Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, newbie here

I'm working with a fella who got his ticket six months ago, and I'm concerned he might have got the wrong end of the stick with this. I don't have a ticket yet, but I have worked around many people who do, and I have never heard or seen anyone put the back cut below the gob. Is this something new? Or maybe for a particular situation, so slopes/leaners/splitty types? The fella reckons that's how he was taught by his instructor and is continuing to do it this way as standard. I'm just worried he continually sets himself up with a tree that sits on the saw and wants to go in the opposite direction to the gob. What do you think?

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Gob? Undercut I think. Anyways, the backcut is always above the undercut, you do not want the tree coming back at you. I prefer a Humboldt undercut, never seen one here. Humbolt is better if the log is going to the mill.

Posted

I've sometimes wondered if there's any benefit in angling the back cut slightly downward (whilst keeping the whole back cut above the hinge). I've tried it on a few slightly (very slightly) back leaning trees with no problems.

 

Have I invented a new cut?....

 

cheers, Steve

Posted (edited)

There are times where I have winched trees with dead tops. Back leakers and limited sound wood higher up to anchor the pull line to.

 

Setting the pull line low in sound wood and then having the back cut under the bottom of the face cut creates a lip so you don't pull the butt off the stump when winching.

 

The faster the winch the better. I wouldn't recommend it on a hand pull or a tirfor.

 

It definitely works in that scenario, it was an old school cutter who showed me that one.

 

In nearly every other application it would be level or above the bottom of the face cut.

Edited by Rich Rule
Posted

Only need the back cut higher to create the hinge on a 45 degree gob cause this coincides with maximum bending moment of the falling stem I believe . 70 degree gob when topping don't need the higher hinge as I understand . Nothing new in slightly downward back cut either , watched a guy chog down an extremely tall pine on YouTube using this method and certainly looked a talented arborist to me .

PS I've never put my backcut below ..

Posted

There are times (flared buttresses) when back cut lower is safer. Back cut above with flared roots and even with an ideal hinge you can risk severing the fibers

Posted

You see here, the top cut, although good thicknes in hinge has no complete fibers. The bottem cut has the most complete fibers

 

image.jpg.f6574924ce6684f867682d94160c700d.jpg

 

 

Something to think about :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.