AI - A force for Good or Bad?

[Stubby]

6 hours ago, sime42 said:

What was wrong with Tom and Gerry? They were doing stuff like that 80 years ago. 

 

15 pages in and I don't think we've yet seen any justification for AI, other than funny cat videos, and certain medical and number crunching applications.

 

 

 

 

Tom and Gerry was brilliant with the original Hanna Barbera cartoons . Not so much the MGM ones .  I think it all dissapiars up its own arse when you have to use AI to detect if its AI you are looking at . 

Edited 4 hours ago by Stubby

[Squaredy]

1 hour ago, Stubby said:

Tom and Gerry was brilliant with the original Hanna Barbera cartoons . Not so much the MGM ones .  I think it all dissapiars up its own arse when you have to use AI to detect if its AI you are looking at . 

At least spelling errors tell me these posts are not AI.  I wonder if you can tell AI to mis-spell random words to make it look human produced?!

 

I have all the original Tom & Jerry on one DVD, with all the proper characters, such as the large black woman before she was replaced by a woke alternative.  I actually bought it for my kids before they discovered YouTube.

[Steven P]

The last DVDs I bought for The Boys had them in original format with a warning "might not represent current thinking"

[Stubby]

18 minutes ago, Squaredy said:

At least spelling errors tell me these posts are not AI.  I wonder if you can tell AI to mis-spell random words to make it look human produced?!

 

I have all the original Tom & Jerry on one DVD, with all the proper characters, such as the large black woman before she was replaced by a woke alternative.  I actually bought it for my kids before they discovered YouTube.

Sorry . Nerver been a good speller ! 

[Mesterh]

8 hours ago, sime42 said:

What was wrong with Tom and Gerry? They were doing stuff like that 80 years ago. 

 

15 pages in and I don't think we've yet seen any justification for AI, other than funny cat videos, and certain medical and number crunching applications.

 

 

 

 

From what Ive read AI is and is going to be replacing jobs in the very near future so its probably justified in that respect. Not that its good news for the vast majority of us though! If you google which jobs has ai replaced it is a bit of grim reading.  Nearly all manual worker jobs are safe for now but the way I see it if there is less call for admin based jobs due to AI replacing them then there will be a hell of a lot of people looking to work in the manual labour sector. Not good in the long run for any type of job.

 

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, Mesterh said:

From what Ive read AI is and is going to be replacing jobs in the very near future so its probably justified in that respect. Not that its good news for the vast majority of us though! If you google which jobs has ai replaced it is a bit of grim reading.  Nearly all manual worker jobs are safe for now but the way I see it if there is less call for admin based jobs due to AI replacing them then there will be a hell of a lot of people looking to work in the manual labour sector. Not good in the long run for any type of job.

 

Strengthens the case for a Universal Basic Income. 

[Stubby]

An AI chainsaw . Imagine that !

[Mesterh]

1 hour ago, Stubby said:

An AI chainsaw . Imagine that !

It might be a possibility. Once its ran for X amount of hours at X amount of workload it could shut down until its been serviced by an approved dealer. Or it might know who the operator is and how much runtime they have had and shut down due to HAVS or book them on to a refresher course etc. etc. Or if they smack the chain brake on too many times it will give them an electric shock to teach them a lesson!