Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Hamas big reduction/pruning thread!


Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

So we finally get to a tree for a second time in thread! original photos in post 10 of this thread, tree actually reduced 11th July 2008, but posted in this thread 2009. Cant believe its been going that long now!

 

so first up the original post images before and after, and then todays job on the same tree, so just over 4 years to the repeat prune.

 

Last time foliage % was discussed by some, having had a good look this time while on site I reckon 60-70% of the foliage is removed this time, slightly more than last time as ive dropped a few crotches to thin out the heavy wood rather than just regrowth this time.

 

tree in Very good health:biggrin:

 

5976626337417_hornbeamreduction0001.jpg.2430b4392cbaf2d99104beb484bf65bc.jpg

 

59766263396fc_hornbeamreduction0002.jpg.5fae9d24275e89572190a031aa3ccc3c.jpg

 

597662633b5a7_hornbeamreduction016.jpg.4724c8a2de526bab19f2899f1fd2f803.jpg

 

597662633d1fc_hornbeamreduction022.jpg.1e3f27513fcd523e898ed19b6f9a98af.jpg

 

597662633ed95_hornbeamreduction028.jpg.b500b46be555c29abed8137986941037.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
So we finally get to a tree for a second time in thread! original photos in post 10 of this thread, tree actually reduced 11th July 2008, but posted in this thread 2009. Cant believe its been going that long now!

 

so first up the original post images before and after, and then todays job on the same tree, so just over 4 years to the repeat prune.

 

Last time foliage % was discussed by some, having had a good look this time while on site I reckon 60-70% of the foliage is removed this time, slightly more than last time as ive dropped a few crotches to thin out the heavy wood rather than just regrowth this time.

 

tree in Very good health:biggrin:

 

[ATTACH]105743[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]105744[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]105745[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]105746[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]105747[/ATTACH]

 

That looks nice? Did the tree have a problem to warrant such a heavy reduction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
That looks nice? Did the tree have a problem to warrant such a heavy reduction?

 

I wont bother to make an assumption on the placement of the question mark, but in answer to the last half of the inquiry, no this was purely mangment, cyclical containment.

 

what some of us call canopy cover conservation!:001_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.