Making the news today....

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

[forestboy1978]

https://news.sky.com/video/share-11722583?fbclid=IwAR2rk02HkTi6_GXIaamaN7qulMheloMKR-Bm6L0R5mFv39hdqCJfPkOAWjI

[difflock]

And there my Mrs. thinks God created Men for Woman's pleasure(ing)  .  .  .

[felixthelogchopper]

Not dissimilar attitudes to the abortion debate in the USA at the moment.

[forestboy1978]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4184966/Child-sex-gang-members-shout-Allahu-Akbar-court.html?fbclid=IwAR17VhyEGAzynmGZhYwsTftZY1T8wfYCAtmo-wole4pqoIZYBDBUV7VWqZc#comments

 

Once again not MSM TV coverage of these disgusting animals. 

 

10 to 20 years sentencing per man = 3-7 years and out for good behaviour if first offence. Absolutely shocking. I'd see them burned alive for drugging and raping children. 

 

And they has SUPPORTERS in the dock....

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

17 minutes ago, forestboy1978 said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4184966/Child-sex-gang-members-shout-Allahu-Akbar-court.html?fbclid=IwAR17VhyEGAzynmGZhYwsTftZY1T8wfYCAtmo-wole4pqoIZYBDBUV7VWqZc#comments

 

Once again not MSM TV coverage of these disgusting animals. 

 

10 to 20 years sentencing per man = 3-7 years and out for good behaviour if first offence. Absolutely shocking. I'd see them burned alive for drugging and raping children. 

 

And they has SUPPORTERS in the dock....

And those that claim to be so offended by even the mention, albeit in very bad taste and in notably poor judgement, of rape, simultaneously, vehemently condemn the 1 individual that has done more than any other to highlight and expose (in the absence of due diligence by authority and under reporting by many media streams - doubtless due to the very same misguided fear of causing offence) such PREMEDITATED, MASS, ORGANISED, SYSTEMIC, CULTURAL abuse of CHILDREN.  

 

The hypocrisy is frankly beyond reason. 

[forestboy1978]

4 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

And those that claim to be so offended by even the mention, albeit in very bad taste and in notably poor judgement, of rape, simultaneously, vehemently condemn the 1 individual that has done more than any other to highlight and expose (in the absence of due diligence by authority and under reporting by many media streams - doubtless due to the very same misguided fear of causing offence) such PREMEDITATED, MASS, ORGANISED, SYSTEMIC, CULTURAL abuse of CHILDREN.  

 

The hypocrisy is frankly beyond reason. 

Beyond reason and comprehension! It's staggering. 

[forestboy1978]

There mere fact that anyone can support these vermin indicates phenomenal cultural issues beyond imagining. 

[felixthelogchopper]

5 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

And those that claim to be so offended by even the mention, albeit in very bad taste and in notably poor judgement, of rape, simultaneously, vehemently condemn the 1 individual that has done more than any other to highlight and expose (in the absence of due diligence by authority and under reporting by many media streams - doubtless due to the very same misguided fear of causing offence) such PREMEDITATED, MASS, ORGANISED, SYSTEMIC, CULTURAL abuse of CHILDREN.  

 

The hypocrisy is frankly beyond reason. 

Somebody needs a hug. Care to name names about who has got you all upset? Bear in mind though that just because somebody doesn't share your love for Yaxley Lennon as they are more concerned with the Rule of Law than with hero worshipping a self-publicist with a well publicised history of far right and criminal activity, it would be very foolish to suggest that this means they are in any way supportive of sexual exploitation of any kind, particularly when they have previosly clearly stated their position on the subject. By the way, here's a little light reading for anybody who might have missed this in the news recently.

 

https://www.ft.com/content/7b0af7dc-765d-11e9-bbad-7c18c0ea0201

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/14/tommy-robinson-will-face-fresh-contempt-charges-judges-rule/

https://pressgazette.co.uk/tommy-robinson-to-face-fresh-contempt-of-court-proceedings-high-court-rules/

https://news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-to-face-retrial-over-contempt-of-court-charge-11719979

Edited May 25, 2019 by felixthelogchopper

[forestboy1978]

37 minutes ago, felixthelogchopper said:

Somebody needs a hug. Care to name names about who has got you all upset? Bear in mind though that just because somebody doesn't share your love for Yaxley Lennon as they are more concerned with the Rule of Law than with hero worshipping a self-publicist with a well publicised history of far right and criminal activity, it would be very foolish to suggest that this means they are in any way supportive of sexual exploitation of any kind, particularly when they have previosly clearly stated their position on the subject. By the way, here's a little light reading for anybody who might have missed this in the news recently.

 

https://www.ft.com/content/7b0af7dc-765d-11e9-bbad-7c18c0ea0201

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/14/tommy-robinson-will-face-fresh-contempt-charges-judges-rule/

https://pressgazette.co.uk/tommy-robinson-to-face-fresh-contempt-of-court-proceedings-high-court-rules/

https://news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-to-face-retrial-over-contempt-of-court-charge-11719979

Screw the rule of law. When the rule of law works in favour of "some" perverts and not others, which it does not in most kiddy fiddler cases, then the rule of law SHOULD be broken. 

 

Everything  you quoted above is mainstream media which is practically automatic qualification for total bullshit.