Making the news today....

[Mark J]

33 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

🧐 On January 7, 2026, a mother of three was shot and killed in Minneapolis during a federal immigration operation. The facts are disputed, the video is being parsed frame by frame, and the politics are already hardening.

But there’s a deeper inversion here that has nothing to do with your preferred narrative.

We are teaching people that obstructing law enforcement is a form of virtue. Not voting. Not persuading. Not suing. Not organizing. Obstructing. Physically inserting yourself into a high-voltage encounter and calling it righteousness.

That moral inversion has a cost, and it rarely gets paid by the activist alone.

She left behind three children. They did not volunteer for her cause. They don’t get to vote on her risk tolerance. They don’t get to opt out of the consequences. They just inherit them.

Here’s the hard truth the commentary keeps dodging: when you’re a parent, your “values” are not a private hobby. They are choices that shape someone else’s entire life downstream. Your family is not a side character in your public morality play. They’re the first obligation. Or they’re supposed to be.

“The Cause” cannot raise your children. 

If you want to fight immigration policy, there are lawful lanes: elections, legislation, court challenges, journalism, organizing, peaceful protest that doesn’t cross into direct confrontation. You can be fierce without gambling your children’s future on an encounter you cannot control.

This is the moral inversion: we’re applauding behavior that a sane civilization would recognize as a reckless prioritization of political emotion over parental duty.

I’m not saying her children were unloved. I’m saying they were left unprotected by the very culture that tells adults, especially parents, that “the cause” is a higher calling than the people who depend on them.

Tragedy should produce compassion. It should also produce clarity. When we sanctify obstruction as heroism, we encourage the next person to step closer to the edge. And when they fall, it won’t just be their life that hits the ground.

It will be the lives tethered to theirs
 

 

They wouldn’t have been be there.
 She was well aware of who she was dealing with and what her role was that day. 

Straight out of billionaire funded, pro maga, far right cosplay. Your algorithms must be steeped in that kind of stuff. 

Have a word with yourself. One moment you're saying that if he did mess up then he'll be in the shit. The next you're suggesting that it was all her fault. 


 

Edited 10 hours ago by Mark J

[Johnsond]

11 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Straight out of billionaire funded, pro maga, far right cosplay. Your algorithms must be steeped in that kind of stuff. 

Have a word with yourself. One moment you're saying that if he did mess up then he'll be in the shit. The next your suggesting that it was all her fault. 



 

Is that how you read that 😞objectivity Mark 🤷‍♂️ like I say mention Trump and it’s out the window. 
 

 

[Mark J]

11 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Is that how you read that 😞objectivity Mark 🤷‍♂️ like I say mention Trump and it’s out the window. 
 

 

Can you write that in English? Embellish on the emojis if you will. Ta.

[Johnsond]

20 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Can you write that in English? Embellish on the emojis if you will. Ta.

I rest my case Mark. Leftard arrogance from yourself as usual brought on by a huge dose of TDS. 
Reality is I’m not overly fussed about her death, whilst it’s a shame some kids have lost their biological mother, life goes on. That’s not being callous it’s just the reality of things. 

[tree-fancier123]

some of those ICE look like they would have enjoyed being in the Klu Klux Klan. Total white power nut jobs. Of course there are the odd few black ICE agents, but most are white and proud.

Racists deporting illegals, coz its a taxpayer funded pension too.

[Steven P]

That made me laugh. "If she had followed orders"... because we all know well that everyone so directed will always follow orders. Stick out some traffic management cones to see how well they behave....

 

ANYONE who has to deal with law enforcement has to know that the public DO NOT follow orders, they are not trained monkeys to do as demanded. So to say "If she had followed orders" is simply demonstrating a distinct lack of knowledge of people.

 

As far as I can make out there was no warning the he would shoot, there was less than a second between him drawing his gun and shooting - his mind was made up he was going to shoot (if you care to google driving reaction times, she wasn't given time to react to the drawn gun before she was shot). He stopped feet from the front of the car, there was no risk to others, put himself at risk - and in all training the common theme is do not put yourself at unnecessary risks. If he had walked 2 foot further he would not have been in danger. Whether that is law enforcement or tree climbing the rule is the same.

 

She was a housewife, the car was identified with its registration plate, pick her up later. Or kill her? Noting she was not an immediate threat to anyone (till the officer stood in front of the car).

 

So he screwed up, acted beyond what is reasonable and killed a woman. A woman who was not at all aggressive in any of the videos leading up to her death.

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

I suppose it keep Epstein out the news for a day or two.

Who 

[Johnsond]

16 minutes ago, Steven P said:

That made me laugh. "If she had followed orders"... because we all know well that everyone so directed will always follow orders. Stick out some traffic management cones to see how well they behave....

I’m pleased you find the  situation amusing SP/TA 

If an armed officer was standing on the line of cones would you still drive through them. 
Anyway all the leftard TDS outrage won’t bring her back. 
So what’s your views on the multiple protestor deaths at the hands of the Islamists, men women and children desperate to get out from under that oppressive regime ??. 

[tree-fancier123]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

Min 45 men women and children killed by the Islamist regime 🤔

could this be yet another example of whataboutery?

[Johnsond]

17 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

could this be yet another example of whataboutery?

You’d have to ask the expert, as stated it’s interesting to see the different level of outrage. 

Edited 9 hours ago by Johnsond