Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
  Hodge said:
Thinking about it if they don't put a TPO on the tree then they are consenting to you doing the work...

 

 

I thought there was a 4 week time scale to decide to TPO the tree, if you work on trees in a CA in that time scale with out permission unless it's dead ,dangerous or dying you get prosecuted.

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  MattyF said:
I thought there was a 4 week time scale to decide to TPO the tree, if you work on trees in a CA in that time scale with out permission unless it's dead ,dangerous or dying you get prosecuted.

 

 

6 weeks round here I think. And yes that's the way I understand it too.

Posted
  MattyF said:
I thought there was a 4 week time scale to decide to TPO the tree, if you work on trees in a CA in that time scale with out permission unless it's dead ,dangerous or dying you get prosecuted.

 

Four weeks starting from when Matty?

Posted

Hodge is right it's 6 weeks , have not done one for a year but I've got a whole folder of hundreds I've had to do!

6 weeks from when they make the application for the works in the CA

Posted
  Hodge said:
From when the application is logged,

 

Cheers Hodge,

 

So in theory the Parish Council, assuming they own the tree, need to apply for permission to fell it because its in a CA? Or the arborist doing the work for them would lodge the application?

 

Please excuse my ignorance, as I've said before I'm not in the industry, sorry.

Posted

Your pretty much right exempt in a conservation area it's not an application it's a notice of intended works, the only way a TO can stop said notification is to put a TPO on said tree, if he doesn't thinks it's worth a tpo the owners can do as they please.

Posted
  Ian C said:
Your pretty much right exempt in a conservation area it's not an application it's a notice of intended works, the only way a TO can stop said notification is to put a TPO on said tree, if he doesn't thinks it's worth a tpo the owners can do as they please.

 

 

Yes but they still have to put in the notice. If the PC get the tree felled without putting a notice of intent up then they can be prosecuted can they not?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Read more  

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.