Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Weight kg per M-cube of solid wood?


Bob_z_l
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

there will always be differences and to be honest i'm only quoting what's in the books rather than my own measurements.

 

 

 

 

 

where abouts in the tree did they come from? remember wood from the top can weigh alot less than the wood at the base.

 

 

True dat.

Same species exhibit different densities throughout the tree, and dependent on growing conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True dat.

Same species exhibit different densities throughout the tree, and dependent on growing conditions.

 

i only realised this a few years ago when i bought a beautiful bit of iroko off ebay and was pleased with the postage considering it was 18" square and 2" thick.

 

when i received it i thought i'd been had as it was nearly half the weight of normal iroko but was definitely iroko.

 

a few days later i was talking to the sales guy at whitmores timber and he pointed out to me that you don't have heavy timber at the top of the tree.

 

i had a lightbulb moment (and said to myself "doh") realising this would be true of all species that get to any appreciable height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there will always be differences and to be honest i'm only quoting what's in the books rather than my own measurements.

 

 

where abouts in the tree did they come from? remember wood from the top can weigh alot less than the wood at the base.

 

Every dumbo knows that! I've done my back in several times lifting the stumps.

Doesn't matter how low I cut them, they always seem to be soddin' heavy :confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 more samples of sweet chestnut. One from latest load and probably recently cut. The second has been here years and think it was stacked in the woods for some time before that. Both pieces were cut from the middle of a length but the old piece was a larger section.

DSC04245.jpg.6036778f01d590a50915ebbc7a319443.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.