Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

These seem like the real deal, especially if you have the right machine to put it on.

Anyone on here used/owns or had consensual sex with anyone who has seen one care to pass opinion?

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
11 minutes ago, Steve Bullman said:

Grindings look like they'd be easier to shovel too

 

Yes, but I’d already have an Avant on site so there’d be an easier clear up.

Posted

They do look impressive in the video, but:

 

Not easy to use, for removing lateral roots, I'd guess, compared with a conventional grinder ?

 

At £13k plus per unit, you'd need to be grinding a few stumps to see a return on your investment. Looks like they would need a wider base carrier machine too -no narrow access jobs.

 

I couldn't find a figure for replacement blades on the Dipperfox, but I'll wager they will be more £ and less resilient too?

 

The wood-waste produced by the Dipperfox can't exactly be used for mulching Mrs Miggins flower borders..

 

We've got an old Becker stump blade (uses a slightly similar principle) somewhere in the back of our shed. I must check and see if it's taken root there(!), since we last used it over a decade ago..

 

Sorry, I'll get my coat. 

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, green heart said:

They do look impressive in the video, but:

 

Not easy to use, for removing lateral roots, I'd guess, compared with a conventional grinder ?

 

At £13k plus per unit, you'd need to be grinding a few stumps to see a return on your investment. Looks like they would need a wider base carrier machine too -no narrow access jobs.

 

I couldn't find a figure for replacement blades on the Dipperfox, but I'll wager they will be more £ and less resilient too?

 

The wood-waste produced by the Dipperfox can't exactly be used for mulching Mrs Miggins flower borders..

 

We've got an old Becker stump blade (uses a slightly similar principle) somewhere in the back of our shed. I must check and see if it's taken root there(!), since we last used it over a decade ago..

 

Sorry, I'll get my coat. 

Would you consider selling your Becker?

 

Posted
56 minutes ago, green heart said:

They do look impressive in the video, but:

 

Not easy to use, for removing lateral roots, I'd guess, compared with a conventional grinder ?

 

At £13k plus per unit, you'd need to be grinding a few stumps to see a return on your investment. Looks like they would need a wider base carrier machine too -no narrow access jobs.

 

I couldn't find a figure for replacement blades on the Dipperfox, but I'll wager they will be more £ and less resilient too?

 

The wood-waste produced by the Dipperfox can't exactly be used for mulching Mrs Miggins flower borders..

 

Good points, and the little I’ve been able to glean over the internet points to operation not being as easy as the vid illustrates.

But I could sell the Bandit and buy this without losing money.

Take it to work on the back of the truck rather than a dedicated trailer..

 

Can’t seem to find any first hand experience though.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, green heart said:

We've got an old Becker stump blade (uses a slightly similar principle) somewhere in the back of our shed. I must check and see if it's taken root there(!), since we last used it over a decade ago..

 

I remember seeing an early demonstration of a becker in around 1988, impressive at first but soon blunt?

 

I had the same thoughts about the Dipperfox, how do you keep it sharp and what weight does it need to feed it down?

 

With a conventional TCT cutter tooth you can normally keep going through something nasty and then swap the tooth for a sharp one.

  • Like 2
Posted

I had a look a while back and would still consider for larger clearance works on a 8t+ excavator but for domestic stuff it doesn’t suit, primarily because you can remove the stumps but chasing lateral roots would be impossible. If it’s going on anything less than perfectly flat ground I feel it would be damaging on an avant or similar carrier over time (lateral stresses). We once thought putting a log splitting cone on a Vermeer would work great, which I feel is the same principle - the reality was it didn’t work and we consistently sheered fixing bolts (we tried free swinging, couldn’t get the weight in the log before it slipped), we were going to eventually damage the arms so scrapped it. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.