All Activity

Yes. And people have a right to be who they are, closer to or further from animals or possessing more or less of any other characteristic. Birds of a feather flock together, which generally works. Africans scrat about mud huts for food and dancing. Londoners scrat about Canary Wharf for money and Porsches. Both peoples are surrounded by others with similar outlooks, goals, needs, wants etc so people understand each other and are able to get on and interact with relatively similar and equal understandings and demands of each other. The other way to look at it is to use intelligence as a metric. James Watson, half of the Watson and Crick known for discovering DNA brought up the issue a few years ago. In 2007, the scientist, who once worked at the University of Cambridge's Cavendish Laboratory, told the Times newspaper that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really". From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46856779

No. I'm saying you might be if you can't keep up with what I'm saying. But how about we be civil instead and we might advance discourse and human understanding. It's not for me to design the world. Nobody can. People try, which is why it's goosed. But indicatively, no dole, no state housing, no state jobs where people can be hired at the expense of someone who has no say in who's hired. It relies on the eradication (or bloody close to) of the state, which is why it's hard to visualise. We're used to the state. But we don't need it.

Hmmm, wonder what JD Vance has been doing this week... Probably learning how to drive steam trains, stoking fires I think

Just to note and with extreme venom of course, London has millions of migrants, 100+ years of small boat crossings full of them - for a phenomenon that has only been occurring since Brexit. If you read this thread you would persuaded that all these small boat crossings are responsible for 100% of the UKs crime. No, say 150%. Got to ask, is it the crime that winds you up, or the nationality of the criminal. I think you have it all topsy-turvy, the actual crime regardless of the criminal is what you need to look at. Not the small portion of all crimes committed by a small portion of small boat crossers, and a tiny portion of all immigrants. Todays excitement appears to be sexual assaults.. in the UK predominantly carried out by white men.

this 'closer to animals' notion - surely all humans are animals? The raping and other sex crimes by migrants always gets the public's blood up, but its the cost of keeping them that I dont like. Even if no migrants ever raped, they would still be a nightmare, putting huge strain on public resources

are you saying you are the result of Fetal alcohol syndrome ?

ok, give an example of this and how it would work.

See. Not mental. Not drunk. Comes from a coherent ideology of individual rights.

Of course they don't. One person's rights end where another person's rights begin.

Vastly reduce the number of them here by eradicating the public property and public money that harbours them. Ensure women can carry guns.

150 diesel as they run Kubota, early 125 ran Kohler 23hp then switched to Honda they bought engines in bulk and what is cheapest at the time. Refurbished can mean anything, lick of paint covers up rust, If you can push to £10k you should get something.

I certainly don't think anybody has a "right" to rape anybody, especially children. I would happily see them executed. in fact if it were made into a job I'll apply to throw the ****************n' switch myself.

It boils down to believing in the rights of the individual. If you don't believe in those rights, fine. Plenty of people don't.

As far as I can see, you don't like colored people, you think they are more likely to rape than white people, because you think they are closer to animals, despite this you still don't mind them coming here, and you think they should have the same rights as everyone else, you don't think there should be any public property, you don't think there should be any public money, you think as long as there's people who are happy with them that's ok, you lost me completely on "brighton types" the reality is their only here mainly for the dole, but if one turned up at you door he can mow your lawn, and you would invite him into your home, would you tell him you don't like colored people who rape, and come here just to commit crimes and claim dole before you let him in, or after,? you think anyone who want's a black man can have one, but shouldn't pay for anyone elses black man, you think if nobody shoots at boats everything will be fine and we can all argue about husqvarna vs stihl. and you say this is based on your "world view" , , , , And what is this feckin' planet called that your on? and perhaps more importantly,, how would this stop the raping of women and children by these colored animals you spoke of?

Don't worry. He'll have found your posts.

If that is a reference to me, I've long moved on from the Efi saga and joined the Kubota V1505 club However during that Efi period of woe I did make contact with several others experiencing the same or similar issues. Everyone, like me, found the dealers to be less that satisfactory and ended up trading their Efi powered chipper in for diesels. Costly move but the stress and uncertainty was just too toxic. I notice the posts asking about problems have largely dried up, hopefully the updated 40hp Efi will prove to be more reliable. I liked the Efi when it worked...

^Maternal drinking rears its head.^ If you can't follow it, that's fine but I've put it down coherently.

^daytime drinking rears it's head.^

It might be the extreme end of the argument but the logic is the same. I believe in your right to have a dick as long as you don't force it on anyone. I believe in someone's right to live here as long as they don't force it on anyone (i.e. they keep off property belonging to people who don't want them on it - see above on the absence of public property).

Why do you care about the opinions of the scum in Westminster about what is legal or illegal immigration? If they said it was illegal to live in Norfolk but shop in Suffolk, would you respect it? If they said you couldn't move to Wales, would you respect it?

I generally don't like brown and black people and think that they're more likely than an equivalent number of white English/Euro types to perform crimes like rape because they're closer to animals like that. And I'm still in favour of open borders and them possessing the same rights as any other human anywhere. The important bit is that I'm also in favour of there being no public property and no public money. So they can arrive here however they want, as long as whoever owns where they touch down is happy with it and people are happy to feed/trade with them wholly voluntarily. The reality that would quickly become apparent to the Brighton types is that nobody wants them and they're mainly coming here for the dole. The desirable ones would be welcomed because if a black man turns up at my door with a great business plan or claiming to be a really good gardener or something, I'm probably going to invite him in. Anyway. No public property or money and the problem solves itself. Anybody who wants a black man can have one. Anyone who doesn't want one doesn't have to have one or pay for anyone else's. Nobody needs to shoot at any boats. Peace will reign and we can go back to arguing about Stihl vs Husqvarna.

Coming from someone who changed career later on in life ..need i say more ...yeah I'm sure i don't know much about arboriculture ,only my first placement was when I was 13...I was using a chipper back then ..an entec 35 , some of the machines now built are 💩 built down to a price like everything ... but I'm sure you know best I'm always wary of people who change careers midlife ,or try and re invent themselves...me I'm neither...but European stuff is built better than British stuff ,in the way of chippers . What do u want to know mick? Drop the bitchy carpy attitide first .

Whatever you use, remember to twang it and say ‘That is going NOWHERE.’

It’s nothing like the same logic - that’s a nonsensical twisted argument. Nobody is suggesting ‘only foreigners’ are responsible. It is surely ridiculous to invite/accept/welcome unknown groups of random men with a far higher-than-average predilection for such crimes into our country when we already have more than enough of our own scumbags committing such acts?