Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
thats my take, leaving epicormics and any sap risers that are within the line of the rounding over of the canopy.:thumbup1:

 

Thanks for all your replies :thumbup:

 

I too think a more drastic pollard would be best to reduce the size of the tree once its rebounded with fresh regrowth. I like Tony's idea (to quote one, i know someone else said similar) of bringing back down to growth points and restructuring the framework from there to form a better scaffold.

 

Will take the ideas back to the client and see how we get on. Will post pics up when we do the job.

 

Thanks folks

James :thumbup1:

Posted
I agree, reduce it into the first regrowth and selective thinning of mirroring shoots. You could make a new frame for the crown like that. Instead of pollarding it and it regrowing just as thick as is now in a couple of years. The poor tree has had a hard life, by doing this method you keep more stored energy, keep some ablity to photosynthesize and done right should give it a more natural appearence.

 

Hear hear

 

Sent from my "smartphone" so my spelling will be awful

Posted

do be aware are you in a ash die back area all that fresh growth ! did 2 hectare of mostly ash coppice last winter 99.9% has ash die back looking around at the standards most of them have epicormic growth in the tops of the crown's it's rife around these parts once you look for it

Posted
do be aware are you in a ash die back area all that fresh growth ! did 2 hectare of mostly ash coppice last winter 99.9% has ash die back looking around at the standards most of them have epicormic growth in the tops of the crown's it's rife around these parts once you look for it

 

Yes, I am aware of the Chalara in the area and will be checking it properly before commencing to ensure we adhere to current guidelines. :thumbup1:

 

As for the prospective regrowth, well that's going to have to risk it, or else we would be ultimately felling trees for the sake of it before its infected, just in case the regrowth gets infected. :confused1:

Posted

I have an ash to fell in Teston in Kent, it's not in an infected area but part of the terms & conditions is to leave it on-site to be buried by the contractors we're working for.

Posted
I have an ash to fell in Teston in Kent, it's not in an infected area but part of the terms & conditions is to leave it on-site to be buried by the contractors we're working for.

 

I dont agree with these sorts of policy, we have it here now, and if they are correct in stating it got here by wind (doubtfull) then it is long past control via cleanliness.

 

The waste of resources (the firewood) is going to be immense and criminal, maybe burn/bury the brush but the timber could easily be dry stored.

 

but thats JUST an opinion.

Posted
I dont agree with these sorts of policy, we have it here now, and if they are correct in stating it got here by wind (doubtfull) then it is long past control via cleanliness.

 

The waste of resources (the firewood) is going to be immense and criminal, maybe burn/bury the brush but the timber could easily be dry stored.

 

but thats JUST an opinion.

 

What makes you think chalera hasn't arrived naturally Tony? Just interested in your opinion?

 

I definitely agree that's control measures are going to be impossible long term, due to it's airbourne capacity.

Posted

In truth you could say now that control measures are pointless. Just let the thing get on with it and we'll see what comes out the other end.

Remember the hurricane in 87 and all the mechanical clearance to 'tidy' things up. It's just not natural.

Posted
I have an ash to fell in Teston in Kent, it's not in an infected area but part of the terms & conditions is to leave it on-site to be buried by the contractors we're working for.

 

Sounds like a knee jerk reaction by the contractors to prevent future recourse back to them, and I agree with Tony that its a massive waste of resources.

 

I too somewhat suspect that Chalara came into this country via an airbourne vector some years ago, and if it didnt and even there was no human interaction / importation of diseased timber or plant matter, that it would have got here eventually anyway! :confused1:

 

My thoughts are currently the outbreak will snowball next year and there will be no stopping the spread of it. :sneaky2:

 

I still find its amazing that there is a percentage of the population which survives / immune to it. Its like nature always has a plan and this is simply another part of it :blushing:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.