Making the news today....

[Mark J]

Ok did that. All he said was he wanted a difficult conversation about cutting funding to Isis sympathetic states. I agree with this but doesn't respond to my point that he doesn't want them shot on sight in the act of terror and has also said there's nothing wrong with believing in radical Islam, or fighting for Isis and coming back to Britain?

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Arbtalk mobile app

 

Armed Coppers are trained to shoot when necessary. That's whay they exist. I strongly doubt that any PM could or would change that by much.

[dan494]

Armed Coppers are trained to shoot when necessary. That's whay they exist. I strongly doubt that any PM could or would change that by much.

38 seconds in, incase you've not seen it before

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Arbtalk mobile app

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

So we just roll over and accept the attacks as part and parcel of everyday life?

 

Nobody is saying that the perpetrator isn't responsible for the act, but who is responsible for the opportunity to commit the act unimpeded?

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGb3mcuiH-Y

 

 

(1) No, round up the watch list and throw them in the Atlantic (mid.)

 

(2) Too bizarre for me

 

😁

[Haironyourchest]

They'd be placed in a maximum security prison to serve a whole life term without the possibility of parole.

 

 

.

 

Too expensive. If they are native born but identify as a member of Islamic State, then they should be dropped off in whatever bit of desert is ISIS territory. Send them to the Caliphate they claim to be a member of. And let them starve in the desert. The Caliphate can be allowed to exist as essentially an open air prison...internment in which will carry a de-facto death sentance.

Edited June 5, 2017 by Haironyourchest

[Mark J]

You admit that copper's right in what he says then.

So, cut away then - what, in your opinion, is a 'safe' number of police, and should we then apply the same rationale to our armed forces? After all, we hardly ever need them, and as for Trident - well, same thinking applies, surely?

Still, at least if they're out of work, it's a good thing we've got foodbanks for them to fall back on;

 

 

Your local MP, I believe - wonder if this'll make 'Spotlight'

 

And here's Amber Rudd stifling debate at another Hustings:

 

[ame]

[/ame]

 

They really don't like it when they have to face facts.

Edited June 5, 2017 by Mark J

[felixthelogchopper]

(1) No, round up the watch list and throw them in the Atlantic (mid.)

 

(2) Too bizarre for me

 

😁

 

But how do you get them on the watch list in the first place?

[dan494]

But how do you get them on the watch list in the first place?

However they're doing it now. Most these guys seem to be on one list or another

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Arbtalk mobile app

[Mark J]

Ok did that. All he said was he wanted a difficult conversation about cutting funding to Isis sympathetic states. I agree with this but doesn't respond to my point that he doesn't want them shot on sight in the act of terror and has also said there's nothing wrong with believing in radical Islam, or fighting for Isis and coming back to Britain?

He's that going to deal with anything? The attack Saturday cost £80 to rent a van and a pack or knives from Costco for a fiver?

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Arbtalk mobile app

 

You must have missed the bit where he said they would use "Whatever means necessary to combat the terror threat." It would, surely, be a bit daft to lay your cards on the table?

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

You admit that copper's right in what he says then.

 

So, cut away then - what, in your opinion, is a 'safe' number of police, and should we then apply the same rationale to our armed forces? After all, we hardly ever need them, and as for Trident - well, same thinking applies, surely?

 

Still, at least if they're out of work, it's a good thing we've got foodbanks for them to fall back on;

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your local MP, I believe - wonder if this'll make 'Spotlight'

 

 

She is a dreadful indictment of the state of the Conservative party in SE Cornwall and, just like last time, although I dread the prospect of a Labour government, I will not vote Tory because to do so would be to endorse this MP.

 

I know from personal experience, she is thick as a whale omelette, inept, inarticulate, self important and a generally unpleasant individual.

[Mark J]

She is a dreadful indictment of the state of the Conservative party in SE Cornwall and, just like last time, although I dread the prospect of a Labour government, I will not vote Tory because to do so would be to endorse this MP.

 

I know from personal experience, she is thick as a whale omelette, inept, inarticulate, self important and a generally unpleasant individual.

 

She sounds lovely. I'm glad you've changed your mind from voting tory because you couldn't face the other. I'd usually vote green party myself, but I think that labour is more environmentally minded than the foxy tories.