Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Next POTUS?  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Next POTUS?

    • Hillary Clinton
      22
    • Donald Trump
      29


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

And Fred West could lay a bloody good patio (by all accounts)

I worked with a guy that had Fred the weatherman as a teacher, Altrincham Grammar if memory serves.

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Steven P said:

 

Though you will dispute this, Savilles case never got to the desk of Starmer for him to make a decision on it, the fault lies further down the chain with collection and presenting evidence to the CPS, and (not a fault) a reluctance of victims to come forward to help make that case believing - as is often the case - that they are the only ones, won't be believed.

 

CPS doesn't dictate what is investigated of course.

Getting the truth out of Starmer is probably as difficult as getting an answer out of you ya blagger. Actually I should  revise that statement as getting a straight answer out of you is proving to be impossible, I’m maybe doing Starmer a disservice. 

Edited by Johnsond
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

wasn't it a massive coincidence when so much about saville  came to light after he was dead, it's almost like nobody in authority dare say anything or allow any action to be taken, maybe he had to be dead so he couldn't name names. and then 400 odd people came forward and the bbc were safe.

I say the bbc because I cant think of another outfit that has a statue of an incestuous pedophile displayed outside its building.

there could be more in high ranking positions.

 

400 people didn't read the papers that morning "Ahh,he is dead, I'll speak up", there was a snowball effect, soon as a couple of stories in the press others thought "So I wasn't alone, there were others" and also made their complaint / allegations. Is often the case with the rich and powerful

Posted
2 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

400 people didn't read the papers that morning "Ahh,he is dead, I'll speak up", there was a snowball effect, soon as a couple of stories in the press others thought "So I wasn't alone, there were others" and also made their complaint / allegations. Is often the case with the rich and powerful

That mental illness must make you unable to answer a straight question or to have and shame at all. Honestly your ability to just brass it out is something only a sleaze bag MP could match. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, sime42 said:

The "me too" effect. 

Nah far from it 42, it’s nice of you to keep stepping in to cover for his very very odd behaviour and inability to answer a simple straight question, but in reality you ain’t helping him. Saying that you claimed not to know what I was talking about the other day after reading the post 🤷‍♂️🤦

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Mick Dempsey said:

He hid in plain sight. 

Do you rally think that those security types in charge of The Royal Family weren't aware of Saville's activities?

They mustn't have dug very deep. Which makes you wander what they are paid for. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Nah far from it 42, it’s nice of you to keep stepping in to cover for his very very odd behaviour and inability to answer a simple straight question, but in reality you ain’t helping him. Saying that you claimed not to know what I was talking about the other day after reading the post 🤷‍♂️🤦

 

WTF?

It was a comment in accordance with this you Muppet.

 

59 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

400 people didn't read the papers that morning "Ahh,he is dead, I'll speak up", there was a snowball effect, soon as a couple of stories in the press others thought "So I wasn't alone, there were others" and also made their complaint / allegations. Is often the case with the rich and powerful

 

Nothing to do with you. Again. It's just that you jumped in front in your haste to pose that cracker of a question. Again. Go and look up the Me Too movement, #MeToo or something. Harvey Weinstein and all that.

 

Anyway, as I keep telling you, the answer that you're eternally searching for is 42.

Posted
3 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

wasn't it a massive coincidence when so much about saville  came to light after he was dead, it's almost like nobody in authority dare say anything or allow any action to be taken, maybe he had to be dead so he couldn't name names. and then 400 odd people came forward and the bbc were safe.

I say the bbc because I cant think of another outfit that has a statue of an incestuous pedophile displayed outside its building.

there could be more in high ranking positions.

You'd think you'd know someone after 20 years.

Even if you were thick as mince, you'd think that your best of the regiment security detail would have a clue: 
 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Programme reveals Savile produced PR handbook for royals, some of which was passed on to the Queen

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.