Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Is this tree safe?


Perkins
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are no signs of disease but clearly the tree has a major defect in the shape of the two large splits in the bark at the base, one of which runs the full height of the tree. The bleached hearwood is peppered with woodworm.

 

Dying/dangerous?

 

Thoughts please.

IMGP0200b.jpg

IMGP0205b.jpg

IMGP0201b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks like an old lightening strike. If it's got good leaf cover and is fairly sheltered it should stay up. Often quite alarming surface defects only go in an inch or so and the structural timber is fine. Have a look to see if the decay goes in a long way at any point. Even then it doesn't always mean the tree will fail soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its an old lightening wound, check out wall 4 of CODIT making an appearance just under the bark, difficult to access the depth of the decay from sight alone - reduce to 15 ft monolith (monitor annually) and leave to re-sprout, that trees got at least another 200 years left in it.

 

The discolouration of the wood at the base of the tree is a concern -

59765a89dd492_redarrow.jpg.ecca66b2daafd728bb220ae0bbcbaf7b.jpg

Edited by scotspine1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its an old lightening wound, check out wall 4 of CODIT making an appearance just under the bark, difficult to access the depth of the decay from sight alone - reduce to 15 ft monolith (monitor annually) and leave to re-sprout, that trees got at least another 200 years left in it.

 

The discolouration of the wood at the base of the tree is a concern -

 

Tosh, sorry, the existing sapwood bands are not enough to generate a new skin before decay has it away.

 

Lightning strikes on small diameter trees like this especialy diffuse porus ones will cause them to rot off like a fence post, that is common and basic.

 

Sycamore is a poor manager of decay, and this one is going to become very well decayed. The pale surface colouration hides a damp layer beneath, where decay agents will have a mad hatters tea party in the continuosly damp zone caused by the wicking effect of dysfunctional wood in contact with the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sycamore is a poor manager of decay, and this one is going to become very well decayed. The pale surface colouration hides a damp layer beneath, where decay agents will have a mad hatters tea party in the continuosly damp zone caused by the wicking effect of dysfunctional wood in contact with the ground.

 

 

 

I thought it was an aesculus:blushing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.