Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Impossible to comment on the stability from one photo like that. You’d need to carry out a picus test to see the extent of any decay. Even then it doesn’t necessarily mean the tree is unstable if there’s decay found. 
 

not sure on the issue of the council being liable, but if a proper inspection and report from a qualified professional was carried out and subsequently condemned the tree, they would have to reassess their original ruling I expect 

Posted

Have you requested to fell it and they refused. 

Any idea what coursed damage. 

Just get a long screw driver and see if you can push it into decayed area. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Steve Bullman said:

Impossible to comment on the stability from one photo like that. You’d need to carry out a picus test to see the extent of any decay. Even then it doesn’t necessarily mean the tree is unstable if there’s decay found. 
 

not sure on the issue of the council being liable, but if a proper inspection and report from a qualified professional was carried out and subsequently condemned the tree, they would have to reassess their original ruling I expect 

What are the consequences of having a bonfire close to a protected tree such that it may need felling?

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, openspaceman said:

What are the consequences of having a bonfire close to a protected tree such that it may need felling?

Wouldn’t even like to say! Wilful neglect? Unlawful damage? Someone like @daltontrees would know better than me 

Posted

I guess the onus would be on the council to prove it was done intentionally to cause damage to the tree. Probably an easy thing to claim ignorance on, unless you’re a tree surgeon of course 

Posted

Just because it has a TPO does not mean it can't be felled , you need to seek permission stating reasons / justification  , a report from a tree specialist would help in this scenario .  

  • Like 1
Posted

Same , get a report done and go from there . Pruning may be an option for stability , however its vitality and long term retention aint going to appear from a photo . K

Posted
10 hours ago, Steve Bullman said:

guess the onus would be on the council to prove it was done intentionally to cause damage to the tree.

I used to see a lot of trees in both gardens and woods where a fire had cause this sort of damage and I would say it was never intentional, just people, including gardeners and woodland workers, not realising the effect of even quite mild temperatures of over 70C.

Posted
18 hours ago, openspaceman said:

What are the consequences of having a bonfire close to a protected tree such that it may need felling?

That would be wilful damage, carrying unlimited fine on indictment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.