Bundle 2

Seriously...I have searched Cauls...and come up with pages of tree related data but almost all of it physiology based..... and yeah...ladders are not the way forward here....

****** amateur eh mate....

Liquid cool....but then I always wanted to be a red circle...!!!!

Dont want to be a kill joy...but even the chemicals associated with stickers and decals will be considered by manufacturers as a source of contention if the helmet fails in the field.,..just something you need to be aware of......

Liquid cool bro..you almost make the thing look big,,sorry...BIG !!!

I would like to reiterate my point. the tickets you describe will make you ultimately employable....dont let em tell otherwise bro'

If it blows a good goat,,,,,,,

Sorry to be jus another numpti mate....prhapsd you nedd to work on yopur patience quota...?

C'mon guys..you only got to checknout the tree buzz website to find downloadable pdf files on climbers " slick tricks " aka Climbers corner..theres usableinfo on rigging techniques ans principle to boot.....

Bite the bullet and pay....but make sure you pass if poss....Its the cocktail to success IMO....Clearly you can and must gain experience from those quals' onward but it is up to you to build on your resume. I have paid for most all my own qualifications...you will get nowhere waiting for your employer to get it together in general... good luck!

I have lowered with 12mm using the GRCS...shouldnt be a problem once you getto grips with techniques and process....do not shock load.....do not wind up beyond sensible limits....learn your green log weight values... otherwise use bullrope @ 16mm....sorry to hear you couldnt afford the extra to upgrade to GRCS..infinitely superior tool IMO...>>>

Si...mucho greaso the ol palmo for an interpretation that is as wild as mild oftentimes...all good fun but wouldnt want to spend on this one personally.....

Give me strength...!!!

Yes mate, however I dont think the LPA is beyond reproach here. It should have been picked up at the aia and protected. The LPA has shown a complete lack of understanding of the issues IMO Brings me back to point..get off your high horses and learn from the cock ups that have led to this situation...unless of course you like the damn thing?

Mattheck is no biologist tho eh?

It is not an issue of the predisposition of the stance adopted by the owner but of our understanding of tree care and the things we can & cannot do to achieve and maintain an harmony that values life. Trees. People. Life. Get it !!!

Well maybe you will only need to gonas high as the Treasury dept...but as you most likely already know...Gordon Brown was ***** that up good and proper B4 he was presiden...t...I'm sorry...prime minister:cussing:

Having spent some time in the Australasian continent and in Melbourne actually, I was not only shocked by the level of care they manage to sustain (IMO ****** awful ) but by the way the tree gets used. The point I want to make here is that there are a large number of significantly huge trees retained by owners slap bang butt up to the buildings. Most dwellings are built on a foundation of piles and so root issues are less prevalent. It is done to provide much needed shade to the occupiers.

I got to agree really mate..hence my comment about gettin' off the ol high horse and tryong to accept and learn rarher that continually posturing about how much better a job we could have all made of it....?

IMO you would most likely need to do this a hundred times over if you are to gather information that could in any way be considered reliable for the purposes of informing the industry as to the real characteristics of the fungus Not that this should stop you.

So. I take it we agree that the boundary of your rights is where they conflict with mine. quote. To say" so what" to the owner who must live under this tree when he is worried about it is churlish in the extreme.... If you can guarantee the tree will not fail and smash the house then all good and well: it would be another example of foolhardy and spurious assurance , and in my view with an all to obvious agenda. If as you suggest, our rights are bound by conflict to designate the line thereof, he can freely fear for his safety whilst the tree towers above his bed....those must surely be his rights by the same token! I cant help thinking that the situation should have been avoided in an ideal world. Even by way of the law system we use today. The planning should have accommodated the trees existence and determined a management plan to avoid difficulties such as the one we see.... Like you tho' Tony...i would not want to see another one!

Di you get it yet Deerman?

Better ask Gordon Brown.....