Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Before, during and after.


John Hancock
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nice old Oak pollard in Warndon Villages, Worcester. The spec was a 30% crown reduction, partly to take weight off those large old limbs but also because of a questionable subsidence issue on a conservatory at the house on the left of the picture.

 

Climber was Matthew, all work carried out with a Silky. Think we ended up with about 25% in the end, anymore and it would have looked awful.

 

The work was carried out without prejudice.

 

I’ll look at the tree again in two years time and see if there is an inner crown is developing, if there is we’ll take a little more off.

597654c2e2b64_DSC_0877(Large).jpg.c73fcc7541a9da5dad6b3c973003d65c.jpg

597654c2e0835_DSC_0873(Large).jpg.ab14a952f73a4938c3c94939e6b86f50.jpg

597654c2dc863_DSC_0871(Large).jpg.6b1977971252294274e7a94a2aef7dc5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice old Oak pollard in Warndon Villages, Worcester. The spec was a 30% crown reduction, partly to take weight off those large old limbs but also because of a questionable subsidence issue on a conservatory at the house on the left of the picture.

 

Hortlink, research sugest 70-90% reduction required to have any impact on tree induced subsidence.. So what you've done is fine for endweighting and looks good but if your doing it to prevent subsidence it's not nearly enough..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

70-90% reduction, getting to the stage of pollarding it arnt you when you talk about Those kinda numbers? :)

 

Not my numbers, from the BRE:

 

Pruning trees to reduce water use

Summaries of research; conclusions and

recommendations IP7/06

Hipps, Atkinson and Griffiths

 

Recommendations

● For consistent soil moisture conservation,

severe crown reduction of 70–90% of crown

volume would have to be applied. Reduction of

up to 50% crown volume is not always effective

for decreasing soil drying

● To ensure a continued decrease in canopy leaf

area and to maximise the period of soil moisture

conservation, crown reductions should be

repeated on a regular managed cycle with an

interval based on monitoring regrowth

● Crown thinning may be aesthetically desirable

but is not an effective method to control soil

drying by trees

 

Basically reducing trees to prevent subsidence is not an option..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.