Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

AA Teccie (Paul)

Veteran Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,532

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by AA Teccie (Paul)

  1. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Is it Friday already gentlemen? Whilst I have seen this fungi before I don't recognize it as being anything pathogenic (problematic) more soil borne, maybe saprophytic (living off dead wood / roots), but await Mr Humphries contribution before proceeding. ATB, Paul
  2. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Again, very useful here. I'm not aware of anyone having been inspected by the EA resultant from registering an exemption, I guess it just "puts them on the radar", so to speak, should they need to at anytime...or if a query is received from "Joe Public" or, for instance, the LA. Thanks again, Paul
  3. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Hmmm, not surprised they didn't accept the 'VT' exemption TBH. The definition in the EAs previously issued position statement seems pretty clear here. Further, and to reinforce this, their documented guidance on "WHO" should register as a waste carrier makes specific reference to tree surgeons. Thanks for your input here, very useful as I'm currently in discussion with the EA who are reviewing their guidance to 'their' inspectors. Paul
  4. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Very interesting, and very useful, information. Thank you. Is this based on 'experience' or research, or possibly a combination, if you don't mind me asking? Cheers Paul
  5. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Hi David, Firstly, there appears to be a parallel thread for this post to which Stuart Phillips from Lantra has contributed...hence it might be also worth posting there. My understanding is that the earlier Lantra certs had the 5 year expiry, which is really aimed at chainsaw etc. training, included but latter ones didn't / don't. Regarding the refresher training, I haven't undertaken this myself, but its one day as opposed to three and I think it includes some updating but how useful it would be to a person who is very actively CPD'ing I don't know, perhaps someone else could advise. Sorry not to be of more help Paul
  6. AA Teccie (Paul)
    If you search on 'PTI' you'll find lots of previous threads and posts about it. Increasingly this course / certification is becoming recognized as a benchmark for detailed tree inspections in the UK I would suggest. Regards, Paul PS I used to deliver the course and thought it very useful and well-structured and aimed at the actual tree inspection exercise n hence assumed a suitable level of existing arb technical knowledge.
  7. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Hi, the burning exemption is as you've cited, ie specific to the site it is produced and with an individual licence...unfortunately. The timber isn't waste, so nothing needed n the chip an S2 exemption...TBC (I have a current enquiry with the EA which is taking some time to resolve.) Cheers Paul C
  8. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Gary, you can go to the top of the class I just want people / readers to understand CPD doesn't have to involve going to, for instance, conference / seminars, albeit they are very good CPD opportunities and much easier to evidence on your CPD / CEU records, but learning new stuff, and being reminded of "not so" new stuff, is so important / beneficial. Cheers, Paul
  9. AA Teccie (Paul)
    CPD, CPD, CPD (continuing professional development...x3) - ARBTALK at its technical best. Thank you all for contributions Paul
  10. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Afraid not, the LA support for that reduced to the point it was no longer viable. Sorry! We do however offer a 25% discount on the initial assessment fee (min. saving circa £125.00+VAT) to ALL businesses attending the event who then subsequently apply for assessment within 3 months of the workshop date, i.e. 19th Jan. 2017 in this case (the actual assessment visit usually takes place 4-6 weeks later so you get 4-4.5 months to prepare.) Cheers, n thanks for yer question Paul
  11. AA Teccie (Paul)
    APOLOGIES for the (very) short notice here but if this (FREE) event is of interest please see Arboricultural Association - Course Detail Have a good weekend and hope to maybe see you next Weds. at Sparsholt College. Cheers, Paul
  12. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Q. frainetto maybe?
  13. AA Teccie (Paul)
    OR, you could post the notice on the tree...with one of your business cards underneath
  14. AA Teccie (Paul)
    "Great minds" ...hey Timon, hope you're keeping well. Paul
  15. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Mitigation, I would expect, i.e. still "guilty" of committing the offence. However, in practice, I understand one legal test that has to be satisfied is that of "is it in the public interest to prosecute?" This may save yer neck but probably still end up with a caution which is best avoided. Cheers, Paul PS In this particular case, whilst highly unlikely there's been any change, it may be worth just giving the TO a call (know that's oft easier said than done...the "making contact" part) to be sure. hopefully this will further increase your "good standing" with the Council too.
  16. AA Teccie (Paul)
    https://www.nptc.org.uk/assessorhowtobecome.aspx I think, but stand to be corrected, that C&Gs / NPTC currently only offer qualifications by assessment and do not do training, not formally anyway. Lantra Awards do much of the training aspect...and now offer assessments / qualifications too see https://www.nptc.org.uk/assessorhowtobecome.aspx Good luck.. Paul
  17. AA Teccie (Paul)
    There's "some", general, guidance in BS3998 (p.42) and the section refers to "DETR book "Principles of Tree Hazard Assessment and Guidance" too. Don't have any particular experience myself but whenever I've seen it done it appears to follow fairly basic / logical principles ensuring whatever is used is strong enough, and secured enough, and, so far as possible, avoids damaging the branch its supporting. Sorry, not much help but a reply at least Cheers, Paul
  18. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Hmmm, don't look to me for any advice or guidance then Cheers Mark..
  19. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Broadly speaking, and as I understand it, if you are undertaking works to facilitate development, including site clearance or facilitation pruning for house construction etc. then it does come under CIS. If however you are undertaking works to accord with good silvicultural / arboricultural practice etc it doesn't. This is my interpretation of their guidance and shouldn't be taken as definitive (sound like VOSA or EA there ) Cheers.. Paul
  20. AA Teccie (Paul)
    ARBTALK as it's best :lol: I so want to contribute but restraint is the order of the day I believe. Regarding the image (trees/hedge/fence?) = acceptable for what it is I would suggest, i.e. a combination of all three. Cheers all, n thanks for the banter (as observed) Paul
  21. AA Teccie (Paul)
    That one deserves a round of applause, as in fact do most of your other quips. However, what's the phrase about "being sharp"...very apt here. Hahaha. Class 1 or Class 2's, you'll potentially still get cut if you make a contact so, as others have said that PPE is last line of defense so don't go there. Employ good practice n ensure good footing at all times. Tc out there.. Paul
  22. AA Teccie (Paul)
  23. AA Teccie (Paul)
    Very valid point, and one which a few Approved Contractors have recently come unstuck on as we will accept "other forms" of refresher training, e.g. in-house / CPD orientated, provided it is clear and documented...and effective of course. I think, to date, BALI will only accept it if Lantra, City & Guilds / NPTC or FISA, i.e. formalized / certificated refresher training. Cheers, Paul
  24. AA Teccie (Paul)
    "Up-skilling", provided it is relevant to the particular skill area that has exceeded the 5 year refresher period, e.g. CS31 (as was) to CS32/33 to CS34/35 etc. is recognized and accepted by HSE (trouble is where to go after CS35?) Similarly aerially advancing CS39 (as was) to CS40/41, and more CS41, is equally recognized. I would suggest a specific "aerial rescue" refresher / update is the best way forward for CS38, the 'AR' elements at least, plus refreshers for your associated first aid skills which are highly recommended to be industry specific. Cheers.. Paul
  25. AA Teccie (Paul)
    However, to clarify, the PUWER - ACOP (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations - Approved Code of Practice), compliance with which is deemed to satisfy the associated legislation, does indeed refer to"chainsaw qualifications" and further the latest version (Nov. 2014) actually lists them. This reinforces the need to attain the relevant qualifications I would suggest. Cheers, Paul

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.