advice or help

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

On reflection, if the land, as transferred, was subject to existing TPOs, it should have been flagged in the conveyancing surveys.  IF the TPO(s) pre-existed the land sale there could be a case of the conveyancing solicitor not having undertaken sufficient / diligent searches OR the TPO(s) were served AFTER the land sale, in which case, the landowner should have been notified.

 

The OP states that the purchase took place in Jan, the paperwork was received from council 6 months later (Jun) and the work was done in Aug.

 

If the TPO(s) pre-existed the land transfer either it should have been flagged in the conveyancing or the papers included in the bundle received from the council?

 

Something appears to be missing from this story somewhere....

 

I wouldn't be accepting any caution before the details were crystal!

[nepia]

Time for a new solicitor!

 

No offence intended re the Whispers comment jose but you know how things get changed in the telling.

[eggsarascal]

11 minutes ago, nepia said:

Time for a new solicitor!

 

No offence intended re the Whispers comment jose but you know how things get changed in the telling.

The 'Whispers comment', was justified, that's not suggesting Jose was, or is.

 

No way on this earth would I be taking a caution......... If the facts are  as presented.

[Khriss]

NEVER accept a Caution - ever ! If papertrail is as laid out here - I think the LA have slipped up . Plus a recent land sale should be up to scratch on any record of tree presence / eco stuff etc .  K

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

1 hour ago, eggsarascal said:

The 'Whispers comment', was justified, that's not suggesting Jose was, or is.

 

No way on this earth would I be taking a caution......... If the facts are  as presented.

You'll never take us alive Copper.....  

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

1 hour ago, Khriss said:

NEVER accept a Caution - ever ! If papertrail is as laid out here - I think the LA have slipped up . Plus a recent land sale should be up to scratch on any record of tree presence / eco stuff etc .  K

Counter assault with a harassment suit!  Slam-dunk 'em!!

[Khriss]

Frankly Kev , seen a few LA slack on tree inspection an wonder if this lot serving it up on guy cos they aint realised there was tree on land-sale ?? K

[eggsarascal]

10 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

You'll never take us alive Copper.....  

You keep Dixie....

[Gary Prentice]

4 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

I’d want to see the TPOs. Give notice of requirement to view them to LA, go in have a look, then be better informed to make a call....

 

it could be that the person supplying the “no TPOs” info checked the curtilage of his property BEFORE it was expanded rather than after....?

You don’t have to give notice to see TPOs, they ‘must’ be available for inspection. 

 

If they’re not on the website, tell the LA to get their act together and cart on.

Edited May 13, 2018 by Gary Prentice

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

49 minutes ago, Gary Prentice said:

You don’t have to give notice to see TPOs, they ‘must’ be available for inspection. 

 

If they’re not on the website, tell the LA to get their act together and cart on.

Perhaps make an appointment would be a better way of saying it?

 

They must have some basis upon which to “offer” a caution - we’ve arrived at a really dark place if it is all just made up bluster - definitely some parts of the tale missing from somewhere...?