Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

NPTC or Lantra?


Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hi all

 

posted below is the advice i give to people about LvN

 

hope it helps

 

and just remember there is a big diferance between passing a competency test and being able to perform a wide range of duties. competence is mearly an assessment that you haave a genneral understanding and ca n achive a selection of roles to a basic standard, there is a gennerl misconception, one might argue fed by the HSE and employer that having 'a ticket' makes you able to do everything, this is one of the reasons why we have so many units these days as individual skills can be looked at, developed and a good foundation laid so that people can build a skills based on education experiance and guidance of peolpe who have been there before, these 3 key eliment are vital in safe work but also avoiding falling foul of the law.

 

cheers

 

arbocop

 

LANTRA vs NPTC: an explanation of LANTRAs role.

 

These are the Sector Skills Council (SSC), for land based industries, which means they are charged by government to set standards via the National Qualifications Framework, and produce a document called the Sector Qualifications Standard. This document contains information on the required competences for people carrying out tasks such as brush cutting, chainsaw use etc.

 

As an organization they have a training group called LANTRA-AWARDS. This group authorizes trainers and through a rigorous process ensure that the training given meets the National standards. The training given by Lantra Awards is split in to 2 methods, Training only and Integrated Training and Assessment (ITA).

 

The Training only method provides a high quality training in preparation for a separate assessment by an independent organization.

 

This separate assessment is usually required by law (such as pesticides applications or trailers on the highway) and tested by organizations such as NPTC or the DSA. Separate assessment may also be needed because in the opinion of the HSE the task being carried out is of such high risk that the candidate must be rigorously adjudicated to ensure the highest standard or competence (as is the case for professional chainsaw operation), and again this would be by an appropriate body such as the NPTC.

 

As these separate assessments are provided by an alternative provider there will be a separate charge by them for this.

 

Integrated Training & Assessment (ITA). This option is aimed at skills areas were there is no legal requirement for separate assessment, or the risk area is significantly lower, thus the HSE would not expect a separate, independent test. Examples of this may be Brush cutting & Strimming & Brushwood Chippers.

 

With ITA courses your trainer monitors your progress and carry’s out assessments of individual achievement, recording the outcome through the course.

 

If a candidate successfully completes the ITA they are issued a certificate stating that they have been TRAINED & ASSESSED rather than just trained. This meets the basic obligations in law.

 

As the course is both training and assessment, the fee is a single payment to the training provider.

 

A candidate may choose to have a separate assessment even if legally they are not obliged to do so, the only advantage of this is that it will demonstrate a more rigorous evaluation of their skills. It is important to note that the taught skills areas are exactly the same for both courses, but the ITA you are assessed as you progress through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowboy?:wtf: you're the one with one crappy little chipper and no staff:wave:

 

You must be very insecure,why do you alway start insulting people?:thumbsdown:

 

How does the size of some ones equipment,or number of staff make them more or less of a cowboy?:alberteinstein:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must be very insecure,why do you alway start insulting people?:thumbsdown:

 

How does the size of some ones equipment,or number of staff make them more or less of a cowboy?:alberteinstein:

 

I think you'll find that it was treemotion that started with the insults. It was him that called me a cowboy - not the other way around:heeeelllllooooo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.