Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mark J said:

Yes Channel 4 is self funding, they buy/commission tv shows and films from independent media companies, if channel 4 was to go then these independent companies will lose a large chunk of their revenue, hence the anticipated loss of 2,400 jobs and 60 companies. 

Life would be pretty dull without art: no music, no films, no painting, no photography, no architecture, no design... 
Art enriches us all culturally, whether you like it or not. 

Let the private sector pay, they like flaunting their wealth, and what better way to allow them to do so.

Hey, even give them tax credits towards their donations.

Gubbermint is a fornicating wasteful shambles in this respect, especially with the subs to the Ophra!

To benefit their muckers, an Labour are ever bit as bad.

Edited by difflock
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

31 minutes ago, difflock said:

Let the private sector pay, they like flaunting their wealth, and what better way to allow them to do so.

Hey, even give them tax credits towards their donations.

Gubbermint is a ****************ing wasteful shambles in this respect, especially with the subs to the Ophra!

To benefit their muckers, an Labour are ever bit as bad.

The point is that Channel 4 generate enough money to pay for these things.

In terms of government funding and support initiatives, do you think they stop funding sports too?

 

Edited by Mark J
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mark J said:

The point is that Channel 4 generate enough money to pay for these things.

In terms of government funding and support initiatives, do you think they stop funding sports too?

 

Yes, absolutely.

Why fund "sports"?

Like I need a smallbore rifle range, but the Government will not fund it nor subsidize my shooting.

So why does football be so heavily subsidized ( you ANY idea what it takes to provide and maintain a Council pitch and changing rooms?) , especially when there are multi millionaire football clubs and multimillionaire  football players that should well be able to fund their "beloved" game?

Hmmmm,

I just remembered the Soviets were big into their state sponsered football clubs, something to do with distracting the proletariat from their woeful plight I suppose.

Edited by difflock
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, difflock said:

Yes, absolutely.

Why fund "sports"?

Like I need a smallbore rifle range, but the Government will not fund it nor subsidize my shooting.

So why does football be so heavily subsidized ( you ANY idea what it takes to provide and maintain a Council pitch and changing rooms?) , especially when there are multi millionaire football clubs and multimillionaire  football players that should well be able to fund their "beloved" game?

Fair enough.

Do you think that we should sell channel 4?
 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Why is the government intent on ruining our world-leading TV industry, asks Royal Television Society vice-president...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

78,000 Non Doms......I wonder how many are supporters/sponsors of other parties, but then again, that isn't newsworthy as knocking someone who, in their mind, is trying hard in their job to do well for the country.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, difflock said:

Yes, absolutely.

Why fund "sports"?

Like I need a smallbore rifle range, but the Government will not fund it nor subsidize my shooting.

So why does football be so heavily subsidized ( you ANY idea what it takes to provide and maintain a Council pitch and changing rooms?) , especially when there are multi millionaire football clubs and multimillionaire  football players that should well be able to fund their "beloved" game?

Hmmmm,

I just remembered the Soviets were big into their state sponsered football clubs, something to do with distracting the proletariat from their woeful plight I suppose.

I thought sports were funded  to encourage participation and in turn improving our health.

 

As a nation we are in pretty poor shape already without making sport out of reach of many due to cost.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Woodworks said:

I thought sports were funded  to encourage participation and in turn improving our health.

 

As a nation we are in pretty poor shape already without making sport out of reach of many due to cost.

Well said.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.