sime42

Oh jeez. I don't know they were in on the act as well. Like flies round the proverbial.

Lots of jam there. Even more when I mix them with Quinces. Impressive size to some of them this year. Also. See the ladybird hiding in the smaller one. There were many like that.

I'm not comfortable with this idea of human to human contact being replaced with human to AI contact. It seems to be increasingly accepted as the new normal. I heard a health program the other day talking about the use of virtual therapists to help people with mental health problems. Presumably there's at least some regulation backing that up if it's some kind of healthcare provider run thing. However, I recoil at the idea of children talking to AI bots about suicide in some dark, dodgy corners of the web.

A big part of the problem with AI seems to be about who owns it. It's currently largely in the hands of rich, powerful individuals or under corporate control. As such it's being used to further commercial interests and personal agendas. With very few benefits to society as a whole, other than the data crunching. Maybe we need more Open Source AI, as opposed to Closed Source. I won't pretend to know much more about how it works, other than what the names would suggest.

The hardest part of creating conscious AI might be convincing ourselves it’s real THECONVERSATION.COM A philosopher on how and whether we’ll ever decide if AI has sentience.

I know. I think Garage, Tommy Robinson, Andrew Tate, and our very own little wannabe influencer Davey were all complicit in stiring up social division after the event. I expect Musk had his fingers in things in the backend as well. Paragons of virtue all of them obviously. The question is how many of them knew that it was disinformation but broadcast it anyway to further their own agendas? Most I bet.

Some have already been tarred by the tar brush. There's an obvious visual clue.

You Muppet. I've never seen anyone so adept at digging themselves into a hole. And then keep digging. And digging. And digging. The sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human that was responsible for the Southport killings wasn't actually an immigrant, or a Muslim. Also, as heinous as it was, the crime wasn't categorised as a terror attack at sentencing. The guy is just a sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human who has an obsession with extreme violence. Why did you think he was an immigrant, and a Muslim? You got caught out by that BS disinformation at the time, or you just blindly parroted it to stoke division and hatred. I'm not sure which is worse. There might be some interesting statistics in this report if you could read it. Who do Britons hold responsible for the Southport attack? | YouGov YOUGOV.CO.UK The public tend not to see the stabbings as an act of terrorism

I'd rather you in charge than Musk or Thiel, or indeed their AIs. Side stepping the UBI concept. I think humans, or any animal for that matter, is instinctively programmed to have to work in order to exist. We need that as a basic motivation to function in life. Take away the need to work and pretty soon things will start to break down I reckon.

Bullshit. We all know what you were insinuating. You were wrong about the Southport incident, and probably wrong again this time. The speed with which you post these things up after the event every time is indecent. Just trying to make political capital from tragedy. It's not hard to see what kinds of people you want the perpetrators to be, and their motivations. What's not clear is whether or not you actually believe the disinformation that you post on here sometimes, or you're just propagating it to incite division and hatred.

But to what end? What are all the ex-staff, and most of the rest of us humans, when extrapolated, going to be doing? After initially telling tech what to do.

Wordle 1,598 6/6 🟩⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Oi oi savaloy!

Fair enough. I knew it was a thing with Redwoods, and some other tree species I think, it was just that particular picture that I was questioning, not you personally. With the insidious invasion of AI, there's doubt over almost everything these days.

Nice.

I'm not convinced that's real, doesn't look quite right to me. Is it your photo, probably crappy AI again otherwise.

Should be a nice little cycle ride. Google Maps MAPS.APP.GOO.GL It'll be nice if they do get it. A big boost for local biodiversity; a small reversal of the general collapse at least.

True. I'm sure I saw something somewhere recently about a new initiative to try to standardise carparks so that they could all utilise one app, or at least a small number of apps. That'd be great, but I don't see it happening anytime soon sadly.

Not fungi, but well worth a mention nonetheless. Zoom in, zoom in. ,

Some of Dartmoor's finest here.

Wordle 1,597 3/6 🟨⬛🟨🟩⬛ ⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 1,594 6/6 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨⬛🟨 🟨🟩⬛⬛🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩