I think the arguments are going full circle here. I believe we are all in agreement, really.
I have never claimed otherwise. In my very first post, I compared "raw" rapeseed oils with rapeseed oils with additives to reduce oxidation and increase viscosity. I never compared rapeseed oils to mineral based oils. In this comparison, I pointed out that storage may be a factor:
Furthermore, not all professional equipment gets used all year round. As an example, my pole saw gets used only very infrequently, and consequently, I use mineral based chain oil for that saw. Some of my other (professional) saws occasionally sit on the shelf for weeks or months, and I don't like having to remember to empty and clean the oil from the saws, as I never know how long the saws will stay unused for.
As I read the comments from the "chainsaw repair" guys on this forum, they repair chainsaws from professional users that have "gummed up". So it seems to be an issue with professional users. These are most certainly caused by vegetable based oils, which could be untreaded (or badly treated) rapeseed oils. Wouldn't it be valuable to find out what kind of oils causes most "gumming up" problems? I certainly think so.
There is no doubt in my mind that, all other things being equal, Bio chain oils (AFAIK, all rapeseed based) with viscosity additives and anti oxidant additives have superior lubrication properties and less/slower "gumming up" properties than untreated ("raw") rapeseed oil. That is likely to be the reason why the manufacturers go to those lengths to add those additives to the rapeseed oils.
On the other hand, you can buy untreated rapeseed oil considerably cheaper than "official" bio chain oils, and your chainsaw usage patterns supports the use of untreated rapeseed oil, I wouldn't dream of discouraging the use (and never have been).
I see this as a very relevant discussion, not a "fight". If I have made that impression, I am sorry.