Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

any loler inspectors done a zigzag yet


andymum
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I put a thread up the other week after talking to the petzl fella at the apf about this problem.

 

I have a feeling that they have again made a product not fit for purpose, as it seems not to be robust enough.

 

No way should you be filing down anything you climb on. Something is not right somewhere.

 

I just think that petzl have a huge problem, and although they say they are being honest ect, they can't afford to have this one recalled aswell!

 

On the note of the loler inspector, he won't want to put his name to any thing that might fail.

 

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put a thread up the other week after talking to the petzl fella at the apf about this problem.

 

I have a feeling that they have again made a product not fit for purpose, as it seems not to be robust enough.

 

No way should you be filing down anything you climb on. Something is not right somewhere.

 

I just think that petzl have a huge problem, and although they say they are being honest ect, they can't afford to have this one recalled aswell!

 

On the note of the loler inspector, he won't want to put his name to any thing that might fail.

 

Good luck!

 

Also if Petzel tell you to file/paper it down are you invalidating any warranty or is it ok coz they said do it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I've examined quite a few, not had any that weren't fit for purpose yet, without seeing yours i cant really comment.

 

Removing sharp burrs with stone, file or paper is standard practice and I do it all the time, often on very minor chips/ burrs on pulleys, karabiners etc just need a tickle to ensure they wont damage any cordage. That said i would not recommend anyone without the practical knowledge and experience takes a file to their kit unless under the supervision/ instruction of someone that does.

 

Generally speaking damage of more than 10% would generate a fail however it depends on the item, its design & the location of the damage, a certain size chip in one place on a karabiner will weaken it far more than one in another, an even smaller chip on a mechanical device my render it dangerous due to its ability to impair its function.

 

Have Lyon seen a picture of the device? If you send it to them I'm sure that they would gladly look over it for you free of charge. The best thing you can do after that would be to encourage your examiner to open a dialogue with Lyon, he/she might still refuse to pass the item fit for purpose in which case maybe Lyon can do that for you or alternatively you can find someone else to examine your kit that doesn't agree that this defect is significant.

 

Hope that helps, Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.