Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Is "Cordwood" really a thing?


MonsterMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

On 02/11/2017 at 17:36, daltontrees said:

I think the etymology of quintal is from the word 'cent-' meaning hundred, rahtehr than 'quint-' menaing five. If you remember those teeny wee Fiats called the 500, pronounced 'seeng-co-chen-tay', the chen-tay it is hundred, and the pronounciation of it is a lot more like quinte than the 'seeng-co' bit is.

 

The first guy that paid for an imperial quintal and got a metric one must have been well pleased. It's basically twice as big.

Thanks for clearing that one up.

Is there any mention of moisture content with the various cord definitions?

Selling it by weight as in the quintal seems to be a better method.   I assume only by looking at the crates in Italy that they were either 500kg or 1000 kg in various different split sizes.  So 5 or 10 quintal crates, and the crate size may vary according to the wood.

A cord of poplar is going to be a lot lighter than a cord of beech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, skc101fc said:

 cordwood - the branchy bits or small diameter sawlog tops, usually for the firewood market,

The point for me is as above because roundwood  was worth more sent to the pulpmill than firewood delivered in.  The tops of bigger oaks were often too crooked to cut 2.4 metres for pulpwood . Prior to 1984 it didn't matter a lot because pulp mills accepted 1m lengths but with grapple loading (instead of hand loading) lorries the mills needed longer lengths and reacted to people trying to send tops in by specifying  the length had to pass down a 16" tube (mixed units I know). One of my employees, who doesn't seem to post here any more, was taught that "half a bend is no bend at all" and we would sneak in lengths with diagonal cut ends to meet the length and still be straight enough. Although I ended up with many arguments with the W anchor at the gate and often had arbitrary tonnage reductions overall it still paid to push the envelope but much got relegated to firewood .

 

In the distant past when axes did the snedding and crosscuts the, erm, crosscutting 4ft was a good compromise for handling and straightness. It also meant two opposing pieces could rest on the andirons of an inglenook and only burn at the point they overlapped, saving unnecessary cross cutting and splitting

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.