Johnsond
-
Posts
6,576 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
61
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Calendar
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Johnsond
-
It’s your obsession with my cock that’s coming over as rather strange if you hadn’t realised.
-
The riots are a disgrace and the attacker deserves the death penalty. That’s my pals view I can’t speak for others.
-
He knew two parents SP and yes I’ve spoke to him. He lives in Southport near the building where the attack took place not anywhere near the attacker.
-
🤷♂️I guess it’s a modern definition. Mass Casualty Event rather than victim. The definition and explanation are all there. Me personally I’d not classify the current numbers of injuries to the police “ as abhorrent as they are “ as such a thing.
-
Like I said right at the beginning a good starting point would be to police everything fairly without any sign of favour or prejudice. Again as I said at the beginning the perception “ be it real or not “ is behind a lot of the trouble we see right now. Yeah 42 I’ve replied to every comment sharpish apart from the 6 in a row last night that were along the lines you guys use to refer to as “ rants” that were put up by some weirdo obsessed with my cock 🤷♂️😂. What have I personally experienced??
-
Definitely some competition to the previous leader, it’s filled a pram 6 times that’s good enough for me. I’ve not denied a single thing, please post evidence if you think I have. My sole statement has been that all rioters etc etc etc etc you still seem to be toiling with comprehension regarding this.
-
Even more bizarre that it was assigned to the injured policeman over the last few days. Who know Doug, possibly a modern term, as for shipman I think he probably doesn’t count as he fed them into the system over time.
-
Not sure why you are implying you are observing this from afar 42 ! Im not arguing, all I’ve said is the same thing right through. If others want to read the boogey man’s presence into it and get worked up that’s not my issue. Look at the news !! You think Dave ( isn’t it good to use a real name) having an opinion either way is having any effect on this !!. What I will say is a lack of acknowledgment by Starmer that there is more of an issue than just the far right thuggery line he is quoting repeatedly is not helping matters at all.
-
I stated “be it real or perceived “ read the post and look at the context, I’m not rioting but I’ve enough common sense to see why tensions have risen year in year out.
-
Not correct in any way
-
You are factually wrong, as much as you want to classify the attacks on the police as a certain scale of event( which you did ) , they just aren’t. Yes police have been injured but cities have not been wrecked and there have been no mass casualty events by the common definition of the phrase. You are embarrassing yourself with your giggling I’d say. But if it makes you happy then it’s no big issue for me.
-
42 you are all replying and getting worked up over one statement. That is that all riots or rioting should be policed equally and fairly without prejudice regardless of race, religion or political affiliation. Now if that is an issue to some of you that is not my issue.
-
Where did I say no violent attacks have been carried out ?? Put up evidence. The evidence and factual information I posted to show you what a genuine “mass casualty event “ is and its definition is obviously not to your liking. School yard infantile digs at my surname just make you look a bit desperate I’m afraid, you seem to be looking for a lot that is not there. The master eh 😂😂😂😂😂
-
Are you struggling to understand the simple statement I keep putting up that all rioters regardless of race, religion or political affiliation should be policed exactly the same ?? What part of that is so difficult for you to come to grips with. I’ve not changed the definition of anything, your understanding of what constitutes such an event is just wrong, it’s as simple as that. I’ll go down the well worn route of asking you to show me where I have stated that I in any way shape or form defend the current riots. No waffle or what you think etc just post the statement where I said such a thing, for a man of your ability, wit and guile it should be easy.
-
It’s not my definition by the way, ok the new wit and guile master has woken sorry spoken. That’s you referencing male appendages again 🤷♂️bit early for that id say. Is it racist filth to say all riots should be approached in the same way and policed in the same way ??.
-
Oh dear oh dear SP you are obviously that blinded by your biased view you have not read over the past few days where I’ve condemned all rioting 100% . And stated multiple times that the police approach should be the same regardless of race, religion or political affiliation. Can you show me anywhere on here where anyone has supported or defended the riots. No word games no twisting just evidence of a statement or post where a defence or support has been offered.
-
Well after 6 full on incoherent, demented and totally presumptive unanswered posts I’d say without a doubt the Arbtalk rabid left has a new standard bearer. Topics ranging from destruction of cities by the far right, American slang words for the male appendage ( the urge to go down that route is normally displayed by one of your former leaders) that are apparently meant to be funny or an insult, justifying Islamic terrorist murders due to a religious “ Beef” and some incoherent ramblings about my blind spot 🤷♂️. You presume a lot based upon nothing concrete, I’ll educate you in the term “ mass casualty event “ as it’s something you seem to not understand. I’ll put up the definition and a classic example for you to mull over. Just an observation based upon the rather rambling disjointed rhetoric from last night, was your attempt at reasoned debate somewhat obscured by an alcoholic haze 🤔.
-
That’s enough for me in regards yourself.
-
I’m sure a lot of officers have been injured, apply the law equally and fairly to those responsible. Im sure he will be disgusted, again apply the law equally and fairly tho those responsible. The perception of a two tier system of policing has developed over time and will continue to fester unless people see the law being applied equally and fairly regardless of race religion or political affiliation 🤷♂️it’s not rocket science.
-
I’ll keep this simple as you seem to be struggling with what I’m saying and have for days. Treat all those rioting the same regardless of race, religion or political affiliation. If you are struggling with that get someone to explain it. I’ll leave you to your so called middle ground and support for islamic terror arracks.
-
Those who riot regardless of race or religion should be treat equally. A religious war. You gotta to be ****************ing kidding. Slaughtering defenceless innocents, your whole argument and credibility has just evaporated, defending Islamic terrorism 🤷♂️disgusting immoral low life words far worse than any brick throwing thug.
-
Absolute rubbish
-
Ok please show me where the mass casualties are you described. Manchester arena, London Bridge, Lee Rigby etc etc those are mass casualty events. Riots are Riots and regardless of who is involved the law should be applied equally. Put your ludicrous left wing bias aside for a minute and read what you are arguing against.
-
Put the rest of the post up to add some context, actually I’ll add it just to allow some idea of why I asked the question. So in your world you are judged on what you alone find a comment may suggest ?? Talk about fascism eh 🤷♂️
-
There’s a lot of stuff going on in your head that equals zero. All I’ve said is the law needs to be applied equally You can’t seem to cope with that at all.
