Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

speach less!


Craig Johnson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Agree with comments that a lower pollard may of been better but for them all to be the same height they couldnt of done - some would of just been stems and looked even worse (I appreciate they dont all have to be the same height but then every tom dick and harry would say that the row of trees looked odd :001_rolleyes:)

 

Firstly - why do them now - they looked manageable to start with

 

Secondly - a crown reduction would of made them look 20 times better.

 

Thirdly - someones going to be up them every few years taking the epicormic off, making them look just as bad every time.

 

Not terrible work on the tree's but a very bad spec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I will bring the 200 next time I go out on the razz on Cheltenham then.

 

Last time, we free climbed every tree on Pittville lawn and nearly got arrested

 

Hey dean, nearly arrested for free climbing a tree????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno what you're all upset about - in these times of economic hardship, we can't have local councils paying people to sweep up leaves. And just look at that "before" picture - far too many leaves on the pavement. Someone might trip over one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are street trees, limes that have been put there in the anticipation of a regular hiding, high pollard, low pollard call it what you like they needed trimming, pruning or reducing, because they were getting too big for their environment. "Light formative prune" really won't cut it on these, plus it is as easy to do this as mucking around taking off a few feet with a silky, they look a bit rubbish now but by the end of summer they will have thrown out stacks of growth. "oh but it will have to been done again in a few years!" well yeah so what? that's part of our our job

Imho many people are blind to the fact that treating limes, willows, poplars etc in the same way as walnuts, oaks, and beech is like a Vet treating dogs and cows the same. Oaks and Poplars for example are very different, to reduce them both to a similar spec is daft.

Don't want a war, just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.