Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

David Humphries

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    23,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by David Humphries

  1. Thanks for letting the forum know Ben Please keep the thread updated on Chris's condition & recovery. Thoughts with him & his family .
  2. Interesting perspective Mat Roots shot or shallow plate? Any thoughts regarding wind load on its newly exposed neighbours? .
  3. Would be interesting to know what the surrounding woodland cover was like at the time that this late 1700's drawing was made by the 'Major' who it's named after. Looks clear, but guess that what ever was there got left out to enhance the subject I haven't visited it for a decade or so, any idea what species of chip has been used Mr Agent-Arb? .
  4. Looks dead Oops, wrong time of year
  5. What would you constitute as a 'tickle' in terms of reduction spec on a 100' plane? Do you think management of trees with decay issues like this one is directly influenced by tragedies such as the fatality of the pregnant women in Kissena park in Queens last August, which I guess is relatively local and still fresh in the conscience of the public and tree managers alike ? .
  6. We asked the man from BSI, and he say.................no ! .
  7. I have absolutely no management concerns over the first set of images of the Chestnut Jonny. It's in woodland and even if it was of more concern regarding its profile it's protected by surrounding canopies. I merely posted it as a thread starter as you quite rightly suggest, it's a fine example .
  8. Anyone have experiences/images of failures associated with these type of cankers? .
  9. here's a roadside Prunus that would have me looking a bit closer if I was managing it. .
  10. here's a substantial perennial canker on an oak branch which led us to reduce the height of the affected branch. .
  11. I've noted it before, but not really given it a lot of thought. More than likely to be superficial as a stability issue but worth considering on an individual basis depending on degree of circumference infected. Here on Ash on a boundary veteran in Worcestershire. .
  12. a thread the other day got me to thinking about what's been posted up on this issue in the past (not alot from what I can gather) http://arbtalk.co.uk/forum/tree-health-care/70269-help-damage-limes.html Definiton; fungal associated die back of the bark and cambium on stems (sometimes on branches) showing as a 'target' where annual callus material is layed down in an attempt to compartmentalize the infected area. Often focused at a point of a failed branch attachment or stub. Caused by Nectria and other fungal canker sp (and less so by bacteria sp) (various resources; Butin, Lonsdale) Here on a Horse chestnut at work, which I've probably posted in the past on other threads. .
  13. Did you manage to give it a name and the type of colonisation strategy/type of decay associated with it? .
  14. Hello Peter, What's your preferred climbing system for this type of tree traverse? Has anyone considered the issue as to why the tree is shutting down and the roots aren't sustaining the peripheral canopy? .
  15. Page 26 http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/fcpg13.pdf/$FILE/fcpg13.pdf .
  16. In the Forestry commissions guide on Hazards from Trees (2000) David Lonsdale states that wind load on a target canker that has affected up to 25% of the stem circumference of a trunk can cause a snap and should probably be viewed with caution and that reduction or felling should be considered where there is a risk to target particularly where a tree is open to exposure. Having said this, I haven't seen an example of a stem target canker having failed. .
  17. Shame on you Mr Curtis, it's all about the sacrifice .
  18. Looks like 'target canker' any wider context shots? .
  19. Not really Tony, we see such a wide variety of appearance in the Ganoderma fruiting bodies One latin phrase adopted for morphological appearance is possibly quite limited. .
  20. I don't have a huge amount of experience looking at the decay of X polymorpha Dan. Photographed the fruit bodies a good few times but not looked at associated basal trunk failures. Similar to what Tony says, I understand it to be a soft rot decay similar to Kd where the cellulose is degraded. Shame you've not had the opportunity to show us a cross section .
  21. I would think those are the fruit bodies of Ganoderma applanatum .
  22. Nice one Bet there's some small (and a few large) mammals that will appreciate the natural bridge .
  23. Had a sniff around this earlier today and remembered that I had listed it down as a wound parasite (sapwood exposed) on an assignment I did a couple of years ago. Which would of been based on reference material and I think this corresponds with what is listed in the Francis Schwarze/Engels/Mattheck Fungal Strategies So perhaps there is conflicting information out there. .
  24. Fungal record database has it named as Hemipholiota populena and red data listed. Only 54 UK records listed. Not one that I have knowingly come across British Fungi - record details .
  25. Got it down from where Dean? .

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.