Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

What could have been done better?


AHPP
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not my hedge, not my work. Saw this and thought it looked like a fairly poor job but I don't know why exactly. So what's wrong with it? How could it have been done better?

 

Apologies if it's anyone on here's work. Promise I'm not trying to be snarky. Just seemed like a good learning opportunity. 

 

75286F8C-B3AE-4DDF-85D1-D1671009AA45.thumb.jpeg.fc4affc18f4a67cee67f91cb295e6085.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

The vast majority of the regrowth is coming from the stools, very little from along the laid stems. Should the stems be nicked at points along their length to stimulate growth at the nicks? Ah hang on. You're meant to limb the stems before laying them down so the limb wounds do that, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of the pleacher (the laid bit) is to form a living stockproof barrier that feeds the stool while the new growth gets going. Most regrowth should come from the stool, 70-80%. The pleacher will eventually die off as the strong growth from the stool crowds it out, that strong growth will also naturally thin itself. In 20-30 years it is then ready to lay again.

If you don't cut the pleachers low, the next time you come to do it the growth you want as your new pleacher will be too high.

In your pic they should have been cut a bit lower and the gaps planted up. It looks to me that the horse(s) have been allowed to eat off some of the new growth from the stools which is not a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, AHPP said:

The vast majority of the regrowth is coming from the stools, very little from along the laid stems. Should the stems be nicked at points along their length to stimulate growth at the nicks? Ah hang on. You're meant to limb the stems before laying them down so the limb wounds do that, right?

Can’t make a silk purse out of a sows ear lad “ as my dad would say , whoever has done it has made the best out of a bad situation, the stems are too big on the first place to be layed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With what little I know, the stumps should have been cut at ground level and the pleachers laid low with most downward growth trimmed off. Any other growth weaved together and trimmed to a height just above the Pleachers. I was told the ideal way to lay pleachers is up hill, if that can't be done towards the sun. But if the growth is sparce but high the pleachers can be laid in either direction to fill gaps(a bit different if it's a competition). When the hedge has grown in 5/6 years then it can be laid in the correct direction. I was also though that the pleachers would only spout new growth were they touch the ground, like when Hazel is copiced and laid on the ground and staked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.