Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Dual Decay


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

A client's tree Dave...........

 

.........Would like to reduce and retain if possible.

 

 

 

Surprising the white rot of the resinaceum didn't show much of a presence with the resistograph. Perhaps as its fruiting from a sinus its not yet into the sapwood regions?

 

Tree 'looks' vital enough to take a relatively hard reduction though ?

 

Multiple readings taken?

 

Any other fruiting on the side out of view?

 

 

Clients give any indication of how long the resinaceum has been fruiting?

 

Lots of questions :001_rolleyes: interesting situation :biggrin:

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I've been mulling on this one today after looking closely at the resistograph readings. I took three readings - all at about 20cm above ground level: one between the Gano and the 4 Inonotus brackets, one between the main Inonotus brackets and another a third of the way round the stem, and a final reading from the opposite side of the first.

 

The first two readings were pretty flat - not the steady incline you'd expect to see in sound wood. Looking closely at the trace, there is also less 'flicker' in the reading than normal - the minor variation in resistance that you see as the bit passes through annual rings.

 

The third reading was much better as expected being farthest away from the brackets.

 

Although I think the tree could take a reduction to reduce the windsail I believe this would only be a short term measure - and one which would need repeating which will inevitably reduce the amenity of the tree. I guess I'm also aware of the client's purse strings...

 

The tree is on a corner of a road junction as well as within 10 metres of the flats and their parking spaces. Without further investigation of the roots I'm not confident enough to retain this one so reluctantly I've recommended removal. No doubt others will disagree!

IMG_2490.jpg.bdea90a5ef7d6cd23fc825ff16184859.jpg

IMG_2499.jpg.58a32d1d2c8296c71c890721d0c58696.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The removal looks a fair call Paul, certainly with regards to the ongoing monitoring and the potential for numerous return works.

 

Out of an interest of looking at this tree in its setting,

 

does it appear to be a lone oak or from a large (but seperatated) population?

 

What's the story/history of the estate developement?

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.