Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, sime42 said:

 

Why?

Do you need to know his employment status as well?

For starters why do you care, I explained the employment status question ages ago. SP just danced around anyway so neither here nor there. 
A persons place of birth would possibly explain why they post a link to supposed UK war crimes during a discussion about illegal immigration. Did you genuinely not work that out ?. 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I was born in the UK, and I generally think that war crimes are a bad thing.

 

I guess I'm in the transsexual hippy cuck club again, aren't I... 

Posted
1 hour ago, peds said:

I was born in the UK, and I generally think that war crimes are a bad thing.

 

I guess I'm in the transsexual hippy cuck club again, aren't I... 

Not a clue but I’d like to think not seeing as you say you are involved with kids. Anyway it wasn’t you I asked but I’d absolutely agree that war crimes are a very bad thing. Old Blair for example that bastion of new Labour should be locked up for the crap he caused, pretty sure his actions in the Middle East contributed somewhat to our current channel hopping issues, but I digress. 

Posted
17 hours ago, Johnsond said:

For starters why do you care, I explained the employment status question ages ago. SP just danced around anyway so neither here nor there. 
A persons place of birth would possibly explain why they post a link to supposed UK war crimes during a discussion about illegal immigration. Did you genuinely not work that out ?. 

 

"Supposed UK war crimes"? Which of those listed in the article do you believe to not actually be so? Or were you just talking hypothetically again?

 

No, I generally did not work that out. To my mind a war crime is a war crime, regardless of where it was committed, the perpetrators place of birth or indeed the observers place of birth. I'm pretty sure stuff like this is normally measured objectively, rather than subjectively.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 

"Supposed UK war crimes"? Which of those listed in the article do you believe to not actually be so? Or were you just talking hypothetically again?

 

No, I generally did not work that out. To my mind a war crime is a war crime, regardless of where it was committed, the perpetrators place of birth or indeed the observers place of birth. I'm pretty sure stuff like this is normally measured objectively, rather than subjectively.

 

 

 

 

Just curious 42 have you ever served in any of the armed forces, been on active service or under fire ??. 
People like you observing, judging and commentating from the safety of your own house make my blood boil, we have undoubtedly some of the best ( admittedly successive poor governments have weakened it to a criminally poor state) armed forces in the world. The discipline and the rules of engagement we operated under whilst doing politicians bidding was rigid and unforgiving. Compared to so many other armies or terrorist organisations the UKarned forces over the years have behaved 99.9% of the time as they were instructed. People like you if the shit hits the fan would be the first to demand protection whilst hiding behind your curtain. When was the last time you saw British soldiers beheading, burning alive or shooting innocent civilians 42 ?. In every one of those countries quoted the actions of the people the UK were up against were far worse than anything the British ever did, as for South Africa 🤷‍♂️really let’s face it neither the uk or the Boers had any legitimate claims, 

My question regarding the OP and his place of birth is of course relevant, someone born in Southern Ireland will have a totally different view to someone born in Northumberland. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, sime42 said:

 

"Supposed UK war crimes"? Which of those listed in the article do you believe to not actually be so? Or were you just talking hypothetically again?

 

No, I generally did not work that out. To my mind a war crime is a war crime, regardless of where it was committed, the perpetrators place of birth or indeed the observers place of birth. I'm pretty sure stuff like this is normally measured objectively, rather than subjectively.

 

 

 

 

Just read that whole  one sided article. Still wondering what its relevance to illegal immigration is 🤷‍♂️any ideas 42. 
Regarding human behaviour in war, I’ve got news for you darling, it’s a ****************ing dirty shit business that does by  its very nature take us back to that kill or be killed side of our nature. 

Posted

Yeah... that wiki link is listing the 00.1%, by your numbers. I actually think, percentagewise, you could probably add another few zeroes after the decimal point. Maybe you should have more faith in the bahaviour of our armed forces.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Just curious 42 have you ever served in any of the armed forces, been on active service or under fire ??. 
People like you observing, judging and commentating from the safety of your own house make my blood boil, we have undoubtedly some of the best ( admittedly successive poor governments have weakened it to a criminally poor state) armed forces in the world. The discipline and the rules of engagement we operated under whilst doing politicians bidding was rigid and unforgiving. Compared to so many other armies or terrorist organisations the UKarned forces over the years have behaved 99.9% of the time as they were instructed. People like you if the shit hits the fan would be the first to demand protection whilst hiding behind your curtain. When was the last time you saw British soldiers beheading, burning alive or shooting innocent civilians 42 ?. In every one of those countries quoted the actions of the people the UK were up against were far worse than anything the British ever did, as for South Africa 🤷‍♂️really let’s face it neither the uk or the Boers had any legitimate claims, 

My question regarding the OP and his place of birth is of course relevant, someone born in Southern Ireland will have a totally different view to someone born in Northumberland. 

 

 

And yet, a war crime is still a war crime, regardless of what the other side has done. I'll try another angle, and phrase it differently; war crimes are measured in absolute terms, not relative terms. Does that resonate at all, anywhere?

 

 

Here is a very very small piece of paper, and a very very small pencil;

please list for us the things that do not make your piss boil.

 

I've only ever seen you vent your feelings of indignation, rage and hatred. Never anything positive or uplifting. Why is that?

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted

It matters I think, because it has an adverse affect on the whole Arbtalk site. It's a taint that brings the tone of the place down.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.