Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Yeah, back at you, why do you keep pointing out only the wronguns who are black? I didn't see you being righteous over the recent, racially motivated rape of a Sikh woman.

You will find I commented on that and hopefully they are caught and get punished. 

  • Like 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
54 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

 

I remember the Southport attacks well, some close friends who were affected from Southport. I took an interest. 

 

JohnsonD did indeed jump on the bandwagon accusing Rudakubana of acting in the name of a religion and for parroting the news stories sent out (by Farage?) that he was a recent immigrant.

 

The posts he made were purely for political and racist point scoring.

I tell you what SP go back and check, I just have as it happens seeing as you are “ as usual “ the second one to make remarks about that incident tonight , there’s one person here parroting. 
Let me know what you find ?? 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You will find I commented on that and hopefully they are caught and get punished. 

 

Are you sure? Too much scuba gas frying your memory I fear.

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

Are you sure? Too much scuba gas frying your memory I fear.

“ Scuba Gas” 😞retard. 
Referance L103/104 ACOPS 

They are government publications so you should be ok to get them in the office tomorrow. I’m trying to educate you on an issue you are clueless about. You should be thankful. 
Make some time to read back mind. 

👍👍

Regarding you comment above unlike yourself I think “ all “ rapists should be treat the same, that absolutely goes without saying . I’ve no time for racial sensitivities shielding certain groups. Think I’ve said that enough times even for you to get it. 

Edited by Johnsond
  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, AHPP said:

 

I've been puzzling over your first post all day. It was somewhere between trying to have an argument where there wasn't one and, "He can't have read it right."

 

But whatever. Moving on. An increase from 0.009% to 0.011% doesn't matter. 100% of people who want to carry, should be able to. And it really is as simple as let females carry guns in order to keep them safe. If you disagree, I'd put you to sitting down with distraught rape victims and comforting them with the silver lining that their rapes were at least lesser (positivistic) crimes than the one of carrying a piece of iron that only harms criminals. Until you changed your mind or starved to death, whichever comes first.

 

It is utterly indefensible to deny the weaker sex the means to go about life freely.

 

Alex

 

I think that allowing woman to go around armed,will result in woman being raped at gunpoint,their weapons falling into criminal hands and the UK becoming more lawless.

 

Its not South Africa.

 

The law would have to be rewritten ,you know much more about this than me. Currently all Sec5 has to be approved by the home secretary and for that law to be only applicable to females wouldn't fly.

 

You can dream all you want about it,but its simply all that it will ever be.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Johnsond said:

I know it’s hard defending the indefensible all the time especially when it’s so easy to put up “ facts and statistics “ to counter your shite, that and the propensity for certain illegal immigrant groups to commit a disproportionate amount of sexual offences but really Mark you have to try a bit harder than that. 

but they werent illegal, so youre wrong.

and using makey-uppy words like leftard makes you more of a bellend than the racism 

Posted
9 hours ago, Johnsond said:

terror watchlist

Not exactly Mr Thicky, the prevent programme is there to, and please try to get this, PREVENT people becoming terrorists.

Go look it up and take a screenshot.

Posted (edited)

One from last night and a bit further back is Bella Culley who was pregnant and caught with hash and marijuana in her case entering Georgia. 

As part of the plea her parents raised £130+K and she gets out instead of doing the 2 years the plea would have got her?

 

What kind of justice system is that?

Edited by BillQ
Spelling

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.