Potus ???

[GarethM]

7 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

the link you posted allows the user to select interval, selecting 2025 the figure is 71405.

The 616 000 is total removals for the last five or so years

No idea, it was like trawling through mud finding data.

 

One news thing said 11k a month, still more than our shower of excrement.

 

And a bloody good advert for not jumping the border and waisting time and money with the smugglers.

[Steven P]

So that's it, 70,000, just over, out of all the immigrants in the US - and remembering that a good chunk of them were living in the US during Trumps first term in office when he failed to remove them.

 

For the working man in the US (the ones who Springsteen resonates with)... nothing.. rising prices in Walmart maybe? Spin that as a benefit?

[tree-fancier123]

yes, but remember encounters at the border are down markedly since Trump took over, basically because he's sent the message that they won't be allowed to stay

 

and rising prices in Walmart - ok some pain, but many Americans agree with Trump trying to rebuild a manufacturing base and wean off from cheap foreign factories. Otherwise it's just a service economy

[GarethM]

32 minutes ago, Steven P said:

So that's it, 70,000, just over, out of all the immigrants in the US - and remembering that a good chunk of them were living in the US during Trumps first term in office when he failed to remove them.

 

For the working man in the US (the ones who Springsteen resonates with)... nothing.. rising prices in Walmart maybe? Spin that as a benefit?

Remind me how many your south of the Scottish border poster boy has removed from the UK in the same time ?.

 

Donald has been in office since January, plus since his wall started going up those illegal crossings have gone down nicely haven't they.

 

But, no we couldn't have a solution could we!.

 

Because like a lot of subjects, you prefer to just refuse to actually have a position other than come one come all to our lands of honey and benefits.

Edited May 18 by GarethM

[Johnsond]

59 minutes ago, GarethM said:

plus since his wall started going up those illegal crossings have gone down nicely haven't they

That would be a “ fact” Gareth, you know facts often don’t go down well here. 

Encounters at the border are at the lowest since records began 25 years ago. The current administration in the USA said what they would do pre election and are fulfilling the campaign promises. Pretty much the exact opposite of what’s happening here. 

Edited May 18 by Johnsond

[GarethM]

What's probably ironic for Stephen the man that believes in absolutely no borders, check points, passports or controls, then gives a healthy donation to "medicins sans frontier".

 

Be cheaper just to leave a donation for the dinghy crossings and cut out the middleman!.

[Johnsond]

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/eric-boreczky-3a5397b_kamala-attacked-hurs-integrity-and-lied-ugcPost-7329850934547652609-Tuci?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAADB-kJ0BWrJUW5tVr2sxqvep_SKvMEUK9bk&utm_source=screenshot_social_share&utm_campaign=copy_link

 

Just a little reminder of how Trump made it to the white house again. Don’t lie to people and tell them what they are seeing is not the reality of a situation Ie he’s as sharp as a tack in private. 
The book in the pic “ not photoshopped “ should be a good read. 😂😂

 

Edited May 18 by Johnsond

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

Just a little reminder of how Trump made it to the white house again. Don’t lie to people and tell them what they are seeing is not the reality of a situation Ie he’s as sharp as a tack in private.

I reckon that the same will be said of Trump's successor. 

[Johnsond]

6 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I reckon that the same will be said of Trump's successor. 

You might be right Mark but I’m sure a good few of you on here argued for the old child sniffer. 

[Mark J]

17 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You might be right Mark but I’m sure a good few of you on here argued for the old child sniffer. 

It's a sad state of affairs when it comes down a two senile old men. Only one of them has been been found liable for sexual abuse though, and it's not Sleepy Joe.