Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
As you can see I'm not the only one who thinks Laylandi is perfectly good fire wood.

 

Sure its not Beech or Ash, but it burns well and produces good heat, bon-firing it seems very wasteful to me.

 

Yes it is wast full but I do not have the time space or market for it plus I put the better tree surgery waste in a pile for friends and family.

 

Ps I never disagreed about it burning just about the quality.

 

I am off to the pub now for my 2 pints of black stuff.

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
Stainless has a high ferrous content - it's the alloying with chromium and vanadium that gives it the corrosion resistance. There are different grades - and I always advise people to pick the higher-grade of the two usually on offer for flues and components.

 

But it's only corrosion resistance. Not immunity in the lower grades. Hence the issues folks are having.

 

Surely non magnetic stainless as no ferrous content . If a magnet wont stick there is no iron ?

Posted

Your a 100per cent right Skyhuck it's like we were saying inyour yard a few months back it's not the firewood that's the problem it's the water in it that's the burning problem

Posted
Surely non magnetic stainless as no ferrous content . If a magnet wont stick there is no iron ?

 

I'm afraid that doesn't follow. Some stainless steels are indeed magnetic, but austenitic ones (which is most of them, by volume) are not. But they're still largely made of iron.

Posted
Phone started to ring again this morning, made an executive decision to start logs on 6th... its still Christmas in my house!

 

HI STEPH here to mate phone ring again here to :thumbup1:thanks jon :thumbup:

Posted
I'm afraid that doesn't follow. Some stainless steels are indeed magnetic, but austenitic ones (which is most of them, by volume) are not. But they're still largely made of iron.

 

So just to be clear EN58J non magnetic stainless steel still contains iron ?

Posted
So just to be clear EN58J non magnetic stainless steel still contains iron ?

 

Correct. EN58J - more often known in wood-burning circles as '316' - is comprised of carbon, manganese, chromium, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur and approximately two thirds of good old iron. No zinc, aluminium or copper. Search online for it and you'll get the exact percentages by weight.

Posted (edited)
The clue is in the name "stainless steel"

 

Another clue is in the stainless not stainproof steel :biggrin: I used to work at a foundry where it was made years ago before British Steel bought it and shut it down. 904 is a better quality liner material.

Edited by peatff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.