Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Trees for nptc training !!!


Johny Walker
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's nothing! A training provider near me takes on work (clearance, thinnings, pruning etc), they gets paid to train lads for their tickets, gets them to do the work for part of their training, then takes the chipper training lads to clear up! He gets paid by the client, the trainees, everyone!

 

Sounds like he's got it just right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's nothing! A training provider near me takes on work (clearance, thinnings, pruning etc), they gets paid to train lads for their tickets, gets them to do the work for part of their training, then takes the chipper training lads to clear up! He gets paid by the client, the trainees, everyone!

 

 

Good idea!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is often a shortage of trees for training/assessment, particularly wind blown. Good offer Johnny!

 

My view too, windblown has to be <12 month down, nudging some with a digger may produce results.

Last lot wanted a few trees per assessment and 3 different types of winthrown, snapped hanging, rootplate tipping forward and back.

 

Good job I did all mine in 1991 when there were plantations of softwood down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's nothing! A training provider near me takes on work (clearance, thinnings, pruning etc), they gets paid to train lads for their tickets, gets them to do the work for part of their training, then takes the chipper training lads to clear up! He gets paid by the client, the trainees, everyone!

 

If by charging the landowner less because the operators are all inexperienced and also then being able to use that to help reduce the costs of the training to make it more affordable for those wantng to undertake training then that's a great idea.

 

If the landowner are paying full whack for the work being done and the trainees paying full whack then it sits less well, maybe it's just me but it just feels wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by charging the landowner less because the operators are all inexperienced and also then being able to use that to help reduce the costs of the training to make it more affordable for those wantng to undertake training then that's a great idea.

 

If the landowner are paying full whack for the work being done and the trainees paying full whack then it sits less well, maybe it's just me but it just feels wrong.

 

Strictly speaking, the work force would be untrained so I would be concerned about insurance issues if nothing else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly added a bit like that before, not so much from the insurance side of things but more what sort of finish they may leave. I've been out on forestry sites where training providers had been beforehand and it wasn't good.

 

I know that may have just been isolated instances but it still happened - what the landowner was expecting and what was left were two totally different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly added a bit like that before, not so much from the insurance side of things but more what sort of finish they may leave. I've been out on forestry sites where training providers had been beforehand and it wasn't good.

 

I know that may have just been isolated instances but it still happened - what the landowner was expecting and what was left were two totally different things.

 

Exactly. Better off to do the way Johnny has and offer the work for training purposes. :thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a college in to fell some of my trees while I'm out getting paid to fell other people's. Initially had trouble with chaotic mess and random lengths as most o the instructors are from arb not forestry backgrounds and students going into the same so I had to explain the importance of uniform lengths and impenetrable dead hedges and now everything's good EXCEPT when independent assessors come in and ignore specifically marked trees for felling and take ones down that I want left and then leave random little heaps of crosscut logs everywhere. I know of at least 4 other sites where,sadly, the owners won't be having training providers back. I think they just need to see the jobs right through which gives students a better idea of the importance of tidy site tidy mind= happy woodland owner😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.