. These have been gradually growing in numbers and diversity over the last decade or so. These more recently created standing dead wood volumes supplement the few but significantly older monoliths (examples above) that have escaped the chainsaw by virtue of not being in open access areas near to paths/ roads etc., but which are within hedgerows and woodland. I have looked at dead trees in various woodlands on my travels, and the more obvious difference between naturally disintegrating dead trees and man-made monoliths would appear to be the retention of a greater percentage of the lateral branches and canopy wood on the unmanaged ones. Depending on species, these branches can stay attached to their parent stems for many decades, providing different types of niche habitats for a diversity of saproxylic species (living on and feeding in dead and decaying wood). With a mandate of managing both the safety of the public and the biodiversity of the local ecology we have tried to create our monoliths with the retention of greater range of branch diameters and taper than had previously been tried on the site, with a mind to retaining these micro- and macro-niche habitats as safely as we can. In time these branches do deteriorate and become a greater hazard, so after inspection they periodically get reduced in length and volume. The oak on the right has part ‘self-dismantled’ (where it was left unreduced away from the target of the path) and has also been worked down on a couple of occasions to a point where we can now leave it for a longer period of time to disintegrate at its own pace. This oak was reduced on the side overhanging a target and then a few years later reduced further because of a cross-country route within its fall zone. The heavy reduction and subsequent two-phase dead hedge at its base, plus cross country re-route, mean this SDT can now be left until it falls. In another example, a declining oak (above) was reduced on the side overhanging a target (a cross-country route within its fall zone) and then a few years later further reduced down to retain the tree as a tighter monolith because of a cross-country route within its fall zone. This more than 800cm dbh oak tree has significant basal and branch wood brown rot from the presence of Laetiporus sulphureus. As such, this tree had been target assessed and deemed to be not only too unstable to leave, but too unstable to climb and reduce, so a mobile elevated work platform (MEWP) was utilised. The heavy reduction and subsequent two- phase dead hedge at its base, plus cross- country re-route, mean this SDT can now be left until it falls. Target assessment and monitoring The site has an ever-increasing population of retained dead standing trees (DSTs), so it is important to catalogue, plot and monitor them. In 2008 a survey of the historic and recently created monoliths was undertaken. These were then numbered and plotted onto a map. Yellow markers indicate DSTs; red indicate fallen and felled ones. The population is now inspected annually and the map and list are updated according to any changes in condition, including vandalism (like arson), state of decay and failure incidence. Currently the population numbers 70+, and is made up of a wide range of species including ash, oak, beech, hornbeam, elm, willow, birch, wild service, lime, maple, horse chestnut and London plane. Failures Species choice for consideration for retention is a significant factor. For example, willow will not endure decay and the associated lignin-destroying white rots (like Ganoderma) and gravity as long as oak and its associated cellulose- destroying brown rots (like Laetiporus) will. The willow below was reduced to a monolith in 2009 and fell in 2013. It had been programmed in for a further 3m reduction within 12 months of its failure. As a result of this, we are now more considered about where and how high we leave dead/declining species like willow and lime. Management An alternative to using a MEWP or rope access may involve pulling off individual branches or sections of trunk at different heights (dependent on the state of decay and colonizing species). The beech here had been standing dead as a 10m monolith for five years before the decision was made to further reduce it. The white willow opposite has had three reductions over a 10-year period. The last (2013) involved removing a delaminating section of the remaining stem. This tree is now low enough to be left to disintegrate down to a pile within its own time-frame. The cubical brown rot will continue to provide a home for many wood-boring insects. It has been suggested by safety and ecology managers that monoliths within an urban environment should ideally be no higher than 3–4m. This is a view that limits the amount of wood volume available as habitat and restricts biological diversity. Consideration of the location of maintained dead standing trees should be at the forefront of any risk assessment before a decision is made to manage a monolith. If there is significant target then the initial and/or final height should not be within falling distance of the target. A large Meripilus giganteus-colonised roadside beech has been brought down to a 6m fractured and coroneted monolith(see below). If there is sufficient space for taller SDTs, and they are away from target and ‘monitored’, then the overall retained height has restrictions only based on its own decaying bulk and its stability. This white willow has had three reductions over a 10-year period. The last (2013) involved removing a delaminating section of the remaining stem. A large Meripilus giganteus-infected roadside beech brought down to a 6m fractured and coroneted monolith. A spilt oak monolith in open woodland reduced to about 14m and an ash within a park (hosting stag beetles) reduced to 2m. Ecology associated with dead wood In the UK there are close to 5000 individual invertebrate and fungi species to be found living in or on dead wood volumes. There are: 754 Coleoptera spp. (beetles), 737 Diptera spp. (flies etc.), 178 Hymenoptera spp. (ants, bees, wasps etc.), 46 Lepidoptera spp. (moths and butterflies) and 3216 fungi spp., including brackets, toadstools and jelly and slime moulds. Many of these species are uncommon and even rare or Red Data listed and have biodiversity action plans associated with them. A number of these species can be found within the dead wood on and around Hampstead Heath. Having these identified is a fundamental part of knowing what and how to manage the dead wood on the site. In addition to having access to an ongoing annual survey of the fungi at Hampstead Heath and the neighbouring Kenwood Estate (A. Overall), we commissioned an entomology report (D. Hackett) in 2010 to assess the value of the Heath’s saproxylic fauna within its regional context. It comprised a survey of 18 of the monoliths from various habitat types across the site. These ranged from woodland and wood edge to pond side and grassland. They were of varying age classes, structure types, states of decay and species (oak, maple, ash, beech, hornbeam and elm). The survey was carried out during the summer months. 26 species of beetle not previously noted on the site were recorded (including Stictoleptura scutellata, Pyrochroa coccinea, Grammoptera ustulata and Cryptophagus micaceus). Top, left to right: female stag beetle (Lucanus cervus), great tit (Parus major), black-headed cardinal beetle (Pyrochroa coccinea). Middle: beefsteak fungi (Fistulina hepatica) with unknown bee species, pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus sp.), many zoned rosette (Podoscypha multizonata). Bottom: lesser stag beetle habitat, bearded tooth fungi (Hericium erinaceus), hoof fungus (Fomes fomentarius). Examples of the monoliths from the survey are reproduced below: The results (and ensuing discussions) from this survey suggest that the site has a good habitat range for the targeted species and would rank well in the regional (southern England) league table for its SQI (Saproxylic Quality Index). This has encouraged us to continue to monitor, create and maintain this valuable habitat type. Many of the trees described in this article are featured in a VETree video about the creation of decaying wood habitats. This will be available for free download and distribution from the VETree website (www. vetree.eu). Acknowledgements I am grateful to Neville Fay (Treework Environmental Practice) for his valuable comments. References Bobiec, A., J. Gutowski, W. Laundeslayer, P. Pawlaczyk and K. Zub. The Afterlife of a Tree. WWF Poland, 2005. Hackett, D. Hampstead Heath Monolith Survey. 2010. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC). Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. Volume II: Action Plans. Tranche 1, volume 2. JNCC, 1995. Lonsdale, D. (ed.). Ancient and other veteran trees: further guidance on management. The Tree Council, 2013. Read, H. Veteran Trees: A guide to good management. English Nature, 2000. All images are the author’s own: david. [email protected] First published in the ARB Magazine, Issue 166, Autumn 2014
  22. Golf course worker has been seriously injured by a falling tree whilst at work hope his injuries are not too serious, thoughts with him, his family and his co-workers. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-40814709 .

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.