Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Fracture Pruning Retrenchment on Fulham Oak


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A lovely piece of work monkeyd!. I do quite a bit of work for my local Wildlife Trust and do lots of NFP/Coronet cuts (and have done for the last 8 years or so).

If its in a woodland it should look as natural as possible and if it enhances habitat for wildlife, then its the way to go.

BigA has made a good point, no doubt NPTC will be introducing a new unit to cover this work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

not trying to sound deconstructive but if you want to encourage a flush of growth.... lower and harder on the entrenchment pruning is the option?

what you have done there looks more like a 15% reduction but with tears,from what ive seen with crown regeneration if this is what your trying to encourage surely this wont cause the dormant bud explosion a heavy reduction would encourage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not trying to sound deconstructive but if you want to encourage a flush of growth.... lower and harder on the entrenchment pruning is the option?

what you have done there looks more like a 15% reduction but with tears,from what ive seen with crown regeneration if this is what your trying to encourage surely this wont cause the dormant bud explosion a heavy reduction would encourage?

 

Deconstruction is but the flip side of the same coin that is the state of learning Matty; so the message, to one and all as eluded to before, is feel free to chip in. This Ego is all for a touch of levelling now and again. :wave:

 

I think you hold a fair point with regards to the Re trenchment and dormant bud explosion......but we are also attempting to create a retrenched crown, which would naturally appear stag headed as in the 3rd pic which mature trees will eventually resemble.

This obviously gives us the desired reduced sail plus the ecological benefit of decaying/dead retained branches.

Any foliage at the extremities is IMO a net gain in terms of additional energy production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.