Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  daltontrees said:
Natural England guidance in these situations is "Work should be conducted in a sensitive manner, and where reasonably practicable, timber with bat potential should not be directly sawn through. If such timber is removed, it should be left at the base of the tree for at least 48 hours. Where it is impractical to lower potential bat roosts, piles of brash or logs can be used to soften the impact of them hitting the ground."

 

You are in the realm of breaking the bat protection laws here, with hefty fines, so I'd suggest that you get the ecologist to specify what measures are to be taken. I can't see how a poorly defined term like 'soft felling' is enough to instruct you.

 

Very good advice we have felled one tree already using the method you suggest I'm just after improving the technique and seeing how people lower heavy stems to the ground possibly using other trees for the lowering .

Posted
  skyhuck said:
Normally means lowering the hollow section or sections, IME.

 

The trees in question are like the size of the tree in your avatar and still quite tall so just looking for more options :) thanks

Posted
  Brushcutter said:
I'd of thought you'd be best off lowering the sections out.

 

I think it was in Scotland where the FC felled a load of Douglas Fir on some archeology. They tied the at the top and then they went through some blocks and pullys and i'm guessing some porta wraps to slowly lower the whole tree to the ground very slowly. It was in either Forestry Journal or the FCA mag it was a few years ago now though.

 

I will try and find this info cheers :)

Posted
  Fredward said:

 

Defiantly the kind of thing I'm looking for but the trees we are dealing with are shorter and much heavier timber but great video thankyou :)

Posted
  skyhuck said:
Crane??

 

We once had to crane some stems with bats in and attach them to some other trees on site which were staying so as not to disturb bats to much. Seemed daft but got paid for it so 👍

Posted
  Tree Man Tom said:
We once had to crane some stems with bats in and attach them to some other trees on site which were staying so as not to disturb bats to much. Seemed daft but got paid for it so

 

That's a great idea for the future with smaller pieces but also all trees are being removed . I will defiantly use that idea if I get the chance in the future . I have seen it before at merristwood but I had forgotten about it .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Read more  

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.