Johnsond
-
Posts
6,925 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
63
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Calendar
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Johnsond
-
mandatory target for reducing electricity use - Elocast ELOCAST.COM Elevated online broadcasting. Let Elocast be your next stop on the road to your newest adventure. Well I’m pretty sure I’ve heard those phrases in the not too distant past, “ flatten the curve, mandatory etc etc “ . Create a problem then come up with a solution for the masses. VDL 🙄right up there with the elites whom ( hopefully English teacher Dempsey approves ) you can be pretty damn sure won’t have her curve or bank balance flattened. Wonder what will be next 🤷♂️🤷♂️restrict farmers in the EU from producing food,nah that would be tin hat stuff surely !!. Starting to look very much like old Trump was bang on the mark when he warned ze Germans that they were making a mistake relying so heavily on Russia, I do recall him being mocked for saying this at the time.
-
Yeah you ain’t wrong, im sure the energy bills for all the royal and grace and favour properties kept in tip top condition are not putting too much of a strain on the royal purse. I’m no republican and have done my bit in the military including a good few stints at Buck, St James etc but I do look at the utter detached luxury that the royal family and hangers on by an accident of birth live in, and wonder what kind of set up is it that is being maintained. I’ve been to a couple of the royal estates and seen how immaculate and well looked after they are, on the other side of the coin ive just spent a few days alongside on weather in Great Yarmouth and quite frankly walking around and just looking at the surroundings in places it’s utterly rundown and depressing, sadly I know it’s not alone.
-
One look at the nhs should tell you how it would go. Sad really as in principle I’m for it but the reality is it would probably end up as a total cluster, they’d probably still be working from home due to covid as HMRC and DVLA did.
-
There was an excellent program on bbc24 at about 0300 last night in regards the profits being made by the nuclear and renewables providers ( EDF in particular have benefited hugely, the fact it’s a French owned company is even worse but I guess that’s capitalism) indeed they are all tied to the price of gas, I’m not surprised it was on in the early hours as quite frankly it was staggering the profits being made and how the system is loaded in favour of the companies producing the energy. How or why this is not making daily headlines and causing outrage I do not know. People seem more bothered about utter trivialities rather than the real reason behind the rises.
-
Good for you Mark 👍in regards your education, im currently financing the 3rd one of my kids whom/who (😂) has gone that route through Uni, as for the tangent thing, time and place bud time and place, that grammar bitch behaviour displayed by you and Dempsey is beneath you both “ well I’d like to think it is”
-
Who said they should not be scrutinised?? They absolutely should be held to account in regards their performance whilst carrying out the role in question. Right at the start of me replying to your post and basically lamenting at the current state of things I said the level of scrutiny and tactics involved are not helping things. You and Dempsey both resorted to trying to be smart arses about minor grammatical errors ( normally a last resort ) and totally running off at different tangents. Anyway it’s good to see your university education being put to good use pointing out such things.
-
Lol 😌👍result eh you and Dempsey both biting now eh the queens of grammar, and I’m ok for English tuition eh, You are scraping the barrel a bit Mark. Exactly as I said earlier whom or who ( I’ll let you bitches grind your teeth) would want the job, as you’ve just pointed out your every past word is scrutinised ie Truss and the Monarchy comment that you’ve just made.
-
Ok are we now back to Boris, “ he’s out now isnt he .” I thought it was about whom (😂) would want the job not whom (😂) used to have it, now if you want a totally different level of bullshit stupidity to chat about I’ll easy swap to covid legislation and killing granny etc I didn’t realise you were a royalist nowadays.
-
As mentioned previously Mark as long as it isn’t illegal Well if you are waiting for a squeaky clean holier than thou politician to come along with zero history or character flaws to occupy 10 Downing st then good luck. You have more chance of finding a virgin bride up the big market on a weekend.
-
Lol 😂 easy Dempsey your bitchiness is showing itself eh. Well if it grates how I write then man up and take it. I’m not in anyway hurt or blaming the press you’ve just created that in a little thumb whirring text frenzy. My initial reaction to Marks post was pretty much alluding or even agreeing to the lack of current talent but also commenting “whom “ ( suck it up sweet cheeks) in their right mind etc etc etc the rest of your post you’ve pretty much let your shit and sugar complex regards myself get the better of you. Go back and check some of the headlines regarding the previous occupants of number 10 to see how kind the press weren’t!!.
-
Maybe that’s where we are different then Mark as I’ve no interest in what stupid mistakes or errors of judgment people made in their private life many many years ago. As long as it doesn’t effect their ability to do the job or it isn’t illegal I’m not bothered. Good to see the scope of this chat is expanding 👍👍I’m on 1800-0600 so normally a long night but seems you and Dempsey are bored too👍👍
-
Oh ok Mark thank you for your concern, that’s very considerate of you 😌but I’m fine and dandy bud, sat offshore on a weather day just filling in my time commenting on your initial post, seems in the excitement of it all you and Dempsey have read a lot more into it than it deserves.
-
Irrelevant mark regardless of the fact you may well indeed be right but the point stands Mark as well you know the level of scrutiny is horrific, not just on the individual but also immediate family etc. By the way you show me anyone and I include myself in that whom hasn’t made a mistake or ****************ed up at some point in life and I’ll show you a thousand who have. The MSM game of build them up and pull them down is not helping anyone.
-
You’ve lost me here Mark not sure what you are referring to in this post bud I didn’t realise anyone was in a rage Mark and I thought I’d just commented on whom would want the job etc etc Where are you getting all your links from seeing as you have risen above it all and disengaged ??
-
No you don’t have to worry yourself about a list, You had a bad day or something?? Seems you are in full on arse mode tonight, I stand by what I said “ whom in their right mind “ would want to put themselves and families in that position and the level of scrutiny that comes with it, I know I certainly wouldn’t. Number and current standard of MPs vs current population 🤔 I wouldn’t say it’s attracting loads or even lots of the right people at all.
-
TV, Radio, Social Media, Papers etc etc You know fine well how it works Mark
-
I did read it, in the same context read the post you are being a smart arse about, I’m on about the role in general not any particular individual hence the comment “ whom in their right mind “
-
Yeah really Mick if I said shit you’d say sugar, lying hypocrite???? Which PM is that you are referring too ?? They all can easily be tarred with that brush as far as I can remember. My point was aimed at the role itself not at any particular previous PM.
-
There is genuine scrutiny based upon performance and then there is what we see nowadays ie saturation media attacks and intrusion into every aspect of an individual’s private life as and when they deem it suitable, it benefits no one the level to which MSM has dropped or the tactics they use.
-
Can’t disagree with much of that Mark. Quite frankly whom in their right mind would want to take on the job with the level of media intrusion and scrutiny it entails.
-
I’m sure Labours Harvard and Oxford educated career political Shadow would be more in touch with normal people’s feelings eh Mark, her and Ed must be sitting pretty financially I’d say. Anyway on a serious note, Genuinely whom ie which party or what form of government would you see as the answer ??.
-
Hi All. After a bit of info from any 130max owners whom have the mill set up in static mode. I’m after the height of the cutting scale (at its maximum) that moves up with the head and ends up sticking up above it when the mill is at max cutting height, also max width of the head once set up. Cheers
-
Nope it’s a good show, the episode that Boris hosted was a good one. You do tend to jump to some strange conclusions 42.
-
Insane considering the amount of hydro power Andy.
-
Did it make you go all wet and warm 42 !!. The sad thing is the MSM will turn on and decimate his successor be it Truss now or Starmer in the long term and just as it’s intended to be it will be gobbled up by the masses, in the meantime nothing of any consequence ever changes.
