Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

AAAHHHROOOOOO! Dem Wolves!


Billhook
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Answer has been the same since I heard the plan 5 years ago, a big, fat no! As someone who keeps animals outdoors, it would mean I would have to buy a rifle, the danger, costs and implications would see them eradicated as soon as they were reintroduced!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answer has been the same since I heard the plan 5 years ago, a big, fat no! As someone who keeps animals outdoors, it would mean I would have to buy a rifle, the danger, costs and implications would see them eradicated as soon as they were reintroduced!

 

Why would you buy a rifle???? They would be a protected species.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you buy a rifle???? They would be a protected species.

 

 

Until someone got mauled!

As for reintroduction, were on a small, densely populated land mass. Wolves would soon be in our cities, we've already had problems with foxes and dogs, why the hell would we add wolves?!

 

For, anybody unfamiliar with the reintroduction policy, elk and bears are also on the list!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reintroduction would consider dense population areas. Surely reintroducing species into remote areas with continuous monitoring wouldn't result in the rather Daily Mail prophecy of Wolves stealing babies from peoples homes.

 

The " urban " fox does not discriminate , in fact there may be more townie foxes than country ones now . Might the wolf go the same way ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that could be an issue but I was always under the impression that any reintroduction program would primarily involve locations as remote as the the northern most parts of Scotland, perhaps areas of Dartmoor.

 

Again with careful control measures, electronic tagging of all animals, ongoing observation etc... I think small numbers may be reintroduced at if negative effects became apparent then they could be 'nipped in the bud' before they became a an environmental catastrophe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.