Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Dangerous Agricultural / Forestry Vehicles


TRADITIONAL LOGGERS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Because you and the vast majority of the population will starve.

 

The Common Agricultural Policy only came about in 1962. I never knew that people in Britain were starving before that date?

 

If Britain never starved in 1939-45 when the U boats were sinking shipping I honestly think we wouldn't starve if they got rid of the CAP....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The Common Agricultural Policy only came about in 1962. I never knew that people in Britain were starving before that date?

 

If Britain never starved in 1939-45 when the U boats were sinking shipping I honestly think we wouldn't starve if they got rid of the CAP....

 

People did'nt starve then due to rationing! Hedgerow and woodland were ripped up to increase the available productive land and people were encouraged to dig up their gardens and grow there own vegetables, the UK is currently only 60% self sufficent in food, meaning that if we had no imports the country would only have enough food for 219 days. The problem is that back during the second world war people still spent around 40% of their income on food whereas today it is something like 15% as they want it cheap as possible so they can spend thier money on other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People did'nt starve then due to rationing! Hedgerow and woodland were ripped up to increase the available productive land and people were encouraged to dig up their gardens and grow there own vegetables, the UK is currently only 60% self sufficent in food, meaning that if we had no imports the country would only have enough food for 219 days. The problem is that back during the second world war people still spent around 40% of their income on food whereas today it is something like 15% as they want it cheap as possible so they can spend thier money on other things.

 

All true- but I think the 60% figure could be hugely increased if a) people ate less meat (im not saying that in a hippy way, but its a fact) and b) if not so much was wasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All true- but I think the 60% figure could be hugely increased if a) people ate less meat (im not saying that in a hippy way, but its a fact) and b) if not so much was wasted.

 

I agree with you. I also think that if we reduced the amount of golf courses/ horses etc we could produce a lot more food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All true- but I think the 60% figure could be hugely increased if a) people ate less meat (im not saying that in a hippy way, but its a fact) and b) if not so much was wasted.

 

I can't agree with a), being a beef and sheep farmer :laugh1: but I do agree with b), sell by dates and use by dates and a lack of common sense and the blame culture all come together to cause the amount of waste, heard something earlier think it was something like 129 million tonnes of usable food wasted every year in UK, not to mention all the waste from all the plastic and polystyrene packaging on everything :sneaky2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. I also think that if we reduced the amount of golf courses/ horses etc we could produce a lot more food.

 

Yes and what with these housing estates popping up all over the place on prime agricultural land im sure we will become even more dependent on imported food. I love how this thread has totally derailed:laugh1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't agree with a), being a beef and sheep farmer :laugh1: but I do agree with b), sell by dates and use by dates and a lack of common sense and the blame culture all come together to cause the amount of waste, heard something earlier think it was something like 129 million tonnes of usable food wasted every year in UK, not to mention all the waste from all the plastic and polystyrene packaging on everything :sneaky2:

 

Id have though all the more reason to agree with me! surely if people ate less meat (it was more of a premium product as opposed to a nessecity) then more value would be placed on the animal and it would be a case of farming for quality as opposed to quantity?:thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather like this, would you prefer to do 6 jobs in a day and get £20 each for them or 3 jobs and get £40. Meat will never die out, but these super cheap deals in supermarkets '3 packets of meat for a £10' aren't really doing anyone favours. I think meat should almost be a luxury item really (within reason, im not saying food for the rich!) but if people ate less of the poor quality intensively farmed meat they could afford the decent stuff, just less often.

Just my thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.