Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
read it, then decide if use at all is acceptable

 

No it's not acceptable not only for the fact it affects warter and soil but also because of something closer to home very upsetting .

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

What worries me about that report is that it includes loads of references, and every single one of them is to another article on their own web site. Looking at the reports referred to, many of the references in those are again to their own web site, and so on.

 

My attitude is that it's a herbicide - you're not supposed to drink the stuff, and I wouldn't eat anything recently sprayed with it. Read the label for more safety instructions.

Posted
Does anyone know any Eco ways of poisoning stumps as we use roundup at the moment and as tony has brought this to light I will not be using again . Cheers for the info tony.

 

we use timbrel on stumps away from watercoarses... awsome stuff but i recon thats on its way out too

Posted
What worries me about that report is that it includes loads of references, and every single one of them is to another article on their own web site. Looking at the reports referred to, many of the references in those are again to their own web site, and so on.

 

Not to mention the fact that if you want to see the full references - you need to pay £3.50. Not very transparent - and almost guarantees a self selected and supportive audience...

Posted
Not to mention the fact that if you want to see the full references - you need to pay £3.50. Not very transparent - and almost guarantees a self selected and supportive audience...

 

 

No probably just a simple case of having to find some way of paying for its service. bit like what Andy was saying about the FC:001_rolleyes:

Posted

Broadly speaking, I'm against the use of herbicides. I accept some uses are close to unavoidable though.

 

However, that article was seriously flawed. Where was the dosage information? It mentioned figures like 500mg/l - what does that mean? Blood concentration? A one-off dose? A daily does? An hourly dose?

 

Bad science...

Posted
Broadly speaking, I'm against the use of herbicides. I accept some uses are close to unavoidable though.

 

However, that article was seriously flawed. Where was the dosage information? It mentioned figures like 500mg/l - what does that mean? Blood concentration? A one-off dose? A daily does? An hourly dose?

 

Bad science...

 

How to lie with statistics springs to mind

Posted

Allright guys did they mention the carrier agent used in glyphosate. my understanding of glyphosate is that normally the carring agent is the nasty ingrediant that cause alot of the problems to humans.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.