Making the news today....

[Johnsond]

4 minutes ago, Mesterh said:

You are just focusing on one thing and one thing only. There are probably multiple reasons that would have prevented him from getting injured but youre just focusing on the fact that he was praying is why he was injured.

Am I wrong?

 

 

You didn’t answer the question Mesterh did you ?? 
What single thing would have prevented him being injured. 
 

[tree-fancier123]

if he was undoing a fastener underneath, the car started to drop on him and Superman flew in and lifted the car back up

[Steven P]

Reading this, I am making an assumption - partly based on your bias against anyone whose religion is not of your approval, JohnsonD - that you are inferring that the man was crushed because he was praying and a Muslim?

 

This must go down as one of the most ludicrous things you have ever typed on this forum. If I was you I'd be checking what gas is in those Scuba tanks you sniff all day long.

 

 

Now that the HSE are involved - their primary work is accidents in the work place - the mans place of work. He could equally have been under the car doing an oil change, as anything else. Now your obsession tonight is a single point of failure has caused this, and that single point of failure is that single thing that could have been done to prevent an accident.

 

Truth is, we don't know, which is why the HSE are investigating. I am surprised that you are unaware what the HSE do in investigations. When their investigation is completed we will know.

 

I will bet you, lets say, your vanity van that the cause of the accident is not 'Act of a god' (you can pick the god too if you want).

 

It will be something such as poor maintenance, overriding a safety mechanism, operator error. In fact if you have ever read any reports by the HSE, fatal accidents usualy stem from humans doing something they shouldn't or not maintaining something they should. I've never seen one report saying 'act of god'.

 

 

If you want to continue to spou your racism, this isn't the forum for it.

[Mesterh]

19 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You didn’t answer the question Mesterh did you ?? 
What single thing would have prevented him being injured. 
 

THE. CAR. NOT. FALLING. ON. HIM.

 

Everyone else can understand that is the reason why he was injured. 

 

It doesn't matter if he was praying to jesus christ , having tea with his mother or standing under that car for 4 hours while swapping out a gearbox. The car falling on him caused the injuries and the reason why it fell is probably the reason why the firm was fined.

 

Why do you think one single thing is the answer?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Oldfeller]

Having used a two post hoist more times than I can remember, it is apparent the vehicle was not on the pads as it should have been, ie; balanced correctly, the nationality, religion, or the color of his feckin' overalls has no bearing on the outcome, journalists need sensationalism to sell the product, HSE don't care about whether he's black,white, muslim, or feckin' martian, but they will find who is at fault,after an investigation, and take appropriate action.

this thread is titled "making the news today"

this made the news, with a headline designed to attract attention,. but as always the poster has been accused of racism, by the usual group of people, and a load of the usual inconsequential nonsense spouted.

If a car fell on Donald Trump  no doubt those same accusers would be posting something very different.

isn't there an old saying,,, "don't shoot the messenger"

fact; there are 1.644 billion cars in the world, not one of the feckers fell on kier starmer.  now that would be a sensational headline to sell copy.

 

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mesterh said:

Why do you think one single thing is the answer

He was under the car on his knees not paying any attention whatsoever to his surroundings, if he had not been then he’d not have ended up with a car on top of him 🤷‍♂️

Edited June 27 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

3 hours ago, Steven P said:

Reading this, I am making an assumption - partly based on your bias against anyone whose religion is not of your approval, JohnsonD - that you are inferring that the man was crushed because he was praying and a Muslim?

 

This must go down as one of the most ludicrous things you have ever typed on this forum. If I was you I'd be checking what gas is in those Scuba tanks you sniff all day long.

 

 

Now that the HSE are involved - their primary work is accidents in the work place - the mans place of work. He could equally have been under the car doing an oil change, as anything else. Now your obsession tonight is a single point of failure has caused this, and that single point of failure is that single thing that could have been done to prevent an accident.

 

Truth is, we don't know, which is why the HSE are investigating. I am surprised that you are unaware what the HSE do in investigations. When their investigation is completed we will know.

 

I will bet you, lets say, your vanity van that the cause of the accident is not 'Act of a god' (you can pick the god too if you want).

 

It will be something such as poor maintenance, overriding a safety mechanism, operator error. In fact if you have ever read any reports by the HSE, fatal accidents usualy stem from humans doing something they shouldn't or not maintaining something they should. I've never seen one report saying 'act of god'.

 

 

If you want to continue to spou your racism, this isn't the forum for it.

😂😂😂🤷‍♂️Right blagger seeing as you are on it tonight how’s about you sort out those loose ends lad. 
As for the fool under the car, there’s a time and place for everything in life that was evidently not neither  in his case. 
Another string to your bow SP eh HSE expert too, what are you ?? NEBOSH/IOSH ( both good courses by the way, mind you probably not much use in an office) qualified, just for some context before you make yet more BS assumptions. You did say one thing that’s correct for a change and that’s the fact the accident was in a “ place of work” not prayer. Are you suffering from some form of learning disability 🤷‍♂️I’ve said to others  on here that Scuba is banned for commercial use under the HSE ACOPS L103/104 do you struggle to comprehend that. By the way it’s Cylinder not Tank. Try and remember that. 

Edited June 28 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

Reading this, I am making an assumption - partly based on your bias against anyone whose religion is not of your approval, JohnsonD - that you are inferring that the man was crushed because he was praying and a Muslim?

 

You and these assumptions lad, the amount of times you have made a total tit of yourself I’d have thought you might have learned your lesson. 
He was crushed because he was under a car praying, in a workplace not paying attention to his surroundings, he’s a bloody fool quite frankly, it’s you not I that mentioned your second favourite word  “ Muslim” . 
I wonder if it had been a daft bugger with a bible sat there and I’d posted exactly the same comment up I’d have got the same libtard outcry 🤔not a bloody chance. 
Anyway other thread loose ends etc etc any chance 🤷‍♂️

[Steven P]

If praying had been the single cause to the accident then the HSE wouldn't have prosecuted the garage. It would have been noted as an act of a god. That didn't happen. Accident happened as I noted above by human error. The lift could as easily collapsed while the man was under the car doing any other task. Only an idiot would think otherwise really, acts of god don't happen.

 

 

The fact that the ONLY HSE prosecution you have mentioned on this forum involves a Muslim (who has suffered massive injuries by the way) is down to a single fact: JohnsonD is deeply racist and thinks that gloating on this forum is going to win favour with all and everyone.

 

Note here: The man was seriously injured in a work place accident. JohnsonD didn't bring this to our attention to make all our garage work safer, he brought it to our attention to highlight it was a Muslim who was injured.

 

 

 

 

 

I write this having looked at the HSE fatal accidents, if you want to teach us all a lesson, make our work with trees safer have a look through that - there is a listing - 2024 to 2025, several cases of arborists, farmers, forestry workers being killed in work. Why didn't you highlight any of them - relative to the forum, a better learning opportunity and a reminder to us all to be safe. Oh, yes, I know, none of the ones listed had 'foreign' names.....

[Johnsond]

28 minutes ago, Steven P said:

you want to teach us all a lesson, make our work with trees safer

Ok SP now we are getting somewhere. 
please enlighten us all about your work with trees, a few pics maybe of your work or kit maybe 🤷‍♂️you do a bit of milling  or firewood SP ?? Maybe a bit of felling or climbing ?? Come on lad this could be a first on here for you. 
I can’t offer any advice to you regards office work blagger apart from I hear paper cuts can be a bit nippy eh.