Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Next POTUS?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Next POTUS?

    • Hillary Clinton
      21
    • Donald Trump
      29


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Steven P said:

 

Smoke n mirrors... cannot argue your case so let us move on eh?

 

POTUS... irrelevant to UK asylum seekers

POTUS... again irrelevant to my background or current life.

 

 

POTUS... rapist who you seam to look up to and apologise for.

As I thought BS 

 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

Smoke n mirrors... cannot argue your case so let us move on eh?

 

POTUS... irrelevant to UK asylum seekers

POTUS... again irrelevant to my background or current life.

 

 

POTUS... rapist who you seam to look up to and apologise for.

You stuck your nose in on 42’s post regarding kids etc

Get on with your work you nosey bugger. 
Irrelevant 🤔is that SP talk for I can’t answer so I’ll talk shite repeatedly. You clown 🤡 

Anyway it’s leaf blower time, far more important than your crap IMG_1307.thumb.jpeg.502e98c6a0b79ca7ddbe95d8af2ade75.jpeg💩 

Edited by Johnsond
Posted
4 hours ago, peds said:

 

I believe the medical term is "jiggled about a bit too much", and the mechanism by which it occurs is the fact that they are there, dangling, by a pair of very thin threads. 

I like how you are trying to divert from your abhorrent opinion about women's lives being worthless by making small talk about ballsacks.

 

I hesitate to ask, crossing my fingers that the answer is no, for their sake... but... are you married, do you have children?

 

Woke bullying doesn't affect me any more, I acquired natural immune to it. Have you ever tried proactively debunking the leftist/liberal outrage talking points? Like, for example, take a liberal media outrage story about a teenage girl in Texas dying of sepsis, input her name into google followed by "debunked".

 

You get a whole nother narrative and facts which were previously omitted. The picture becomes more complicated and neuenced.

 

Doesn't mean it's stops being tragic, but it puts thing in perspective. When everything is broad strokes and moral rage, the details get ignored. Thing is, perspective can only be reached when we want it. Telling others about the omitted facts is met with denial. The curiosity has to come from within.

 

I was attempting to reflect back at you the kind of mechanistic moralistic generalities the leftist establishment has forced on us for years. **************** the individual, the greater good etc. They zoom in on a minority case, dramatize it, sentimentalize it, then call for a draconian societal overhaul based on emotion aroused by said case.

 

Granted, the "right" does it too, and it stinks. And the right also get hysterical about stuff for agitprop purposes.

 

 

 

 

Posted

Open forum... we can all look, all answer.

 

'Irrelevant' because.... you are banging on about them on another thread and am dropping subtle hints to keep the threads on track, not just spamming the world. Guess that went right over your head?

Posted
1 hour ago, GarethM said:

The man pays more tax and NI, than I probably turnover with 2 businesses.

lol I hope you mean Musk Gareth. I’m certainly not a wealthy man bud. I work my arse off to try and get ahead both as a sole contractor and small business owner. I don’t buy into the whole left wing envy shit. I could easily have took a cushy office job but to hell with that, turn you into a right opinionated boring bugger that would. 

  • Like 2
Posted

They really, really needed to stick the "convicted rapist" badge on Trump, but people didn't believe it.  A little investigation and intellectual honesty showed the whole thing was a lawfare hit-job.

 

If the flagrantly sleasy way the trial was conducted, the people involved in the prosecution, and even the law being changed to facilitate the case being brought, wasn't enough, check this out.

 

WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COM

A 2012 episode of the"Law & Order: SVU" referencing a rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room...

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Steven P said:

Open forum... we can all look, all answer.

 

'Irrelevant' because.... you are banging on about them on another thread and am dropping subtle hints to keep the threads on track, not just spamming the world. Guess that went right over your head?

No it would be ideal if you’d just stop your blagging and just answer a couple of simple questions 🤷‍♂️it ain’t bloody hard. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.